伦敦和卢顿儿童健康(CHILL)队列:关于超低排放区对儿童上学交通影响的为期 12 个月的自然实验研究。

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7
Christina Xiao, James Scales, Jasmine Chavda, Rosamund E Dove, Ivelina Tsocheva, Helen E Wood, Harpal Kalsi, Luke Sartori, Grainne Colligan, Jessica Moon, Esther Lie, Kristian Petrovic, Bill Day, Cheryll Howett, Amanda Keighley, Borislava Mihaylova, Veronica Toffolutti, Jonathan Grigg, Gurch Randhawa, Aziz Sheikh, Monica Fletcher, Ian Mudway, Sean Beevers, W James Gauderman, Christopher J Griffiths, Esther van Sluijs, Jenna Panter
{"title":"伦敦和卢顿儿童健康(CHILL)队列:关于超低排放区对儿童上学交通影响的为期 12 个月的自然实验研究。","authors":"Christina Xiao, James Scales, Jasmine Chavda, Rosamund E Dove, Ivelina Tsocheva, Helen E Wood, Harpal Kalsi, Luke Sartori, Grainne Colligan, Jessica Moon, Esther Lie, Kristian Petrovic, Bill Day, Cheryll Howett, Amanda Keighley, Borislava Mihaylova, Veronica Toffolutti, Jonathan Grigg, Gurch Randhawa, Aziz Sheikh, Monica Fletcher, Ian Mudway, Sean Beevers, W James Gauderman, Christopher J Griffiths, Esther van Sluijs, Jenna Panter","doi":"10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), introduced in Central London in April 2019, aims to enhance air quality and improve public health. The Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) study evaluates the impact of the ULEZ on children's health. This analysis focuses on the one-year impacts on the shift towards active travel to school.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CHILL is a prospective parallel cohort study of ethnically diverse children, aged 6-9 years attending 84 primary schools within or with catchment areas encompassing London's ULEZ (intervention) and Luton (non-intervention area). Baseline (2018/19) and one-year follow-up (2019/20) data were collected at school visits from 1992 (58%) children who reported their mode of travel to school 'today' (day of assessment). Multilevel logistic regressions were performed to analyse associations between the introduction of the ULEZ and the likelihood of switching from inactive to active travel modes, and vice-versa. Interactions between intervention group status and pre-specified effect modifiers were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes. For children taking active modes at baseline, 5% of children in London and 21% of children in Luton switched to inactive modes. Relative to the children in Luton, children in London were more likely to have switched from inactive to active modes (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.21-10.92). Children in the intervention group were also less likely to switch from active to inactive modes (OR 0.11, 0.05-0.24). Moderator analyses showed that children living further from school were more likely to switch from inactive to active modes (OR 6.06,1.87-19.68) compared to those living closer (OR 1.43, 0.27-7.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of clean air zones can increase uptake of active travel to school and was particularly associated with more sustainable and active travel in children living further from school.</p>","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) cohort: a 12-month natural experimental study of the effects of the Ultra Low Emission Zone on children's travel to school.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Xiao, James Scales, Jasmine Chavda, Rosamund E Dove, Ivelina Tsocheva, Helen E Wood, Harpal Kalsi, Luke Sartori, Grainne Colligan, Jessica Moon, Esther Lie, Kristian Petrovic, Bill Day, Cheryll Howett, Amanda Keighley, Borislava Mihaylova, Veronica Toffolutti, Jonathan Grigg, Gurch Randhawa, Aziz Sheikh, Monica Fletcher, Ian Mudway, Sean Beevers, W James Gauderman, Christopher J Griffiths, Esther van Sluijs, Jenna Panter\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), introduced in Central London in April 2019, aims to enhance air quality and improve public health. The Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) study evaluates the impact of the ULEZ on children's health. This analysis focuses on the one-year impacts on the shift towards active travel to school.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CHILL is a prospective parallel cohort study of ethnically diverse children, aged 6-9 years attending 84 primary schools within or with catchment areas encompassing London's ULEZ (intervention) and Luton (non-intervention area). Baseline (2018/19) and one-year follow-up (2019/20) data were collected at school visits from 1992 (58%) children who reported their mode of travel to school 'today' (day of assessment). Multilevel logistic regressions were performed to analyse associations between the introduction of the ULEZ and the likelihood of switching from inactive to active travel modes, and vice-versa. Interactions between intervention group status and pre-specified effect modifiers were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes. For children taking active modes at baseline, 5% of children in London and 21% of children in Luton switched to inactive modes. Relative to the children in Luton, children in London were more likely to have switched from inactive to active modes (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.21-10.92). Children in the intervention group were also less likely to switch from active to inactive modes (OR 0.11, 0.05-0.24). Moderator analyses showed that children living further from school were more likely to switch from inactive to active modes (OR 6.06,1.87-19.68) compared to those living closer (OR 1.43, 0.27-7.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of clean air zones can increase uptake of active travel to school and was particularly associated with more sustainable and active travel in children living further from school.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超低排放区 (ULEZ) 于 2019 年 4 月在伦敦市中心推出,旨在提高空气质量和改善公众健康。伦敦和卢顿儿童健康(CHILL)研究评估了超低排放区对儿童健康的影响。本分析的重点是一年内对积极出行上学的影响:CHILL 是一项前瞻性平行队列研究,研究对象是在伦敦 ULEZ(干预区)和卢顿(非干预区)内或其集水区包括在内的 84 所小学就读的 6-9 岁不同种族儿童。基线(2018/19 学年)和一年随访(2019/20 学年)数据是在学校访问时从 1992 名(58%)报告其上学交通方式为 "今天"(评估当天)的儿童中收集的。我们进行了多层次逻辑回归,以分析ULEZ的引入与从非主动出行方式转变为主动出行方式的可能性之间的关联,反之亦然。此外,还探讨了干预组状况与预先指定的效应调节因子之间的交互作用:结果:在基线采用非主动出行方式的儿童中,伦敦有 42% 的儿童和卢顿有 20% 的儿童转而采用主动出行方式。对于基线时采用主动模式的儿童,5%的伦敦儿童和21%的卢顿儿童转而采用非主动模式。与卢顿的儿童相比,伦敦的儿童更有可能从非活动模式转为活动模式(OR 3.64,95% CI 1.21-10.92)。干预组中的儿童也较少从主动模式转为非主动模式(OR 0.11,0.05-0.24)。主持人分析表明,与居住地较近的儿童(OR 1.43,0.27-7.54)相比,居住地离学校较远的儿童更有可能从非活动模式转为活动模式(OR 6.06,1.87-19.68):结论:清洁空气区的实施可以提高上学时积极出行的比例,尤其是对那些住在离学校较远的儿童而言,这与他们更多采用可持续和积极的出行方式有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) cohort: a 12-month natural experimental study of the effects of the Ultra Low Emission Zone on children's travel to school.

