碳社会成本的趋势和偏差

Richard S. J. Tol
{"title":"碳社会成本的趋势和偏差","authors":"Richard S. J. Tol","doi":"arxiv-2409.08158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An updated and extended meta-analysis confirms that the central estimate of\nthe social cost of carbon is around $200/tC with a large, right-skewed\nuncertainty and trending up. The pure rate of time preference and the inverse\nof the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are key assumptions, the total\nimpact of 2.5K warming less so. The social cost of carbon is much higher if\nclimate change is assumed to affect economic growth rather than the level of\noutput and welfare. The literature is dominated by a relatively small network\nof authors, based in a few countries. Publication and citation bias have pushed\nthe social cost of carbon up.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"1566 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends and biases in the social cost of carbon\",\"authors\":\"Richard S. J. Tol\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An updated and extended meta-analysis confirms that the central estimate of\\nthe social cost of carbon is around $200/tC with a large, right-skewed\\nuncertainty and trending up. The pure rate of time preference and the inverse\\nof the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are key assumptions, the total\\nimpact of 2.5K warming less so. The social cost of carbon is much higher if\\nclimate change is assumed to affect economic growth rather than the level of\\noutput and welfare. The literature is dominated by a relatively small network\\nof authors, based in a few countries. Publication and citation bias have pushed\\nthe social cost of carbon up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"1566 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经过更新和扩展的荟萃分析证实,碳社会成本的中心估计值约为 200 美元/吨碳,具有较大的右旋不确定性,并呈上升趋势。纯时间偏好率和跨期替代弹性的反比是关键假设,而 2.5K 升温的总影响则不太重要。如果假定气候变化影响的是经济增长而不是产出和福利水平,那么碳的社会成本就会高得多。文献主要由少数几个国家相对较小的作者网络撰写。出版和引用偏差推高了碳的社会成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends and biases in the social cost of carbon
An updated and extended meta-analysis confirms that the central estimate of the social cost of carbon is around $200/tC with a large, right-skewed uncertainty and trending up. The pure rate of time preference and the inverse of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are key assumptions, the total impact of 2.5K warming less so. The social cost of carbon is much higher if climate change is assumed to affect economic growth rather than the level of output and welfare. The literature is dominated by a relatively small network of authors, based in a few countries. Publication and citation bias have pushed the social cost of carbon up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simple robust two-stage estimation and inference for generalized impulse responses and multi-horizon causality GPT takes the SAT: Tracing changes in Test Difficulty and Math Performance of Students A Simple and Adaptive Confidence Interval when Nuisance Parameters Satisfy an Inequality Why you should also use OLS estimation of tail exponents On LASSO Inference for High Dimensional Predictive Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1