比较 SARC-F 和 Ishii 评分在筛查 2 型糖尿病老年人肌肉疏松症中的应用:我们应该使用哪种筛查工具?

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s13410-024-01385-7
Yavuz Sultan Selim Akgul, Burcu Eren Cengiz, Gulsah Gunes Sahin, Derya Kocaslan, Neziha Ozlem Deveci, Sibel Akin
{"title":"比较 SARC-F 和 Ishii 评分在筛查 2 型糖尿病老年人肌肉疏松症中的应用:我们应该使用哪种筛查工具?","authors":"Yavuz Sultan Selim Akgul, Burcu Eren Cengiz, Gulsah Gunes Sahin, Derya Kocaslan, Neziha Ozlem Deveci, Sibel Akin","doi":"10.1007/s13410-024-01385-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Sarcopenia is common in older adults, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), highly prevalent in older adults, is a risk factor for sarcopenia. Early detection of sarcopenia is vital for the implementation of preventive and therapeutic measures.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>We aimed to compare the SARC-F questionnaire and Ishii score screening methods for sarcopenia in patients with type 2 DM.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 462 older adults with diabetes aged ≥ 60. Muscle mass and strength were assessed using the BIA device and handgrip dynamometer. Sarcopenia was defined in line with the European Sarcopenia Working Group 2 (EWGSOP2). The SARC-F questionnaire and Ishii score in screening for sarcopenia were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The median age was 72 (67–76) for males and 68 (65–74) for females. The prevalence of sarcopenia based on the Ishii score, SARC-F, and EWGSOP2 was 28.4%, 40.9%, and 61.9%, respectively. The sensitivities of Ishii score and SARC-F in screening for sarcopenia were 84% and 47%, respectively. The Ishii score and SARCF specificities were 67% and 69%, respectively. PPV and NPV for the Ishii score were 79% and 45%, respectively. The PPV and NPV for the SARC-F were 71% and 55%, respectively. The AUC values of the Ishii score and SARC-F were 0.790 and 0.598, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The Ishii score can be used in daily practice to screen for sarcopenia in older adults with type 2 DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of SARC-F and Ishii score in screening for sarcopenia in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: which screening tool should we use?\",\"authors\":\"Yavuz Sultan Selim Akgul, Burcu Eren Cengiz, Gulsah Gunes Sahin, Derya Kocaslan, Neziha Ozlem Deveci, Sibel Akin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13410-024-01385-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Sarcopenia is common in older adults, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), highly prevalent in older adults, is a risk factor for sarcopenia. Early detection of sarcopenia is vital for the implementation of preventive and therapeutic measures.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>We aimed to compare the SARC-F questionnaire and Ishii score screening methods for sarcopenia in patients with type 2 DM.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 462 older adults with diabetes aged ≥ 60. Muscle mass and strength were assessed using the BIA device and handgrip dynamometer. Sarcopenia was defined in line with the European Sarcopenia Working Group 2 (EWGSOP2). The SARC-F questionnaire and Ishii score in screening for sarcopenia were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The median age was 72 (67–76) for males and 68 (65–74) for females. The prevalence of sarcopenia based on the Ishii score, SARC-F, and EWGSOP2 was 28.4%, 40.9%, and 61.9%, respectively. The sensitivities of Ishii score and SARC-F in screening for sarcopenia were 84% and 47%, respectively. The Ishii score and SARCF specificities were 67% and 69%, respectively. PPV and NPV for the Ishii score were 79% and 45%, respectively. The PPV and NPV for the SARC-F were 71% and 55%, respectively. The AUC values of the Ishii score and SARC-F were 0.790 and 0.598, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The Ishii score can be used in daily practice to screen for sarcopenia in older adults with type 2 DM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-024-01385-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-024-01385-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肌肉疏松症在老年人中很常见,而在老年人中发病率很高的 2 型糖尿病(DM)是导致肌肉疏松症的一个危险因素。我们旨在比较 SARC-F 问卷和 Ishii 评分筛查 2 型糖尿病患者肌肉疏松症的方法。方法这项横断面研究的对象是 462 名年龄≥ 60 岁的老年糖尿病患者。使用 BIA 设备和手握式测力计评估肌肉质量和力量。肌少症的定义与欧洲肌少症工作组 2 (EWGSOP2) 一致。结果男性的中位年龄为 72(67-76)岁,女性为 68(65-74)岁。根据 Ishii 评分、SARC-F 和 EWGSOP2,肌少症的患病率分别为 28.4%、40.9% 和 61.9%。石井氏评分和 SARC-F 对筛查肌少症的敏感度分别为 84% 和 47%。石井氏评分和 SARC-F 的特异性分别为 67% 和 69%。石井氏评分的 PPV 和 NPV 分别为 79% 和 45%。SARC-F 的 PPV 和 NPV 分别为 71% 和 55%。石井氏评分和 SARC-F 的 AUC 值分别为 0.790 和 0.598。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of SARC-F and Ishii score in screening for sarcopenia in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: which screening tool should we use?

Background

Sarcopenia is common in older adults, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), highly prevalent in older adults, is a risk factor for sarcopenia. Early detection of sarcopenia is vital for the implementation of preventive and therapeutic measures.

Objective

We aimed to compare the SARC-F questionnaire and Ishii score screening methods for sarcopenia in patients with type 2 DM.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 462 older adults with diabetes aged ≥ 60. Muscle mass and strength were assessed using the BIA device and handgrip dynamometer. Sarcopenia was defined in line with the European Sarcopenia Working Group 2 (EWGSOP2). The SARC-F questionnaire and Ishii score in screening for sarcopenia were compared.

Results

The median age was 72 (67–76) for males and 68 (65–74) for females. The prevalence of sarcopenia based on the Ishii score, SARC-F, and EWGSOP2 was 28.4%, 40.9%, and 61.9%, respectively. The sensitivities of Ishii score and SARC-F in screening for sarcopenia were 84% and 47%, respectively. The Ishii score and SARCF specificities were 67% and 69%, respectively. PPV and NPV for the Ishii score were 79% and 45%, respectively. The PPV and NPV for the SARC-F were 71% and 55%, respectively. The AUC values of the Ishii score and SARC-F were 0.790 and 0.598, respectively.

Conclusion

The Ishii score can be used in daily practice to screen for sarcopenia in older adults with type 2 DM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries is the official journal of Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India. This is a peer reviewed journal and targets a readership consisting of clinicians, research workers, paramedical personnel, nutritionists and health care personnel working in the field of diabetes. Original research articles focusing on clinical and patient care issues including newer therapies and technologies as well as basic science issues in this field are considered for publication in the journal. Systematic reviews of interest to the above group of readers are also accepted.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors among Alavi Bohra adult women Enhancing comprehensive diabetic care: A smartphone fundus camera with an offline AI-powered diabetic retinopathy screening solution for physicians Usefulness of sudomotor function assessment in individuals with type-2 diabetes: A case–control study The effect of high-concentration CO2-enriched water on sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetes referred to an endocrine clinic Clinical profile of monogenic diabetes: A case series from a single South Indian diabetes clinic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1