瑞士特吕利孔二氧化碳注入诱发地震风险预筛查

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104239
Ryan Schultz , Antonio Pio Rinaldi , Philippe Roth , Herfried Madritsch , Thanushika Gunatilake , Stefan Wiemer
{"title":"瑞士特吕利孔二氧化碳注入诱发地震风险预筛查","authors":"Ryan Schultz ,&nbsp;Antonio Pio Rinaldi ,&nbsp;Philippe Roth ,&nbsp;Herfried Madritsch ,&nbsp;Thanushika Gunatilake ,&nbsp;Stefan Wiemer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Successful carbon injection operations depend critically on the management of risks, like induced seismicity. Here, we consider the bowtie risk management framework to organize pre-screening efforts around a prospective CO<sub>2</sub> injection operation near Trüllikon, Switzerland. First, potential barriers/threats are appraised via a literature review of the regional seismotectonics, hydrogeology, and nearby induced seismicity cases – which suggests a natural propensity for earthquakes because of the proximity to the Neuhausen Fault and a lack of effective underlying hydrogeological barriers. Next, we engineer barriers to fault reactivation by quantifying the fault slip potential. The closest (∼700 m) and most susceptible (∼3.0 km) portions of the Neuhausen Fault would require ∼1.7 MPa and ∼0.47 MPa for reactivation, respectively. The most susceptible (unknown) faults are normal slip (168° strike) that require ∼0.23 MPa for reactivation. Injection simulations indicate pressure changes on Neuhausen Fault segments of 0.01–0.05 MPa – values that are 1–2 orders-of-magnitude smaller than those needed for fault reactivation. These engineered barriers limit the potential for fault reactivation. However, if these barriers prove totally ineffective, we have also designed a traffic light protocol as a reactive mitigation measure. Forecast estimates of nuisance, damage, and fatalities are used to infer the last-possible stopping-point based on a comparison with operation-ending risks encountered at Basel and St. Gallen. This indicates a red- and yellow-lights of M<sub>W</sub> ∼2.0 and M<sub>W</sub> ∼0.0, respectively. We synthesize these disparate pre-screening analyses to recommend performance targets for real-time seismic monitoring. Future CO<sub>2</sub> operations will likely find our approach helpful for designing effective risk management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001828/pdfft?md5=e92ef989bb0045d45f28293da1f20b49&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001828-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-screening of induced seismicity risks for CO2 injection at Trüllikon, Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Schultz ,&nbsp;Antonio Pio Rinaldi ,&nbsp;Philippe Roth ,&nbsp;Herfried Madritsch ,&nbsp;Thanushika Gunatilake ,&nbsp;Stefan Wiemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Successful carbon injection operations depend critically on the management of risks, like induced seismicity. Here, we consider the bowtie risk management framework to organize pre-screening efforts around a prospective CO<sub>2</sub> injection operation near Trüllikon, Switzerland. First, potential barriers/threats are appraised via a literature review of the regional seismotectonics, hydrogeology, and nearby induced seismicity cases – which suggests a natural propensity for earthquakes because of the proximity to the Neuhausen Fault and a lack of effective underlying hydrogeological barriers. Next, we engineer barriers to fault reactivation by quantifying the fault slip potential. The closest (∼700 m) and most susceptible (∼3.0 km) portions of the Neuhausen Fault would require ∼1.7 MPa and ∼0.47 MPa for reactivation, respectively. The most susceptible (unknown) faults are normal slip (168° strike) that require ∼0.23 MPa for reactivation. Injection simulations indicate pressure changes on Neuhausen Fault segments of 0.01–0.05 MPa – values that are 1–2 orders-of-magnitude smaller than those needed for fault reactivation. These engineered barriers limit the potential for fault reactivation. However, if these barriers prove