采用不同探测器配置的两种 HPGe 肺计数器的性能比较研究。

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Radiation protection dosimetry Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncae183
Masayuki Naito, Yuki Tamakuma, Yuma Mihei, Kazuaki Yajima, Kotaro Tani, Eunjoo Kim, Munehiko Kowatari, Osamu Kurihara
{"title":"采用不同探测器配置的两种 HPGe 肺计数器的性能比较研究。","authors":"Masayuki Naito, Yuki Tamakuma, Yuma Mihei, Kazuaki Yajima, Kotaro Tani, Eunjoo Kim, Munehiko Kowatari, Osamu Kurihara","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncae183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares the performance of old and new lung counters in the National Institutes for Quantum Sciences and Technology of Japan. The total sensitive area of the detector crystals for the new lung counter is ~15% smaller than that for the old lung counter. Minimum detectable activities (MDAs) for 241Am and 239Pu were evaluated through experiments using a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory torso phantom. Despite differences in detector configuration, the MDAs were found to be comparable between the two lung counters. For a chest wall thickness of 2.1 cm and a counting time of 30 min, the MDAs of 241Am and 239Pu were 5.7 and 2300 Bq for the old lung counter, and 5.5 and 2600 Bq for the new lung counter, respectively. Experimental results for the relative sensitivities between left-side and right-side detectors suggested that the new lung counter offered better measurement geometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A performance comparison study between two HPGe lung counters with different detector configurations.\",\"authors\":\"Masayuki Naito, Yuki Tamakuma, Yuma Mihei, Kazuaki Yajima, Kotaro Tani, Eunjoo Kim, Munehiko Kowatari, Osamu Kurihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpd/ncae183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compares the performance of old and new lung counters in the National Institutes for Quantum Sciences and Technology of Japan. The total sensitive area of the detector crystals for the new lung counter is ~15% smaller than that for the old lung counter. Minimum detectable activities (MDAs) for 241Am and 239Pu were evaluated through experiments using a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory torso phantom. Despite differences in detector configuration, the MDAs were found to be comparable between the two lung counters. For a chest wall thickness of 2.1 cm and a counting time of 30 min, the MDAs of 241Am and 239Pu were 5.7 and 2300 Bq for the old lung counter, and 5.5 and 2600 Bq for the new lung counter, respectively. Experimental results for the relative sensitivities between left-side and right-side detectors suggested that the new lung counter offered better measurement geometry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncae183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncae183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了日本国立量子科学与技术研究所的新旧肺计数器的性能。新型肺计数器探测器晶体的总灵敏面积比老式肺计数器小 15%。通过使用劳伦斯-利弗莫尔国家实验室的躯干模型进行实验,评估了 241Am 和 239Pu 的最小可探测活度 (MDA)。尽管探测器配置不同,但发现两种肺计数器的 MDA 值相当。在胸壁厚度为 2.1 厘米、计数时间为 30 分钟的情况下,旧肺计数器的 241Am 和 239Pu 的 MDA 分别为 5.7 和 2300 Bq,而新肺计数器的 MDA 分别为 5.5 和 2600 Bq。左侧和右侧探测器相对灵敏度的实验结果表明,新型肺计数器具有更好的测量几何特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A performance comparison study between two HPGe lung counters with different detector configurations.

This study compares the performance of old and new lung counters in the National Institutes for Quantum Sciences and Technology of Japan. The total sensitive area of the detector crystals for the new lung counter is ~15% smaller than that for the old lung counter. Minimum detectable activities (MDAs) for 241Am and 239Pu were evaluated through experiments using a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory torso phantom. Despite differences in detector configuration, the MDAs were found to be comparable between the two lung counters. For a chest wall thickness of 2.1 cm and a counting time of 30 min, the MDAs of 241Am and 239Pu were 5.7 and 2300 Bq for the old lung counter, and 5.5 and 2600 Bq for the new lung counter, respectively. Experimental results for the relative sensitivities between left-side and right-side detectors suggested that the new lung counter offered better measurement geometry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation protection dosimetry
Radiation protection dosimetry 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of occupational radiation exposure during a specific endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure. Evaluating lead-free alternatives for radiation shielding in diagnostic radiology: a case study from a tertiary general hospital in Korea. An electronic energy compensation method for flattening the energy response of SiPM-GGAG:Ce,B based gamma detector. An approach to assess real workload of medical linear accelerators in Sri Lanka. Assessment of foetal dose and occupational exposure for pregnant workers in nuclear medicine using the Taiwanese pregnancy phantom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1