患者专用孔径准直器和多叶准直器在线性扫描质子疗法中的应用

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the Korean Physical Society Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s40042-024-01166-9
Mincheol Ko, Chanil Jeon, Sung Hwan Ahn, Youngyih Han, Kwangzoo Chung, Sungkoo Cho, Kwanghyun Jo, Eun Hyuk Shin, Sehyoung Lee, WooJin Lee, Yoonjin Oh, Juhye Kim, Seokyoon Kang, Hee Chul Park, Kisung Lee
{"title":"患者专用孔径准直器和多叶准直器在线性扫描质子疗法中的应用","authors":"Mincheol Ko,&nbsp;Chanil Jeon,&nbsp;Sung Hwan Ahn,&nbsp;Youngyih Han,&nbsp;Kwangzoo Chung,&nbsp;Sungkoo Cho,&nbsp;Kwanghyun Jo,&nbsp;Eun Hyuk Shin,&nbsp;Sehyoung Lee,&nbsp;WooJin Lee,&nbsp;Yoonjin Oh,&nbsp;Juhye Kim,&nbsp;Seokyoon Kang,&nbsp;Hee Chul Park,&nbsp;Kisung Lee","doi":"10.1007/s40042-024-01166-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scanning proton therapy offers advantages over conventional photon therapy due to the Bragg-peak effect and superior dosimetric precision. Compared with passive methods, however, scanning proton therapy tends to exhibit a wider penumbra in the low-energy range. To address this issue, the present study evaluated the effectiveness of a patient-specific aperture collimator (AC) and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) for the line proton scanning treatment system at the Samsung Proton Therapy Center in Korea. The penumbra reduction efficiency of the collimation devices and the neutron dose was assessed through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The clinical effectiveness was evaluated dosimetrically and by assessing quality assurance. Through the MC calculation, the AC displayed the highest efficiency in penumbra reduction (43.75% of no collimator’s penumbra width at a depth of 10 cm with a 150 MeV proton beam), while the MLC also presented a comparable effect (56.25%). The neutron dose was compared at varying distances from the field edge. The neutron dose was higher in the order of AC(+ 11.96%p), MLC(+ 2.61%p), and no collimator at the 10 cm distance from field edge. For the dosimetric study, treatment plans for the nasal cavity, prostate, liver, lungs, and breasts were generated by the treatment planning system using the MC algorithm. Three treatment plans were developed for each of these five sites: line scanning without any collimation, line scanning with patient-specific ACs, and line scanning with MLCs. These plans were then compared dosimetrically, and gamma pass-rates were measured at various depths. These multifaceted comparisons showed that the use of an AC optimized the OAR sparing effect, with an MLC having similar effects, while maintaining the same target coverage and producing less neutron dose. All measurement results demonstrated a gamma pass-rate (2%, 2 mm) of over 90%, indicating the feasibility of implementing these techniques in actual clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Physical Society","volume":"85 9","pages":"751 - 762"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of a patient-specific aperture collimator and multi-leaf collimator in line scanning proton therapy\",\"authors\":\"Mincheol Ko,&nbsp;Chanil Jeon,&nbsp;Sung Hwan Ahn,&nbsp;Youngyih Han,&nbsp;Kwangzoo Chung,&nbsp;Sungkoo Cho,&nbsp;Kwanghyun Jo,&nbsp;Eun Hyuk Shin,&nbsp;Sehyoung Lee,&nbsp;WooJin Lee,&nbsp;Yoonjin Oh,&nbsp;Juhye Kim,&nbsp;Seokyoon Kang,&nbsp;Hee Chul Park,&nbsp;Kisung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40042-024-01166-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Scanning proton therapy offers advantages over conventional photon therapy due to the Bragg-peak effect and superior dosimetric precision. Compared with passive methods, however, scanning proton therapy tends to exhibit a wider penumbra in the low-energy range. To address this issue, the present study evaluated the effectiveness of a patient-specific aperture collimator (AC) and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) for the line proton scanning treatment system at the Samsung Proton Therapy Center in Korea. The penumbra reduction efficiency of the collimation devices and the neutron dose was assessed through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The clinical effectiveness was evaluated dosimetrically and by assessing quality assurance. Through the MC calculation, the AC displayed the highest efficiency in penumbra reduction (43.75% of no collimator’s penumbra width at a depth of 10 cm with a 150 MeV proton beam), while the MLC also presented a comparable effect (56.25%). The neutron dose was compared at varying distances from the field edge. The neutron dose was higher in the order of AC(+ 11.96%p), MLC(+ 2.61%p), and no collimator at the 10 cm distance from field edge. For the dosimetric study, treatment plans for the nasal cavity, prostate, liver, lungs, and breasts were generated by the treatment planning system using the MC algorithm. Three treatment plans were developed for each of these five sites: line scanning without any collimation, line scanning with