在内陆干旱地区放牧绵羊可提高牧草产量,减少产量标定的土壤二氧化碳排放量

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109573
Jiao Ning , Shanning Lou , Yarong Guo , Charles P. West , Cheng Zhang , Wanhe Zhu , Fujiang Hou
{"title":"在内陆干旱地区放牧绵羊可提高牧草产量,减少产量标定的土壤二氧化碳排放量","authors":"Jiao Ning ,&nbsp;Shanning Lou ,&nbsp;Yarong Guo ,&nbsp;Charles P. West ,&nbsp;Cheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Wanhe Zhu ,&nbsp;Fujiang Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Forage species are widely planted in arid and semi-arid agro-pastoral regions to increase livestock carrying capacity and thereby relieve excessive grazing pressure. The effect of grazing on forage yield and relevant soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in sown pastures converted from cropland remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main objective of the study was to investigate the effect of utilization methods (grazing vs. haying) on annual and perennial forage yields and soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions during the growing seasons in saline cropland soils and to derive the optimum number of continuous utilization years based on the combined consideration of forage productivity and soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Stands of annual and perennial forage species were established in a saline cropland area of northwest China in a 4-year experiment to investigate the effect of sheep grazing and haying on soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions during the growing seasons. The relationships between soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and soil properties were fitted. In addition, yield-scaled soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were used as an index to evaluate forage productivity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Grazing significantly increased the mean forage yield by 44 % and 14 % over that of haying, and significantly decreased the mean yield-scaled soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CO<sub>2</sub> emission intensity, CO<sub>2</sub>EI, kg of CO<sub>2</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup> of dry forage yield) by 36 % and 23 % over that of haying in the annual and perennial stands, respectively, from 2014 to 2017. Grazing did not differ from haying for cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux during the growing seasons in the annual forages but had 17 % lesser (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> flux in the perennial forages in 2015. A negative correlation (<em>r</em> = –0.55, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) between soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux and soil water content was found in the perennial forages but not in the annual forages. Multiple linear regression results indicated that soil temperature accounted for ≥ 72 % of the variation in soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux. Results of the structural equation model indicated, whether annual or perennial sown pastures, that grazing had the greatest positive effect on forage yield and the greatest negative effect on soil CO<sub>2</sub>EI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Grazing mainly reduced the soil CO<sub>2</sub>EI by increasing forage yield in annual sown pastures and by reducing soil respiration in perennial pastures. Grazing is the optimal approach to improving forage production while mitigating soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in sown pasture in continental arid regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 109573"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sheep grazing increases the forage yield and reduces the yield-scaled soil CO2 emissions of sown pastures in an inland arid region\",\"authors\":\"Jiao Ning ,&nbsp;Shanning Lou ,&nbsp;Yarong Guo ,&nbsp;Charles P. West ,&nbsp;Cheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Wanhe Zhu ,&nbsp;Fujiang Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Forage species are widely planted in arid and semi-arid agro-pastoral regions to increase livestock carrying capacity and thereby relieve excessive grazing pressure. The effect of grazing on forage yield and relevant soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in sown pastures converted from cropland remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main objective of the study was to investigate the effect of utilization methods (grazing vs. haying) on annual and perennial forage yields and soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions during the growing seasons in saline cropland soils and to derive the optimum number of continuous utilization years based on the combined consideration of forage productivity and soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Stands of annual and perennial forage species were established in a saline cropland area of northwest China in a 4-year experiment to investigate the effect of sheep grazing and haying on soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions during the growing seasons. The relationships between soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and soil properties were fitted. In addition, yield-scaled soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were used as an index to evaluate forage productivity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Grazing significantly increased the mean forage yield by 44 % and 14 % over that of haying, and significantly decreased the mean yield-scaled soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CO<sub>2</sub> emission intensity, CO<sub>2</sub>EI, kg of CO<sub>2</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup> of dry forage yield) by 36 % and 23 % over that of haying in the annual and perennial stands, respectively, from 2014 to 2017. Grazing did not differ from haying for cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux during the growing seasons in the annual forages but had 17 % lesser (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> flux in the perennial forages in 2015. A negative correlation (<em>r</em> = –0.55, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) between soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux and soil water content was found in the perennial forages but not in the annual forages. Multiple linear regression results indicated that soil temperature accounted for ≥ 72 % of the variation in soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux. Results of the structural equation model indicated, whether annual or perennial sown pastures, that grazing had the greatest positive effect on forage yield and the greatest negative effect on soil CO<sub>2</sub>EI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Grazing mainly reduced the soil CO<sub>2</sub>EI by increasing forage yield in annual sown pastures and by reducing soil respiration in perennial pastures. Grazing is the optimal approach to improving forage production while mitigating soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in sown pasture in continental arid regions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":\"318 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024003265\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024003265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景干旱和半干旱农牧区广泛种植贮草物种,以提高载畜量,从而缓解过度放牧的压力。本研究的主要目的是调查在盐碱耕地土壤的生长季节,利用方法(放牧与干草放牧)对一年生和多年生牧草产量和土壤二氧化碳排放量的影响,并在综合考虑牧草产量和土壤二氧化碳排放量的基础上,推导出最佳连续利用年数。方法 在中国西北盐碱耕地地区建立了一年生和多年生牧草种群,进行了为期 4 年的试验,以研究绵羊放牧和干草覆盖对生长季节土壤二氧化碳排放的影响。拟合了土壤二氧化碳通量与土壤特性之间的关系。结果从2014年到2017年,在一年生和多年生草地上,放牧比干草产量分别显著增加了44%和14%,平均产量标定的土壤二氧化碳排放量(二氧化碳排放强度,CO2EI,干草产量的二氧化碳千克/千克-1)比干草产量分别显著减少了36%和23%。在一年生牧草的生长季节,放牧与干草放牧的土壤二氧化碳累积通量没有差异,但在 2015 年,多年生牧草的土壤二氧化碳累积通量比干草放牧低 17%(P <0.05)。在多年生牧草中,土壤二氧化碳通量与土壤含水量之间呈负相关(r = -0.55,P <0.05),而在一年生牧草中则没有。多元线性回归结果表明,土壤温度占土壤二氧化碳通量变化的 ≥ 72%。结构方程模型的结果表明,无论是一年生还是多年生牧草,放牧对牧草产量的积极影响最大,而对土壤 CO2EI 的消极影响最大。在大陆干旱地区,放牧是提高牧草产量、减少播种牧草土壤二氧化碳排放的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sheep grazing increases the forage yield and reduces the yield-scaled soil CO2 emissions of sown pastures in an inland arid region