totally ineffective, we have also designed a traffic light protocol as a reactive mitigation measure. Forecast estimates of nuisance, damage, and fatalities are used to infer the last-possible stopping-point based on a comparison with operation-ending risks encountered at Basel and St. Gallen. This indicates a red- and yellow-lights of M<sub>W</sub> ∼2.0 and M<sub>W</sub> ∼0.0, respectively. We synthesize these disparate pre-screening analyses to recommend performance targets for real-time seismic monitoring. Future CO<sub>2</sub> operations will likely find our approach helpful for designing effective risk management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001828/pdfft?md5=e92ef989bb0045d45f28293da1f20b49&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001828-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001828\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成功的注碳作业关键取决于对诱发地震等风险的管理。在此,我们考虑采用弓形风险管理框架,围绕瑞士特吕利孔附近的潜在二氧化碳注入作业组织预筛选工作。首先,通过对区域地震构造、水文地质和附近诱发地震案例的文献回顾,对潜在的障碍/威胁进行评估。接下来,我们通过量化断层滑动潜能,设计出断层再活化的障碍。诺伊豪森断层最近(700 米)和最易受影响(3.0 千米)的部分分别需要 1.7 兆帕和 0.47 兆帕的压力才能重新激活。最易受影响的(未知)断层是正常滑动断层(走向 168°),重新激活所需的压力为 0.23 兆帕。注入模拟表明,诺伊豪森断层段的压力变化为 0.01-0.05 兆帕,比断层重新激活所需的压力变化小 1-2 个数量级。这些工程障碍限制了断层重新激活的可能性。不过,如果这些屏障被证明完全无效,我们还设计了一种交通灯协议作为被动缓解措施。在与巴塞尔和圣加仑的运行终结风险进行比较的基础上,利用对滋扰、损害和死亡的预测估计来推断最后可能的停止点。这表明,红灯和黄灯分别为 MW ∼ 2.0 和 MW ∼ 0.0。我们综合了这些不同的预筛选分析,为实时地震监测推荐了性能目标。未来的二氧化碳作业可能会发现我们的方法有助于设计有效的风险管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-screening of induced seismicity risks for CO2 injection at Trüllikon, Switzerland

Successful carbon injection operations depend critically on the management of risks, like induced seismicity. Here, we consider the bowtie risk management framework to organize pre-screening efforts around a prospective CO2 injection operation near Trüllikon, Switzerland. First, potential barriers/threats are appraised via a literature review of the regional seismotectonics, hydrogeology, and nearby induced seismicity cases – which suggests a natural propensity for earthquakes because of the proximity to the Neuhausen Fault and a lack of effective underlying hydrogeological barriers. Next, we engineer barriers to fault reactivation by quantifying the fault slip potential. The closest (∼700 m) and most susceptible (∼3.0 km) portions of the Neuhausen Fault would require ∼1.7 MPa and ∼0.47 MPa for reactivation, respectively. The most susceptible (unknown) faults are normal slip (168° strike) that require ∼0.23 MPa for reactivation. Injection simulations indicate pressure changes on Neuhausen Fault segments of 0.01–0.05 MPa – values that are 1–2 orders-of-magnitude smaller than those needed for fault reactivation. These engineered barriers limit the potential for fault reactivation. However, if these barriers prove totally ineffective, we have also designed a traffic light protocol as a reactive mitigation measure. Forecast estimates of nuisance, damage, and fatalities are used to infer the last-possible stopping-point based on a comparison with operation-ending risks encountered at Basel and St. Gallen. This indicates a red- and yellow-lights of MW ∼2.0 and MW ∼0.0, respectively. We synthesize these disparate pre-screening analyses to recommend performance targets for real-time seismic monitoring. Future CO2 operations will likely find our approach helpful for designing effective risk management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Putting the genie back in the bottle: Decarbonizing petroleum with direct air capture and enhanced oil recovery A conceptual evaluation of the use of Ca(OH)2 for attaining carbon capture rates of 99% in the calcium looping process Determining the dominant factors controlling mineralization in three-dimensional fracture networks Conceptual design and evaluation of membrane gas separation-based CO2 recovery unit for CO2 electrolyzers employing anion exchange membranes Enhanced cation release via acid pretreatment for gigaton-scale geologic CO2 sequestration in basalt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1