Background: The Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), introduced in Central London in April 2019, aims to enhance air quality and improve public health. The Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) study evaluates the impact of the ULEZ on children's health. This analysis focuses on the one-year impacts on the shift towards active travel to school.

Methods: CHILL is a prospective parallel cohort study of ethnically diverse children, aged 6-9 years attending 84 primary schools within or with catchment areas encompassing London's ULEZ (intervention) and Luton (non-intervention area). Baseline (2018/19) and one-year follow-up (2019/20) data were collected at school visits from 1992 (58%) children who reported their mode of travel to school 'today' (day of assessment). Multilevel logistic regressions were performed to analyse associations between the introduction of the ULEZ and the likelihood of switching from inactive to active travel modes, and vice-versa. Interactions between intervention group status and pre-specified effect modifiers were also explored.

Results: Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes. For children taking active modes at baseline, 5% of children in London and 21% of children in Luton switched to inactive modes. Relative to the children in Luton, children in London were more likely to have switched from inactive to active modes (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.21-10.92). Children in the intervention group were also less likely to switch from active to inactive modes (OR 0.11, 0.05-0.24). Moderator analyses showed that children living further from school were more likely to switch from inactive to active modes (OR 6.06,1.87-19.68) compared to those living closer (OR 1.43, 0.27-7.54).

Conclusions: Implementation of clean air zones can increase uptake of active travel to school and was particularly associated with more sustainable and active travel in children living further from school.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.
期刊最新文献
The case for investment in nutritional interventions to prevent and reduce childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity in Peru: a modelling study. Evaluating the impact of the universal infant free school meal policy on the ultra-processed food content of children's lunches in England and Scotland: a natural experiment. Secular trends and sociodemographic disparities in physical activity among adults in eleven African countries: WHO STEPS 2003-2020. Thinking about inequalities in physical activity as an emergent feature of complex systems. National school food standards in England: a cross-sectional study to explore compliance in secondary schools and impact on pupil nutritional intake.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1