Context

Forage species are widely planted in arid and semi-arid agro-pastoral regions to increase livestock carrying capacity and thereby relieve excessive grazing pressure. The effect of grazing on forage yield and relevant soil CO2 emissions in sown pastures converted from cropland remains unclear.

Objective

The main objective of the study was to investigate the effect of utilization methods (grazing vs. haying) on annual and perennial forage yields and soil CO2 emissions during the growing seasons in saline cropland soils and to derive the optimum number of continuous utilization years based on the combined consideration of forage productivity and soil CO2 emission.

Methods

Stands of annual and perennial forage species were established in a saline cropland area of northwest China in a 4-year experiment to investigate the effect of sheep grazing and haying on soil CO2 emissions during the growing seasons. The relationships between soil CO2 fluxes and soil properties were fitted. In addition, yield-scaled soil CO2 emissions were used as an index to evaluate forage productivity.

Results

Grazing significantly increased the mean forage yield by 44 % and 14 % over that of haying, and significantly decreased the mean yield-scaled soil CO2 emissions (CO2 emission intensity, CO2EI, kg of CO2 kg−1 of dry forage yield) by 36 % and 23 % over that of haying in the annual and perennial stands, respectively, from 2014 to 2017. Grazing did not differ from haying for cumulative soil CO2 flux during the growing seasons in the annual forages but had 17 % lesser (P < 0.05) cumulative CO2 flux in the perennial forages in 2015. A negative correlation (r = –0.55, P < 0.05) between soil CO2 flux and soil water content was found in the perennial forages but not in the annual forages. Multiple linear regression results indicated that soil temperature accounted for ≥ 72 % of the variation in soil CO2 flux. Results of the structural equation model indicated, whether annual or perennial sown pastures, that grazing had the greatest positive effect on forage yield and the greatest negative effect on soil CO2EI.

Conclusion

Grazing mainly reduced the soil CO2EI by increasing forage yield in annual sown pastures and by reducing soil respiration in perennial pastures. Grazing is the optimal approach to improving forage production while mitigating soil CO2 emissions in sown pasture in continental arid regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Yield environment changes the ranking of soybean genotypes Effects of decapitation on yield-related traits of total node number per plant in soybean Influence of photothermal quotient in the critical period on yield potential of cereals–A comparison of wheat and barley Redefining soybean critical period for yield determination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1