医院的多样性、公平性和包容性工作:病人和家属顾问的观点。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-065789
Carlos A Casillas, Andrew F Beck, Laura Rangel Rodriguez, Ushma Patel, LaToshia Rouse, Valerie L Ward, Darcel Jackson, Pam Dardess, Ndidi Unaka
{"title":"医院的多样性、公平性和包容性工作:病人和家属顾问的观点。","authors":"Carlos A Casillas, Andrew F Beck, Laura Rangel Rodriguez, Ushma Patel, LaToshia Rouse, Valerie L Ward, Darcel Jackson, Pam Dardess, Ndidi Unaka","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-065789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Patient and family advisory councils are common within children's hospitals. However, lack of diversity among patient and family advisors (PFAs) may result in exclusion of crucial perspectives and perpetuate inequities. We sought to understand PFA perspectives on how children's hospitals should approach: (1) recruitment and support of PFAs from groups at greater risk of health inequities; and (2) development of meaningful partnerships with PFAs or patient and family advisory councils on institutional diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study of PFAs of children's hospitals from communities at greater risk for health inequities based on self-identified race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, disability, language, or other factors. Focus groups were virtual and group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 17 PFAs participated across 5 focus groups (4 in English, 1 in Spanish). We identified 6 themes: (1) PFA diversity is necessary to understand existing health inequities; (2) diversity needs to be considered broadly; (3) recruiting for diverse PFAs requires intentionality, visibility of PFACs within and outside of the hospital, and deliberate connections with families and communities; (4) efforts to increase PFAC diversity must be accompanied by work to develop inclusive environments; (5) diversity efforts require meaningful engagement and equity; and (6) diverse PFACs can enrich DEI efforts but require organizational commitment and follow-through.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insights from our qualitative study of PFAs can be used by healthcare systems to foster diversity and inclusion in PFACs and advance hospital DEI efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts: Perspectives of Patient and Family Advisors.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos A Casillas, Andrew F Beck, Laura Rangel Rodriguez, Ushma Patel, LaToshia Rouse, Valerie L Ward, Darcel Jackson, Pam Dardess, Ndidi Unaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-065789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p></p><p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Patient and family advisory councils are common within children's hospitals. However, lack of diversity among patient and family advisors (PFAs) may result in exclusion of crucial perspectives and perpetuate inequities. We sought to understand PFA perspectives on how children's hospitals should approach: (1) recruitment and support of PFAs from groups at greater risk of health inequities; and (2) development of meaningful partnerships with PFAs or patient and family advisory councils on institutional diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study of PFAs of children's hospitals from communities at greater risk for health inequities based on self-identified race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, disability, language, or other factors. Focus groups were virtual and group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 17 PFAs participated across 5 focus groups (4 in English, 1 in Spanish). We identified 6 themes: (1) PFA diversity is necessary to understand existing health inequities; (2) diversity needs to be considered broadly; (3) recruiting for diverse PFAs requires intentionality, visibility of PFACs within and outside of the hospital, and deliberate connections with families and communities; (4) efforts to increase PFAC diversity must be accompanied by work to develop inclusive environments; (5) diversity efforts require meaningful engagement and equity; and (6) diverse PFACs can enrich DEI efforts but require organizational commitment and follow-through.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insights from our qualitative study of PFAs can be used by healthcare systems to foster diversity and inclusion in PFACs and advance hospital DEI efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-065789\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-065789","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:患者及家属顾问委员会在儿童医院中很常见。然而,患者及家属顾问(PFA)缺乏多样性可能会导致重要观点被排除在外,并使不公平现象长期存在。我们试图了解患者及家属顾问对儿童医院应如何处理以下问题的看法:(1)从健康不平等风险较大的群体中招募和支持患者及家属顾问;(2)与患者及家属顾问或患者及家属咨询委员会就机构多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)工作建立有意义的合作关系:我们对儿童医院的 PFAs 进行了一项定性研究,这些 PFAs 来自于健康不公平风险较高的社区,这些社区基于自我认定的种族、民族、性别、社会经济地位、残疾、语言或其他因素。焦点小组采用虚拟形式,小组讨论经过记录、转录,并采用归纳定性分析法进行分析:共有 17 名 PFA 参与了 5 个焦点小组(4 个英语小组,1 个西班牙语小组)。我们确定了 6 个主题:(1) PFA 的多样性对于了解现有的健康不平等现象十分必要;(2) 需要广泛考虑多样性问题;(3) 招聘多样化的 PFA 需要有目的性、PFAC 在医院内外的能见度以及与家庭和社区的有意联系;(4) 在努力提高 PFAC 多样性的同时,必须努力发展包容性环境;(5) 多样性工作需要有意义的参与和公平;(6) 多样化的 PFAC 可以丰富 DEI 工作,但需要组织承诺和贯彻执行:结论:医疗保健系统可利用我们对 PFA 的定性研究得出的见解来促进 PFAC 的多样性和包容性,并推进医院的 DEI 工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospital Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts: Perspectives of Patient and Family Advisors.

Background and objectives: Patient and family advisory councils are common within children's hospitals. However, lack of diversity among patient and family advisors (PFAs) may result in exclusion of crucial perspectives and perpetuate inequities. We sought to understand PFA perspectives on how children's hospitals should approach: (1) recruitment and support of PFAs from groups at greater risk of health inequities; and (2) development of meaningful partnerships with PFAs or patient and family advisory councils on institutional diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of PFAs of children's hospitals from communities at greater risk for health inequities based on self-identified race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, disability, language, or other factors. Focus groups were virtual and group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive qualitative analysis.

Results: In total, 17 PFAs participated across 5 focus groups (4 in English, 1 in Spanish). We identified 6 themes: (1) PFA diversity is necessary to understand existing health inequities; (2) diversity needs to be considered broadly; (3) recruiting for diverse PFAs requires intentionality, visibility of PFACs within and outside of the hospital, and deliberate connections with families and communities; (4) efforts to increase PFAC diversity must be accompanied by work to develop inclusive environments; (5) diversity efforts require meaningful engagement and equity; and (6) diverse PFACs can enrich DEI efforts but require organizational commitment and follow-through.

Conclusions: Insights from our qualitative study of PFAs can be used by healthcare systems to foster diversity and inclusion in PFACs and advance hospital DEI efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
Prophylaxis Options in Children With a History of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review. Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Prevention: Progress and Challenges. Rett Syndrome and the Broader Implications of the Use of Eponyms in Medicine. RSV Neutralizing Antibodies Following Nirsevimab and Palivizumab Dosing. ECMO Survivors' Reflections on Their ICU Experience and Recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1