手术边缘状态对早期乳腺癌患者总生存期的预后影响:柏林夏里特大学医院妇女医学部的回顾性分析。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2374-2270
Maximilian Heinz Beck, Karoline Barbara Stephanie Weiler, Anna Trelinska-Finger, Jens-Uwe Blohmer
{"title":"手术边缘状态对早期乳腺癌患者总生存期的预后影响:柏林夏里特大学医院妇女医学部的回顾性分析。","authors":"Maximilian Heinz Beck, Karoline Barbara Stephanie Weiler, Anna Trelinska-Finger, Jens-Uwe Blohmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2374-2270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of surgical margins on the prognosis of early breast cancer remains uncertain, particularly in the context of modern treatment approaches. This study aimed to investigate whether involved margins after surgery for early breast cancer affect overall survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3767 patients who underwent surgery for primary breast cancer or carcinoma in situ between 2006 and 2022 at Charité - University Hospital Berlin. Survival analysis based on margin status and a subsequent multivariate Cox regression analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 72.2 months, clear margins were achieved in 81.4% of patients (n = 3068) after primary surgery, while 16.2% (n = 610) required re-excision. Only 2.4% of patients (n = 89) had definitively involved margins. Margin involvement was more common in hormone receptor-positive disease, lobular subtype, carcinoma in situ, or locally advanced tumors, but less frequent in patients with previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or triple-negative breast cancer. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a significant separation with worse outcomes for patients with definitive R1 resections. However, the multivariate Cox regression analysis detected no statistically significant difference in overall survival based on margin status. Breast conserving surgery (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.54-0.81) and HER2 overexpression (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48-0.89) were associated with improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery in our study demonstrated favorable outcomes compared to patients after mastectomy. Although margin status did not significantly affect overall survival, larger multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic implications of margin involvement in breast cancer treatment in different tumor stages, tumor subtypes and local and systemic treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Overall Survival of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from the Department for Women's Medicine at Charité - University Hospital Berlin.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Heinz Beck, Karoline Barbara Stephanie Weiler, Anna Trelinska-Finger, Jens-Uwe Blohmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2374-2270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of surgical margins on the prognosis of early breast cancer remains uncertain, particularly in the context of modern treatment approaches. This study aimed to investigate whether involved margins after surgery for early breast cancer affect overall survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3767 patients who underwent surgery for primary breast cancer or carcinoma in situ between 2006 and 2022 at Charité - University Hospital Berlin. Survival analysis based on margin status and a subsequent multivariate Cox regression analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 72.2 months, clear margins were achieved in 81.4% of patients (n = 3068) after primary surgery, while 16.2% (n = 610) required re-excision. Only 2.4% of patients (n = 89) had definitively involved margins. Margin involvement was more common in hormone receptor-positive disease, lobular subtype, carcinoma in situ, or locally advanced tumors, but less frequent in patients with previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or triple-negative breast cancer. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a significant separation with worse outcomes for patients with definitive R1 resections. However, the multivariate Cox regression analysis detected no statistically significant difference in overall survival based on margin status. Breast conserving surgery (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.54-0.81) and HER2 overexpression (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48-0.89) were associated with improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery in our study demonstrated favorable outcomes compared to patients after mastectomy. Although margin status did not significantly affect overall survival, larger multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic implications of margin involvement in breast cancer treatment in different tumor stages, tumor subtypes and local and systemic treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368467/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2374-2270\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2374-2270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:手术边缘对早期乳腺癌预后的影响仍不确定,尤其是在现代治疗方法的背景下。本研究旨在探讨早期乳腺癌手术后受累边缘是否会影响总生存率:我们对 2006 年至 2022 年期间在柏林夏里特大学医院接受原发性乳腺癌或原位癌手术的 3767 名患者进行了回顾性分析。我们根据边缘状态进行了生存分析,并随后进行了多变量 Cox 回归分析:中位随访时间为72.2个月,81.4%的患者(n = 3068)在初次手术后边缘清晰,16.2%的患者(n = 610)需要再次切除。只有 2.4% 的患者(n = 89)的边缘明确受累。边缘受累在激素受体阳性疾病、小叶亚型、原位癌或局部晚期肿瘤中更为常见,但在曾接受新辅助化疗或三阴性乳腺癌患者中则较少见。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,明确R1切除的患者预后较差。然而,多变量考克斯回归分析发现,边缘状态对总生存率的影响在统计学上没有显著差异。保乳手术(HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.54-0.81)和HER2过表达(HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48-0.89)与生存率的提高有关:结论:在我们的研究中,与接受乳房切除术的患者相比,接受保乳手术的患者的预后较好。尽管边缘状态对总生存率没有明显影响,但仍需进行更大规模的多中心研究,以评估边缘受累对不同肿瘤分期、肿瘤亚型以及局部和全身治疗的乳腺癌治疗的预后影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Overall Survival of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from the Department for Women's Medicine at Charité - University Hospital Berlin.

Introduction: The impact of surgical margins on the prognosis of early breast cancer remains uncertain, particularly in the context of modern treatment approaches. This study aimed to investigate whether involved margins after surgery for early breast cancer affect overall survival.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3767 patients who underwent surgery for primary breast cancer or carcinoma in situ between 2006 and 2022 at Charité - University Hospital Berlin. Survival analysis based on margin status and a subsequent multivariate Cox regression analysis were conducted.

Results: With a median follow-up of 72.2 months, clear margins were achieved in 81.4% of patients (n = 3068) after primary surgery, while 16.2% (n = 610) required re-excision. Only 2.4% of patients (n = 89) had definitively involved margins. Margin involvement was more common in hormone receptor-positive disease, lobular subtype, carcinoma in situ, or locally advanced tumors, but less frequent in patients with previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or triple-negative breast cancer. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a significant separation with worse outcomes for patients with definitive R1 resections. However, the multivariate Cox regression analysis detected no statistically significant difference in overall survival based on margin status. Breast conserving surgery (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.54-0.81) and HER2 overexpression (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48-0.89) were associated with improved survival.

Conclusion: Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery in our study demonstrated favorable outcomes compared to patients after mastectomy. Although margin status did not significantly affect overall survival, larger multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic implications of margin involvement in breast cancer treatment in different tumor stages, tumor subtypes and local and systemic treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
828
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (GebFra) addresses the whole field of obstetrics and gynecology and is concerned with research as much as with clinical practice. In its scientific section, it publishes original articles, reviews and case reports in all fields of the discipline, namely gynecological oncology, including oncology of the breast obstetrics and perinatal medicine, reproductive medicine, and urogynecology. GebFra invites the submission of original articles and review articles. In addition, the journal publishes guidelines, statements and recommendations in cooperation with the DGGG, SGGG, OEGGG and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Association of Scientific Medical Societies, www.awmf.org). Apart from the scientific section, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde has a news and views section that also includes discussions, book reviews and professional information. Letters to the editors are welcome. If a letter discusses an article that has been published in our journal, the corresponding author of the article will be informed and invited to comment on the letter. The comment will be published along with the letter.
期刊最新文献
From Gaps to Solutions: Semi-Structured Interviews to Identify Care Gaps in Breast Cancer Care and How to Solve Them with Digital Solutions. Letter to the Editor: Administration of Antenatal Corticosteroids: Optimal Timing. Novel Antibody-Drug-Conjugates in Routine Clinical Practice for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Adherence, Efficacy and Tolerability - Real-World Data from German Breast Centers. Palbociclib: Randomized Studies and Real-world Evidence as the Basis for Therapeutic Planning in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Prognostic Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Overall Survival of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from the Department for Women's Medicine at Charité - University Hospital Berlin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1