调查中介效应的随机对照试验的统计功率和最佳设计。

IF 7.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological methods Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1037/met0000698
Zuchao Shen,Wei Li,Walter Leite
{"title":"调查中介效应的随机对照试验的统计功率和最佳设计。","authors":"Zuchao Shen,Wei Li,Walter Leite","doi":"10.1037/met0000698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mediation analyses in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can unpack potential causal pathways between interventions and outcomes and help the iterative improvement of interventions. When designing RCTs investigating these mechanisms, two key considerations are (a) the sample size needed to achieve adequate statistical power and (b) the efficient use of resources. The current study has developed closed-form statistical power formulas for RCTs investigating mediation effects with and without covariates under the Sobel and joint significance tests. The power formulas are functions of sample size, sample allocation between treatment conditions, effect sizes in the treatment-mediator and mediator-outcome paths, and other common parameters (e.g., significance level, one- or two-tailed test). The power formulas allow us to assess how covariates impact the magnitude of mediation effects and statistical power. Accounting for the potential unequal sampling costs between treatment conditions, we have further developed an optimal design framework to identify optimal sample allocations that provide the maximum statistical power under a fixed budget or use the minimum resources to achieve a target power. Illustrations show that the proposed method can identify more efficient and powerful sample allocations than conventional designs with an equal number of individuals in each treatment condition. We have implemented the methods in the R package odr to improve the accessibility of the work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical power and optimal design for randomized controlled trials investigating mediation effects.\",\"authors\":\"Zuchao Shen,Wei Li,Walter Leite\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/met0000698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mediation analyses in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can unpack potential causal pathways between interventions and outcomes and help the iterative improvement of interventions. When designing RCTs investigating these mechanisms, two key considerations are (a) the sample size needed to achieve adequate statistical power and (b) the efficient use of resources. The current study has developed closed-form statistical power formulas for RCTs investigating mediation effects with and without covariates under the Sobel and joint significance tests. The power formulas are functions of sample size, sample allocation between treatment conditions, effect sizes in the treatment-mediator and mediator-outcome paths, and other common parameters (e.g., significance level, one- or two-tailed test). The power formulas allow us to assess how covariates impact the magnitude of mediation effects and statistical power. Accounting for the potential unequal sampling costs between treatment conditions, we have further developed an optimal design framework to identify optimal sample allocations that provide the maximum statistical power under a fixed budget or use the minimum resources to achieve a target power. Illustrations show that the proposed method can identify more efficient and powerful sample allocations than conventional designs with an equal number of individuals in each treatment condition. We have implemented the methods in the R package odr to improve the accessibility of the work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":20782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000698\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000698","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随机对照试验(RCTs)中的中介分析可以揭示干预措施与结果之间的潜在因果关系,有助于干预措施的反复改进。在设计调查这些机制的随机对照试验时,有两个关键的考虑因素:(a)达到足够统计功率所需的样本量;(b)资源的有效利用。目前的研究为在索贝尔检验和联合显著性检验下调查有协方差和无协方差的中介效应的 RCT 制定了闭式统计功率公式。功率公式是样本量、治疗条件之间的样本分配、治疗-中介和中介-结果路径的效应大小以及其他常用参数(如显著性水平、单尾或双尾检验)的函数。通过功率公式,我们可以评估协变量如何影响中介效应的大小和统计功率。考虑到不同处理条件之间可能存在不平等的抽样成本,我们进一步开发了一个优化设计框架,以确定最佳的样本分配,从而在固定预算下提供最大的统计功率,或使用最少的资源达到目标功率。举例说明表明,与每个处理条件中个体数量相等的传统设计相比,所提出的方法能识别出更有效、更强大的样本分配。我们在 R 软件包 odr 中实现了这些方法,以提高工作的可访问性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statistical power and optimal design for randomized controlled trials investigating mediation effects.
Mediation analyses in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can unpack potential causal pathways between interventions and outcomes and help the iterative improvement of interventions. When designing RCTs investigating these mechanisms, two key considerations are (a) the sample size needed to achieve adequate statistical power and (b) the efficient use of resources. The current study has developed closed-form statistical power formulas for RCTs investigating mediation effects with and without covariates under the Sobel and joint significance tests. The power formulas are functions of sample size, sample allocation between treatment conditions, effect sizes in the treatment-mediator and mediator-outcome paths, and other common parameters (e.g., significance level, one- or two-tailed test). The power formulas allow us to assess how covariates impact the magnitude of mediation effects and statistical power. Accounting for the potential unequal sampling costs between treatment conditions, we have further developed an optimal design framework to identify optimal sample allocations that provide the maximum statistical power under a fixed budget or use the minimum resources to achieve a target power. Illustrations show that the proposed method can identify more efficient and powerful sample allocations than conventional designs with an equal number of individuals in each treatment condition. We have implemented the methods in the R package odr to improve the accessibility of the work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological methods
Psychological methods PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.
期刊最新文献
Item response theory-based continuous test norming. Comments on the measurement of effect sizes for indirect effects in Bayesian analysis of variance. Lagged multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis for determining leader-follower relationships within multidimensional time series. The potential of preregistration in psychology: Assessing preregistration producibility and preregistration-study consistency. Harvesting heterogeneity: Selective expertise versus machine learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1