通过定性评估了解射血分数降低型心力衰竭 (HFrEF) 患者处方血管紧张素受体-奈普利酶抑制剂 (ARNi) 和钠-葡萄糖转运体抑制剂 (SGLT2i) 的障碍和促进因素。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102224
Apoorva M Pradhan, Mia Lussier, My Nguyen, Stephen Voyce, Eric A Wright
{"title":"通过定性评估了解射血分数降低型心力衰竭 (HFrEF) 患者处方血管紧张素受体-奈普利酶抑制剂 (ARNi) 和钠-葡萄糖转运体抑制剂 (SGLT2i) 的障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Apoorva M Pradhan, Mia Lussier, My Nguyen, Stephen Voyce, Eric A Wright","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) being cost-effective evidenced-based therapies for the management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), research shows that less than 30% of patients with HFrEF are prescribed these agents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand clinician-perceived barriers and facilitators to prescribing ARNi and SGLT2i in patients with HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted virtual and in-person semi-structured interviews in a large integrated healthcare delivery system in the United States. Twenty cardiology clinicians managing patients with HFrEF were recruited using purposeful sampling to target providers across professions and practice sites. The interview guide was developed based on a literature review and insights from a practicing cardiologist. It inquired about perceived prescribing behaviors, focusing on factors affecting the use of ARNi and SGLT2i. We identified key themes using rapid qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty clinicians were interviewed: 13 physicians, five advanced practitioners, and two clinic-based pharmacists. Eighteen interviews were analyzed; we excluded two as the clinicians interviewed did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three major themes were identified: 1) clinician-reported prescribing patterns don't always align with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the use of SGLT2i and ARNi due to clinical inertia, lack of familiarity, knowledge, and comfort with use, and concerns over polypharmacy or adverse events, 2) clinician-perceived and actual out-of-pocket cost reduced prescribing of ARNi or SGLT2i to patients, exacerbated by a lack of visibility into patients' prescription coverage, denials of coverage by insurance, and navigating prior authorization related workflows, and 3) incorporation of a clinic-based pharmacist increased the prescribing of these medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing cost transparency, implementing interventions to overcome clinical inertia and cost hurdles, and increasing clinic-based pharmacist support may improve evidenced-based prescribing in patients with HFrEF, especially for comparatively novel classes such as ARNi and SGLT2i.</p>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative Evaluation to Understand Barriers and Facilitators to Prescribing Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors (ARNi) and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Inhibitors (SGLT2i) in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF).\",\"authors\":\"Apoorva M Pradhan, Mia Lussier, My Nguyen, Stephen Voyce, Eric A Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) being cost-effective evidenced-based therapies for the management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), research shows that less than 30% of patients with HFrEF are prescribed these agents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand clinician-perceived barriers and facilitators to prescribing ARNi and SGLT2i in patients with HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted virtual and in-person semi-structured interviews in a large integrated healthcare delivery system in the United States. Twenty cardiology clinicians managing patients with HFrEF were recruited using purposeful sampling to target providers across professions and practice sites. The interview guide was developed based on a literature review and insights from a practicing cardiologist. It inquired about perceived prescribing behaviors, focusing on factors affecting the use of ARNi and SGLT2i. We identified key themes using rapid qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty clinicians were interviewed: 13 physicians, five advanced practitioners, and two clinic-based pharmacists. Eighteen interviews were analyzed; we excluded two as the clinicians interviewed did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three major themes were identified: 1) clinician-reported prescribing patterns don't always align with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the use of SGLT2i and ARNi due to clinical inertia, lack of familiarity, knowledge, and comfort with use, and concerns over polypharmacy or adverse events, 2) clinician-perceived and actual out-of-pocket cost reduced prescribing of ARNi or SGLT2i to patients, exacerbated by a lack of visibility into patients' prescription coverage, denials of coverage by insurance, and navigating prior authorization related workflows, and 3) incorporation of a clinic-based pharmacist increased the prescribing of these medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing cost transparency, implementing interventions to overcome clinical inertia and cost hurdles, and increasing clinic-based pharmacist support may improve evidenced-based prescribing in patients with HFrEF, especially for comparatively novel classes such as ARNi and SGLT2i.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102224\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和血管紧张素受体/肾素抑制剂(ARNi)是治疗射血分数减低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)的经济有效的循证疗法,但研究表明,只有不到30%的HFrEF患者处方了这些药物:本研究旨在了解临床医生在为 HFrEF 患者开具 ARNi 和 SGLT2i 处方时遇到的障碍和促进因素:我们在美国的一个大型综合医疗保健服务系统中进行了虚拟和面对面的半结构化访谈。通过有目的的抽样调查,我们招募了 20 名管理 HFrEF 患者的心脏病学临床医生,他们均为不同专业和执业地点的医疗服务提供者。访谈指南是根据文献综述和一名执业心脏病专家的见解制定的。它询问了患者的处方行为,重点是影响 ARNi 和 SGLT2i 使用的因素。我们通过快速定性分析确定了关键主题:我们对 20 名临床医生进行了访谈:结果:我们对 20 名临床医生进行了访谈:13 名医生、5 名高级执业医师和 2 名诊所药剂师。我们对 18 个访谈进行了分析;由于受访临床医生不符合纳入标准,我们排除了两个访谈。我们确定了三大主题1)临床医生报告的处方模式并不总是符合美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于使用 SGLT2i 和 ARNi 的指南,原因包括临床惰性、缺乏熟悉、知识和使用舒适度,以及对多重用药或不良事件的担忧、2)临床医生认为和实际的自付费用减少了患者对 ARNi 或 SGLT2i 的处方,而缺乏对患者处方承保范围的了解、保险拒绝承保以及与事先授权相关的工作流程又加剧了这种情况;以及 3)诊所药剂师的加入增加了这些药物的处方量。结论提高成本透明度、实施干预措施以克服临床惰性和成本障碍,以及增加诊所药剂师的支持,可改善心衰患者的循证处方,尤其是 ARNi 和 SGLT2i 等相对新型的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qualitative Evaluation to Understand Barriers and Facilitators to Prescribing Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors (ARNi) and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Inhibitors (SGLT2i) in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF).

