中国肾内科护士对与血液透析患者讨论性功能障碍的看法:定性研究

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of renal care Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1111/jorc.12511
Lei An, Kantaporn Yodchai, Waraporn Kongsuwan
{"title":"中国肾内科护士对与血液透析患者讨论性功能障碍的看法:定性研究","authors":"Lei An, Kantaporn Yodchai, Waraporn Kongsuwan","doi":"10.1111/jorc.12511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe study underscores the crucial yet often neglected issue of sexual dysfunction in haemodialysis patients. Despite nephrology nurses'close relationships with patients, there is a significant communication gap on this topic. In China, limited research highlights the need for further study.ObjectiveTo describe the perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis.DesignA qualitative descriptive study.ParticipantsTen Chinese nephrology nurses from a tertiary public hospital in Guizhou province, China.ApproachSemistructured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. Qualitative content analysis approach was utilised in analysis.ResultsThere were five themes described: (1) lack of training in sexual education, as nephrology nurses described never being trained to manage patients' sexual health issues; (2) discomfort when discussing sexual topics, Chinese nephrology nurses found the topic of sexual dysfunction embarrassing and avoided discussing it; (3) sexual dysfunction viewed as a nonurgent topic, nephrology nurses prioritise physical health to aid patient survival; (4) belief in physicians as ultimate care advisors, nephrology nurses believed that doctors should handle discussions on sexually related topics; and (5) lack of a suitable environment for discussing sexual dysfunction, nephrology nurses viewed sex as a private matter, inappropriate for discussion in a public unit.ConclusionThe study identifies barriers to discussing sexual dysfunction in healthcare, including provider knowledge deficits, discomfort and lack of supportive environments. It recommends specialised training and conducive settings to improve communication in renal care. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions.","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Lei An, Kantaporn Yodchai, Waraporn Kongsuwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jorc.12511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe study underscores the crucial yet often neglected issue of sexual dysfunction in haemodialysis patients. Despite nephrology nurses'close relationships with patients, there is a significant communication gap on this topic. In China, limited research highlights the need for further study.ObjectiveTo describe the perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis.DesignA qualitative descriptive study.ParticipantsTen Chinese nephrology nurses from a tertiary public hospital in Guizhou province, China.ApproachSemistructured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. Qualitative content analysis approach was utilised in analysis.ResultsThere were five themes described: (1) lack of training in sexual education, as nephrology nurses described never being trained to manage patients' sexual health issues; (2) discomfort when discussing sexual topics, Chinese nephrology nurses found the topic of sexual dysfunction embarrassing and avoided discussing it; (3) sexual dysfunction viewed as a nonurgent topic, nephrology nurses prioritise physical health to aid patient survival; (4) belief in physicians as ultimate care advisors, nephrology nurses believed that doctors should handle discussions on sexually related topics; and (5) lack of a suitable environment for discussing sexual dysfunction, nephrology nurses viewed sex as a private matter, inappropriate for discussion in a public unit.ConclusionThe study identifies barriers to discussing sexual dysfunction in healthcare, including provider knowledge deficits, discomfort and lack of supportive environments. It recommends specialised training and conducive settings to improve communication in renal care. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12511\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景这项研究强调了血液透析患者性功能障碍这一至关重要但却经常被忽视的问题。尽管肾内科护士与患者关系密切,但在这一问题上仍存在很大的沟通缺口。目标描述中国肾内科护士与血液透析患者讨论性功能障碍的观点。方法使用访谈指南进行结构化访谈。采用定性内容分析法进行分析。结果描述了五个主题(1) 缺乏性教育培训,肾内科护士称从未接受过处理患者性健康问题的培训;(2) 讨论性话题时感到不适,中国肾内科护士认为性功能障碍话题令人尴尬,因此避免讨论;(3) 性功能障碍被视为非紧急话题,肾内科护士优先考虑身体健康以帮助患者生存;(4) 认为医生是最终的护理顾问,肾内科护士认为医生应该处理与性有关的话题;以及 (5) 缺乏讨论性功能障碍的合适环境,肾内科护士认为性是私人问题,不适合在公共场所讨论。结论该研究指出了在医疗保健中讨论性功能障碍的障碍,包括提供者的知识缺陷、不适感和缺乏支持性环境。研究建议通过专业培训和有利的环境来改善肾脏护理中的沟通。未来的研究应评估这些干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis: A qualitative study
BackgroundThe study underscores the crucial yet often neglected issue of sexual dysfunction in haemodialysis patients. Despite nephrology nurses'close relationships with patients, there is a significant communication gap on this topic. In China, limited research highlights the need for further study.ObjectiveTo describe the perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis.DesignA qualitative descriptive study.ParticipantsTen Chinese nephrology nurses from a tertiary public hospital in Guizhou province, China.ApproachSemistructured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. Qualitative content analysis approach was utilised in analysis.ResultsThere were five themes described: (1) lack of training in sexual education, as nephrology nurses described never being trained to manage patients' sexual health issues; (2) discomfort when discussing sexual topics, Chinese nephrology nurses found the topic of sexual dysfunction embarrassing and avoided discussing it; (3) sexual dysfunction viewed as a nonurgent topic, nephrology nurses prioritise physical health to aid patient survival; (4) belief in physicians as ultimate care advisors, nephrology nurses believed that doctors should handle discussions on sexually related topics; and (5) lack of a suitable environment for discussing sexual dysfunction, nephrology nurses viewed sex as a private matter, inappropriate for discussion in a public unit.ConclusionThe study identifies barriers to discussing sexual dysfunction in healthcare, including provider knowledge deficits, discomfort and lack of supportive environments. It recommends specialised training and conducive settings to improve communication in renal care. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of renal care
Journal of renal care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA). The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given. The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis: A qualitative study Self-efficacy and home dialysis: An integrative review. Understanding nurses' perceptions of sexual health and function in people requiring haemodialysis. Issue Information: Journal of Renal Care 3/2024 Young adults with kidney failure lived experiences of kidney replacement therapy decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1