{"title":"机器人辅助外周和中央淋巴手术的系统回顾","authors":"Imholz Carlotta, Grünherz Lisanne, Lindenblatt Nicole","doi":"10.1002/jso.27866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundRobotic‐assisted lymphatic reconstruction has gained increasing interest over the past few years.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically investigate the benefits of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery based on currently published literature.MethodsA systematic review evaluating the feasibility, surgical aspects, and both objective and subjective improvements in patients with impairment of the peripheral or central lymphatic system was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO.ResultsThe literature search yielded 328 articles after the removal of duplicates, followed by a full‐text review of the 29 articles, out of which a total of 11 relevant articles were deemed eligible. Among these, seven used a retrospective design and four a prospective design. All studies included confirmed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery and reported promising results concerning both technical aspects and patient‐related outcomes. However, currently, only a limited number of studies directly compare the robotic‐assisted approach to the manual approach, and these studies have limited statistical analyses.ConclusionDespite the heterogeneous measurands, all studies showed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery, and seven provided promising data on patient‐related outcomes. Additional studies are needed to further identify future directions in robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Robotic‐Assisted Peripheral and Central Lymphatic Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Imholz Carlotta, Grünherz Lisanne, Lindenblatt Nicole\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.27866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundRobotic‐assisted lymphatic reconstruction has gained increasing interest over the past few years.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically investigate the benefits of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery based on currently published literature.MethodsA systematic review evaluating the feasibility, surgical aspects, and both objective and subjective improvements in patients with impairment of the peripheral or central lymphatic system was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO.ResultsThe literature search yielded 328 articles after the removal of duplicates, followed by a full‐text review of the 29 articles, out of which a total of 11 relevant articles were deemed eligible. Among these, seven used a retrospective design and four a prospective design. All studies included confirmed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery and reported promising results concerning both technical aspects and patient‐related outcomes. However, currently, only a limited number of studies directly compare the robotic‐assisted approach to the manual approach, and these studies have limited statistical analyses.ConclusionDespite the heterogeneous measurands, all studies showed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery, and seven provided promising data on patient‐related outcomes. Additional studies are needed to further identify future directions in robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27866\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic Review of Robotic‐Assisted Peripheral and Central Lymphatic Surgery
BackgroundRobotic‐assisted lymphatic reconstruction has gained increasing interest over the past few years.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically investigate the benefits of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery based on currently published literature.MethodsA systematic review evaluating the feasibility, surgical aspects, and both objective and subjective improvements in patients with impairment of the peripheral or central lymphatic system was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO.ResultsThe literature search yielded 328 articles after the removal of duplicates, followed by a full‐text review of the 29 articles, out of which a total of 11 relevant articles were deemed eligible. Among these, seven used a retrospective design and four a prospective design. All studies included confirmed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery and reported promising results concerning both technical aspects and patient‐related outcomes. However, currently, only a limited number of studies directly compare the robotic‐assisted approach to the manual approach, and these studies have limited statistical analyses.ConclusionDespite the heterogeneous measurands, all studies showed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery, and seven provided promising data on patient‐related outcomes. Additional studies are needed to further identify future directions in robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.