俯卧位经腰椎侧路腰椎椎间融合术的临床效果和影像学结果:单机构病例系列。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003151
Jeff Ehresman, S Harrison Farber, Madison Battista, Katriel E Lee, Bryan S Lee
{"title":"俯卧位经腰椎侧路腰椎椎间融合术的临床效果和影像学结果:单机构病例系列。","authors":"Jeff Ehresman, S Harrison Farber, Madison Battista, Katriel E Lee, Bryan S Lee","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study assessed feasibility, radiologic parameters, and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients who underwent PTP performed by a single surgeon. Data were collected including age, sex, body mass index, operative levels, retraction time, complications, radiographic measurements, and visual analog scale pain scores. Statistical analyses were performed using nonparametric Wilcoxon 2-sample tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 66 [15] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 29.3 [5.0]) underwent PTP on 173 spinal levels, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 13 (8) months. Sixty of 106 (57%) patients underwent a 1-level PTP procedure (range, 1-4 levels), most commonly on L4-5. The mean (SD) retraction time was 10.4 (3.1) minutes for L1-2, 9.7 (2.8) minutes for L2-3, 9.3 (2.3) minutes for L3-4, and 9.5 (3.2) minutes for L4-5. Adverse events included incidental anterior longitudinal ligament release (3 of 173 [2%] levels) and transient ipsilateral hip flexor weakness (1 of 106 [0.9%] patients). The mean pelvic incidence was 57°. Lumbar lordosis increased from a mean of 44° to 51° (P < .001). Pelvic tilt decreased from a mean of 20° to 12° (P < .001). Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch decreased from a mean of 13 to 5 (P < .001). Visual analog scale pain scores improved from a mean of 6 preoperatively to 5 postoperatively (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-institution patient series, the PTP approach was effective and safe for lateral lumbar fusion, with minimal complications and improved lumbar lordosis and patient-reported pain outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Results of Prone Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Institution Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Ehresman, S Harrison Farber, Madison Battista, Katriel E Lee, Bryan S Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study assessed feasibility, radiologic parameters, and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients who underwent PTP performed by a single surgeon. Data were collected including age, sex, body mass index, operative levels, retraction time, complications, radiographic measurements, and visual analog scale pain scores. Statistical analyses were performed using nonparametric Wilcoxon 2-sample tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 66 [15] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 29.3 [5.0]) underwent PTP on 173 spinal levels, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 13 (8) months. Sixty of 106 (57%) patients underwent a 1-level PTP procedure (range, 1-4 levels), most commonly on L4-5. The mean (SD) retraction time was 10.4 (3.1) minutes for L1-2, 9.7 (2.8) minutes for L2-3, 9.3 (2.3) minutes for L3-4, and 9.5 (3.2) minutes for L4-5. Adverse events included incidental anterior longitudinal ligament release (3 of 173 [2%] levels) and transient ipsilateral hip flexor weakness (1 of 106 [0.9%] patients). The mean pelvic incidence was 57°. Lumbar lordosis increased from a mean of 44° to 51° (P < .001). Pelvic tilt decreased from a mean of 20° to 12° (P < .001). Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch decreased from a mean of 13 to 5 (P < .001). Visual analog scale pain scores improved from a mean of 6 preoperatively to 5 postoperatively (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-institution patient series, the PTP approach was effective and safe for lateral lumbar fusion, with minimal complications and improved lumbar lordosis and patient-reported pain outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究评估了采用俯卧位转体(PTP)方法进行侧腰椎椎间融合术患者的可行性、放射学参数和临床疗效:本研究评估了采用俯卧位转体肌(PTP)方法进行侧腰椎椎间融合术的患者的可行性、放射学参数和临床结果:这项回顾性观察研究包括由一名外科医生实施 PTP 手术的连续患者。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、体重指数、手术级别、牵拉时间、并发症、影像学测量和视觉模拟量表疼痛评分。统计分析采用非参数 Wilcoxon 2 样本检验:共有 106 名患者(平均[标码]年龄为 66 [15] 岁;平均[标码]体重指数为 29.3 [5.0])接受了 173 个脊柱水平的 PTP,平均(标码)随访 13 (8) 个月。106名患者中有60名(57%)接受了1级PTP手术(范围为1-4级),最常见的是L4-5级。L1-2的平均(标清)回缩时间为10.4(3.1)分钟,L2-3为9.7(2.8)分钟,L3-4为9.3(2.3)分钟,L4-5为9.5(3.2)分钟。不良事件包括意外的前纵韧带松解(173 位患者中有 3 位[2%])和一过性的同侧髋屈肌无力(106 位患者中有 1 位[0.9%])。平均骨盆入度为 57°。腰椎前凸从平均 44° 增加到 51°(P < .001)。骨盆倾斜度从平均 20° 下降到 12° (P < .001)。骨盆入径-腰椎前凸不匹配度从平均 13 度下降到 5 度(P < .001)。视觉模拟量表疼痛评分从术前的平均 6 分提高到术后的 5 分(P < .001):结论:在这一单机构患者系列中,PTP方法用于侧腰椎融合术既有效又安全,并发症极少,腰椎前凸和患者报告的疼痛结果均有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Results of Prone Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Institution Case Series.

Background and objectives: This study assessed feasibility, radiologic parameters, and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients who underwent PTP performed by a single surgeon. Data were collected including age, sex, body mass index, operative levels, retraction time, complications, radiographic measurements, and visual analog scale pain scores. Statistical analyses were performed using nonparametric Wilcoxon 2-sample tests.

Results: A total of 106 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 66 [15] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 29.3 [5.0]) underwent PTP on 173 spinal levels, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 13 (8) months. Sixty of 106 (57%) patients underwent a 1-level PTP procedure (range, 1-4 levels), most commonly on L4-5. The mean (SD) retraction time was 10.4 (3.1) minutes for L1-2, 9.7 (2.8) minutes for L2-3, 9.3 (2.3) minutes for L3-4, and 9.5 (3.2) minutes for L4-5. Adverse events included incidental anterior longitudinal ligament release (3 of 173 [2%] levels) and transient ipsilateral hip flexor weakness (1 of 106 [0.9%] patients). The mean pelvic incidence was 57°. Lumbar lordosis increased from a mean of 44° to 51° (P < .001). Pelvic tilt decreased from a mean of 20° to 12° (P < .001). Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch decreased from a mean of 13 to 5 (P < .001). Visual analog scale pain scores improved from a mean of 6 preoperatively to 5 postoperatively (P < .001).

Conclusion: In this single-institution patient series, the PTP approach was effective and safe for lateral lumbar fusion, with minimal complications and improved lumbar lordosis and patient-reported pain outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Outcomes After Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas. Outcomes of Traditional Dual Growing Rods With Apical Control Techniques for the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: Comparison With Patients Treated With Traditional Dual Growing Rods Only With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Graduation. Understanding the Importance of Blood-Brain Barrier Alterations in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations and Implications for Treatment: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI-Based Prospective Study. Pathophysiology and Prevention of Ventriculostomy-Related Infections: A Review. Is It Justified to Sacrifice the Pituitary Stalk During Craniopharyngioma Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1