探索精神病住院的人格相关性:第二节人格障碍模型与人格障碍替代模型的横截面比较。

Dominika Górska, Monika Olga Jańczak
{"title":"探索精神病住院的人格相关性:第二节人格障碍模型与人格障碍替代模型的横截面比较。","authors":"Dominika Górska, Monika Olga Jańczak","doi":"10.1037/per0000682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our cross-sectional study provides a head-to-head comparison of Section II and Section III of <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic models of personality disorders (PDs) in identifying significant personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization (PH). PH is an indicator of a breakdown in one's existing ability to manage mental crisis. The sample was recruited from psychiatric clinical services (<i>N = 60</i>) as well as universities and the local community (<i>N = 49</i>). We used the Structured Clinical Interview for <i>DSM-5</i> PD (SCID-5-PD) for Section II <i>DSM-5</i> diagnosis, the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) for Criterion A and the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> (PID-5) for Criterion B. Separate logistic regressions analyses showed high discriminative utility for all diagnostic models: the number of Section II diagnosis, level of personality functioning, and five maladaptive traits (AUC between .89 and .97). Binomial logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure showed that Section II number of diagnoses revealed incremental utility over Criteria A and B in distinguishing between individuals experiencing a mental health crisis requiring PH and those not requiring immediate intervention. We conclude that each diagnostic model, when considered individually, exhibits a high degree of discriminatory performance. However, employing all these models concurrently for identifying personality correlates of PH proves impractical. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":"15 5","pages":"304-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization: A cross-sectional comparison of section ii personality disorder model and alternative model for personality disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Dominika Górska, Monika Olga Jańczak\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/per0000682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our cross-sectional study provides a head-to-head comparison of Section II and Section III of <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic models of personality disorders (PDs) in identifying significant personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization (PH). PH is an indicator of a breakdown in one's existing ability to manage mental crisis. The sample was recruited from psychiatric clinical services (<i>N = 60</i>) as well as universities and the local community (<i>N = 49</i>). We used the Structured Clinical Interview for <i>DSM-5</i> PD (SCID-5-PD) for Section II <i>DSM-5</i> diagnosis, the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) for Criterion A and the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> (PID-5) for Criterion B. Separate logistic regressions analyses showed high discriminative utility for all diagnostic models: the number of Section II diagnosis, level of personality functioning, and five maladaptive traits (AUC between .89 and .97). Binomial logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure showed that Section II number of diagnoses revealed incremental utility over Criteria A and B in distinguishing between individuals experiencing a mental health crisis requiring PH and those not requiring immediate intervention. We conclude that each diagnostic model, when considered individually, exhibits a high degree of discriminatory performance. However, employing all these models concurrently for identifying personality correlates of PH proves impractical. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality disorders\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"304-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的横断面研究对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)人格障碍(PDs)诊断模型的第二部分和第三部分进行了正面比较,以确定精神病住院(PH)的重要人格相关因素。PH 是一个人处理精神危机的现有能力崩溃的指标。我们从精神科临床服务机构(60 人)、大学和当地社区(49 人)招募样本。我们使用 DSM-5 PD 结构化临床访谈(SCID-5-PD)进行 DSM-5 第二部分的诊断,使用自我和人际功能量表(SIFS)进行标准 A 的诊断,使用 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)进行标准 B 的诊断。分别进行的逻辑回归分析表明,所有诊断模型都具有很高的区分效用:第二部分诊断的数量、人格功能水平和五个适应不良特质(AUC 在 0.89 和 0.97 之间)。采用前向逐步法的二项式逻辑回归结果显示,第二部分的诊断次数比标准 A 和标准 B 更能区分需要接受 PH 治疗的心理健康危机患者和不需要立即干预的患者。我们的结论是,每个诊断模型在单独考虑时都具有很高的区分性能。然而,同时使用所有这些模型来识别 PH 的人格相关因素证明是不切实际的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization: A cross-sectional comparison of section ii personality disorder model and alternative model for personality disorders.

Our cross-sectional study provides a head-to-head comparison of Section II and Section III of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic models of personality disorders (PDs) in identifying significant personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization (PH). PH is an indicator of a breakdown in one's existing ability to manage mental crisis. The sample was recruited from psychiatric clinical services (N = 60) as well as universities and the local community (N = 49). We used the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 PD (SCID-5-PD) for Section II DSM-5 diagnosis, the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) for Criterion A and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) for Criterion B. Separate logistic regressions analyses showed high discriminative utility for all diagnostic models: the number of Section II diagnosis, level of personality functioning, and five maladaptive traits (AUC between .89 and .97). Binomial logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure showed that Section II number of diagnoses revealed incremental utility over Criteria A and B in distinguishing between individuals experiencing a mental health crisis requiring PH and those not requiring immediate intervention. We conclude that each diagnostic model, when considered individually, exhibits a high degree of discriminatory performance. However, employing all these models concurrently for identifying personality correlates of PH proves impractical. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An exploratory study on disinhibition and interpersonal outcomes in daily life. The association between minority stressors, intraminority stressors, and borderline personality disorder symptomatology among sexual minority men. Advancing understanding of the relation between criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders and hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology: Insights from an external validity analysis. Negative affect and pain catastrophizing link borderline personality disorder to pain: Replicating and extending the borderline personality disorder-pain association. First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1