拟议的预凝固预剪切冲洗(P.P.F)测试程序与冲洗程序在测量排水残余强度方面的比较

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Arabian Journal of Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4
Djamel Eddine Djaafri, Mohamed Salah Nouaouria
{"title":"拟议的预凝固预剪切冲洗(P.P.F)测试程序与冲洗程序在测量排水残余强度方面的比较","authors":"Djamel Eddine Djaafri,&nbsp;Mohamed Salah Nouaouria","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to its simple design and cost-effectiveness, Bromhead ring shear apparatus is widely used to assess the drained residual strength through various testing procedures such as single stage, preshearing, and multistage. However, when compared to back-calculated case histories, values obtained through these testing procedures were found to be higher due to wall friction. To address this, Stark and Vettel (Geotech Test J 15:24–32, 1992) have introduced the “Flush testing procedure” which involves adding remolded soil to the specimen and reconsolidate it, in order to minimize the wall friction. Although the procedure yielded satisfactory results, it is more time-consuming. This paper presents a comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) and flush testing procedures. The test results showed that this procedure has successfully minimized the effect of wall friction, providing values lower than those obtained using the flush procedure in shorter time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) testing procedure and flush procedure to measure the drained residual strength\",\"authors\":\"Djamel Eddine Djaafri,&nbsp;Mohamed Salah Nouaouria\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Due to its simple design and cost-effectiveness, Bromhead ring shear apparatus is widely used to assess the drained residual strength through various testing procedures such as single stage, preshearing, and multistage. However, when compared to back-calculated case histories, values obtained through these testing procedures were found to be higher due to wall friction. To address this, Stark and Vettel (Geotech Test J 15:24–32, 1992) have introduced the “Flush testing procedure” which involves adding remolded soil to the specimen and reconsolidate it, in order to minimize the wall friction. Although the procedure yielded satisfactory results, it is more time-consuming. This paper presents a comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) and flush testing procedures. The test results showed that this procedure has successfully minimized the effect of wall friction, providing values lower than those obtained using the flush procedure in shorter time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabian Journal of Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8270,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabian Journal of Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于设计简单、成本效益高,布罗姆海德环剪设备被广泛用于通过单级、预剪和多级等各种测试程序评估排水残余强度。然而,与反向计算的案例历史相比,通过这些测试程序获得的数值会因岩壁摩擦而偏高。为了解决这个问题,Stark 和 Vettel(《土工试验 J》15:24-32,1992 年)引入了 "齐平试验程序",即在试样中加入重塑土壤并重新固结,以尽量减少壁面摩擦。虽然该程序取得了令人满意的结果,但比较耗时。本文对拟议的预固结预剪切齐平(P.P.F)和齐平测试程序进行了比较。测试结果表明,该程序成功地将壁面摩擦的影响降到了最低,在更短的时间内提供了比使用冲洗程序获得的值更低的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) testing procedure and flush procedure to measure the drained residual strength

Due to its simple design and cost-effectiveness, Bromhead ring shear apparatus is widely used to assess the drained residual strength through various testing procedures such as single stage, preshearing, and multistage. However, when compared to back-calculated case histories, values obtained through these testing procedures were found to be higher due to wall friction. To address this, Stark and Vettel (Geotech Test J 15:24–32, 1992) have introduced the “Flush testing procedure” which involves adding remolded soil to the specimen and reconsolidate it, in order to minimize the wall friction. Although the procedure yielded satisfactory results, it is more time-consuming. This paper presents a comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) and flush testing procedures. The test results showed that this procedure has successfully minimized the effect of wall friction, providing values lower than those obtained using the flush procedure in shorter time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
期刊最新文献
The combined effect of drilling fluid, in-situ stresses and inclination on wellbore stability Experimental study on the permeability evolution mechanism of fractured coal-rock combination under ground stress and gas pressure Comment on “Origin of cherts in Al Jabal al Akhdar, northeast Libya: petrographical and paleontological evidences” by Bakar et al. (2021) Geophysical modeling and reservoir performance of Aouinet Wanin F3B sandstone in well A37 NC 169A, Wafa Field, Ghadamis Basin, Libya Prognosticators for precipitation variability adopting principal component regression analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1