patient-specific ACs, and line scanning with MLCs. These plans were then compared dosimetrically, and gamma pass-rates were measured at various depths. These multifaceted comparisons showed that the use of an AC optimized the OAR sparing effect, with an MLC having similar effects, while maintaining the same target coverage and producing less neutron dose. All measurement results demonstrated a gamma pass-rate (2%, 2 mm) of over 90%, indicating the feasibility of implementing these techniques in actual clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Physical Society\",\"volume\":\"85 9\",\"pages\":\"751 - 762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Physical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40042-024-01166-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Physical Society","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40042-024-01166-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与传统光子疗法相比,扫描质子疗法具有布拉格峰效应和更高的剂量测定精度等优势。然而,与被动方法相比,扫描质子疗法在低能量范围内往往表现出更宽的半影。为了解决这个问题,本研究评估了韩国三星质子治疗中心的质子扫描治疗系统中患者专用孔径准直器(AC)和多叶准直器(MLC)的有效性。通过蒙特卡洛(MC)模拟评估了准直装置的半影减少效率和中子剂量。临床效果通过剂量学和质量保证评估进行了评价。通过 MC 计算,AC 在减少半影方面的效率最高(在 150 MeV 质子束作用下,10 厘米深度处的半影宽度是无准直器半影宽度的 43.75%),而 MLC 的效果也相当(56.25%)。比较了距离场边缘不同距离的中子剂量。在距离磁场边缘 10 厘米处,中子剂量依次为 AC(+ 11.96%p)、MLC(+ 2.61%p)和无准直器。在剂量测定研究中,治疗计划系统使用 MC 算法生成了鼻腔、前列腺、肝脏、肺部和乳房的治疗计划。为这五个部位分别制定了三种治疗方案:无准直的线扫描、带有患者特定 AC 的线扫描和带有 MLC 的线扫描。然后对这些方案进行剂量学比较,并测量了不同深度的伽马通过率。这些多方面的比较结果表明,使用 AC 可以优化 OAR 的疏通效果,而使用 MLC 也有类似的效果,同时还能保持相同的目标覆盖范围,并产生较少的中子剂量。所有测量结果均显示伽马通过率(2%,2 毫米)超过 90%,这表明在实际临床实践中采用这些技术是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility of a patient-specific aperture collimator and multi-leaf collimator in line scanning proton therapy

Scanning proton therapy offers advantages over conventional photon therapy due to the Bragg-peak effect and superior dosimetric precision. Compared with passive methods, however, scanning proton therapy tends to exhibit a wider penumbra in the low-energy range. To address this issue, the present study evaluated the effectiveness of a patient-specific aperture collimator (AC) and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) for the line proton scanning treatment system at the Samsung Proton Therapy Center in Korea. The penumbra reduction efficiency of the collimation devices and the neutron dose was assessed through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The clinical effectiveness was evaluated dosimetrically and by assessing quality assurance. Through the MC calculation, the AC displayed the highest efficiency in penumbra reduction (43.75% of no collimator’s penumbra width at a depth of 10 cm with a 150 MeV proton beam), while the MLC also presented a comparable effect (56.25%). The neutron dose was compared at varying distances from the field edge. The neutron dose was higher in the order of AC(+ 11.96%p), MLC(+ 2.61%p), and no collimator at the 10 cm distance from field edge. For the dosimetric study, treatment plans for the nasal cavity, prostate, liver, lungs, and breasts were generated by the treatment planning system using the MC algorithm. Three treatment plans were developed for each of these five sites: line scanning without any collimation, line scanning with patient-specific ACs, and line scanning with MLCs. These plans were then compared dosimetrically, and gamma pass-rates were measured at various depths. These multifaceted comparisons showed that the use of an AC optimized the OAR sparing effect, with an MLC having similar effects, while maintaining the same target coverage and producing less neutron dose. All measurement results demonstrated a gamma pass-rate (2%, 2 mm) of over 90%, indicating the feasibility of implementing these techniques in actual clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Korean Physical Society
Journal of the Korean Physical Society PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Korean Physical Society (JKPS) covers all fields of physics spanning from statistical physics and condensed matter physics to particle physics. The manuscript to be published in JKPS is required to hold the originality, significance, and recent completeness. The journal is composed of Full paper, Letters, and Brief sections. In addition, featured articles with outstanding results are selected by the Editorial board and introduced in the online version. For emphasis on aspect of international journal, several world-distinguished researchers join the Editorial board. High quality of papers may be express-published when it is recommended or requested.
期刊最新文献
Improved electrical conductivity of graphene film using thermal expansion-assisted hot pressing method A study on the effect of correlated data on predictive capabilities A customized template matching classification system Erratum: Comparative analysis of single and triple material 10 nm Tri-gate FinFET Revisit to the fluid Love numbers and the permanent tide of the Earth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1