{"title":"拟议的预凝固预剪切冲洗(P.P.F)测试程序与冲洗程序在测量排水残余强度方面的比较","authors":"Djamel Eddine Djaafri, Mohamed Salah Nouaouria","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to its simple design and cost-effectiveness, Bromhead ring shear apparatus is widely used to assess the drained residual strength through various testing procedures such as single stage, preshearing, and multistage. However, when compared to back-calculated case histories, values obtained through these testing procedures were found to be higher due to wall friction. To address this, Stark and Vettel (Geotech Test J 15:24–32, 1992) have introduced the “Flush testing procedure” which involves adding remolded soil to the specimen and reconsolidate it, in order to minimize the wall friction. Although the procedure yielded satisfactory results, it is more time-consuming. This paper presents a comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) and flush testing procedures. The test results showed that this procedure has successfully minimized the effect of wall friction, providing values lower than those obtained using the flush procedure in shorter time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) testing procedure and flush procedure to measure the drained residual strength\",\"authors\":\"Djamel Eddine Djaafri, Mohamed Salah Nouaouria\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Due to its simple design and cost-effectiveness, Bromhead ring shear apparatus is widely used to assess the drained residual strength through various testing procedures such as single stage, preshearing, and multistage. However, when compared to back-calculated case histories, values obtained through these testing procedures were found to be higher due to wall friction. To address this, Stark and Vettel (Geotech Test J 15:24–32, 1992) have introduced the “Flush testing procedure” which involves adding remolded soil to the specimen and reconsolidate it, in order to minimize the wall friction. Although the procedure yielded satisfactory results, it is more time-consuming. This paper presents a comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) and flush testing procedures. The test results showed that this procedure has successfully minimized the effect of wall friction, providing values lower than those obtained using the flush procedure in shorter time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabian Journal of Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8270,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabian Journal of Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-024-12066-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) testing procedure and flush procedure to measure the drained residual strength
Due to its simple design and cost-effectiveness, Bromhead ring shear apparatus is widely used to assess the drained residual strength through various testing procedures such as single stage, preshearing, and multistage. However, when compared to back-calculated case histories, values obtained through these testing procedures were found to be higher due to wall friction. To address this, Stark and Vettel (Geotech Test J 15:24–32, 1992) have introduced the “Flush testing procedure” which involves adding remolded soil to the specimen and reconsolidate it, in order to minimize the wall friction. Although the procedure yielded satisfactory results, it is more time-consuming. This paper presents a comparison between a proposed preconsolidated presheared flush (P.P.F) and flush testing procedures. The test results showed that this procedure has successfully minimized the effect of wall friction, providing values lower than those obtained using the flush procedure in shorter time.
期刊介绍:
The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone.
Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.