Background: Despite sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) being cost-effective evidenced-based therapies for the management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), research shows that less than 30% of patients with HFrEF are prescribed these agents.

Objective: This study aimed to understand clinician-perceived barriers and facilitators to prescribing ARNi and SGLT2i in patients with HFrEF.

Methods: We conducted virtual and in-person semi-structured interviews in a large integrated healthcare delivery system in the United States. Twenty cardiology clinicians managing patients with HFrEF were recruited using purposeful sampling to target providers across professions and practice sites. The interview guide was developed based on a literature review and insights from a practicing cardiologist. It inquired about perceived prescribing behaviors, focusing on factors affecting the use of ARNi and SGLT2i. We identified key themes using rapid qualitative analysis.

Results: Twenty clinicians were interviewed: 13 physicians, five advanced practitioners, and two clinic-based pharmacists. Eighteen interviews were analyzed; we excluded two as the clinicians interviewed did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three major themes were identified: 1) clinician-reported prescribing patterns don't always align with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the use of SGLT2i and ARNi due to clinical inertia, lack of familiarity, knowledge, and comfort with use, and concerns over polypharmacy or adverse events, 2) clinician-perceived and actual out-of-pocket cost reduced prescribing of ARNi or SGLT2i to patients, exacerbated by a lack of visibility into patients' prescription coverage, denials of coverage by insurance, and navigating prior authorization related workflows, and 3) incorporation of a clinic-based pharmacist increased the prescribing of these medications.

Conclusions: Increasing cost transparency, implementing interventions to overcome clinical inertia and cost hurdles, and increasing clinic-based pharmacist support may improve evidenced-based prescribing in patients with HFrEF, especially for comparatively novel classes such as ARNi and SGLT2i.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Network Facilitator Experiences Implementing Payer-Partner Programs within a Nationwide Clinically Integrated Network. Feasibility of reaching populations at high risk for HIV in community pharmacies. How New Pharmacists Handled COVID-19 Misinformation: A Qualitative Study. Because I See You: Pharmacist Social Determinants of Health as Predictor of Structural Awareness. Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Employment Status Change for Practicing Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1