辩论中的开放科学:区分推特上的兴趣与学术研究

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Sage Open Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1177/21582440241271300
Wei Yu, Junpeng Chen, Sanhong Deng
{"title":"辩论中的开放科学:区分推特上的兴趣与学术研究","authors":"Wei Yu, Junpeng Chen, Sanhong Deng","doi":"10.1177/21582440241271300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open science movement gains attention since it might enable a second scientific revolution that fundamentally changes research methods and standards across science. However, the discussion topics towards opens science both from the academia and the environments outside the scholarly communication process have not been formally identified. This paper contributes to that end by analyzing 145,716 open-science-related tweets and 3,200 research papers in Scopus from 2011 to 2022. The results show there is increasing interest about open science both on Twitter and from academia. There are similar foci for both the public on Twitter and the academia from Scopus, including cloud computing and COVID-19 pandemic. When the public on Twitter focus on open science events and citizen science, the scholarly research is more concerned about the detailed aspects and novel innovation in research. The findings might interest the policy-maker for offering evidence to facilitate open science policies and practices.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Science Under Debate: Disentangling the Interest on Twitter and Scholarly Research\",\"authors\":\"Wei Yu, Junpeng Chen, Sanhong Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21582440241271300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Open science movement gains attention since it might enable a second scientific revolution that fundamentally changes research methods and standards across science. However, the discussion topics towards opens science both from the academia and the environments outside the scholarly communication process have not been formally identified. This paper contributes to that end by analyzing 145,716 open-science-related tweets and 3,200 research papers in Scopus from 2011 to 2022. The results show there is increasing interest about open science both on Twitter and from academia. There are similar foci for both the public on Twitter and the academia from Scopus, including cloud computing and COVID-19 pandemic. When the public on Twitter focus on open science events and citizen science, the scholarly research is more concerned about the detailed aspects and novel innovation in research. The findings might interest the policy-maker for offering evidence to facilitate open science policies and practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sage Open\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sage Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241271300\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241271300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放科学运动备受关注,因为它可能促成第二次科学革命,从根本上改变整个科学的研究方法和标准。然而,学术界和学术交流过程之外的环境对开放科学的讨论话题尚未正式确定。本文通过分析 145716 条与开放科学相关的推文和 Scopus 2011 年至 2022 年的 3200 篇研究论文,对此做出了贡献。结果表明,推特和学术界对开放科学的兴趣与日俱增。Twitter上的公众和Scopus上的学术界都有类似的关注点,包括云计算和COVID-19大流行病。推特上的公众关注开放科学活动和公民科学,而学术研究则更关注研究的细节和新颖创新。这些发现可能会引起政策制定者的兴趣,为促进开放科学政策和实践提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open Science Under Debate: Disentangling the Interest on Twitter and Scholarly Research
Open science movement gains attention since it might enable a second scientific revolution that fundamentally changes research methods and standards across science. However, the discussion topics towards opens science both from the academia and the environments outside the scholarly communication process have not been formally identified. This paper contributes to that end by analyzing 145,716 open-science-related tweets and 3,200 research papers in Scopus from 2011 to 2022. The results show there is increasing interest about open science both on Twitter and from academia. There are similar foci for both the public on Twitter and the academia from Scopus, including cloud computing and COVID-19 pandemic. When the public on Twitter focus on open science events and citizen science, the scholarly research is more concerned about the detailed aspects and novel innovation in research. The findings might interest the policy-maker for offering evidence to facilitate open science policies and practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sage Open
Sage Open SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
721
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An exploration of positive leisure activities in Batswana families An Analysis of the Cognitive Demands of Senior High School English as a Foreign Language Textbooks in China Social Inequalities in Loneliness: Disentangling the Contributions of Education, Income, and Occupation What Makes an International Student in the U.S. Have Less Psychological Distress? Development and Validation of the Family Involvement in Graduate School (FIGS) Measure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1