通过 6E 学习模式中的反思策略加强 STEM 协作:语音识别分析的启示

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Information Technologies Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12957-9
Chia-Ju Lin, Hsin-Yu Lee, Wei-Sheng Wang, Yueh-Min Huang, Ting-Ting Wu
{"title":"通过 6E 学习模式中的反思策略加强 STEM 协作:语音识别分析的启示","authors":"Chia-Ju Lin, Hsin-Yu Lee, Wei-Sheng Wang, Yueh-Min Huang, Ting-Ting Wu","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12957-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In STEM hands-on learning activities, collaboration with group members can be a significant motivator for students’ engagement. This research is based on the 6E Learning by DeSIGN™ model and explores the impact of incorporating reflective strategies on students’ learning performance, motivation, and participation in collaborative STEM learning activities. Additionally, this study uses voice recognition processing technology to assess differences in collaborative discussion topics. The findings reveal that while adhering to the 6E learning framework can effectively enhance various aspects of students’ learning outcomes, the importance of reflective strategies remains paramount. Specific reflection stages can foster stronger connections and interactions among students and their learning partners. Furthermore, during the process of discussion and communication, group members gain a better understanding of the team’s shared goals, leading to heightened motivation and participation intent in contributing to the team’s success. Moreover, this study also identifies that members of groups engaged in the 6E + R learning model dedicate more time and effort to critical thinking and problem-solving during collaborative discussions, validating that collective reflective thinking within the team can assist novice learners in achieving higher-order thinking and maximizing their learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing STEM collaboration through reflective strategies in the 6E learning model: insights from voice recognition analysis\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Ju Lin, Hsin-Yu Lee, Wei-Sheng Wang, Yueh-Min Huang, Ting-Ting Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10639-024-12957-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In STEM hands-on learning activities, collaboration with group members can be a significant motivator for students’ engagement. This research is based on the 6E Learning by DeSIGN™ model and explores the impact of incorporating reflective strategies on students’ learning performance, motivation, and participation in collaborative STEM learning activities. Additionally, this study uses voice recognition processing technology to assess differences in collaborative discussion topics. The findings reveal that while adhering to the 6E learning framework can effectively enhance various aspects of students’ learning outcomes, the importance of reflective strategies remains paramount. Specific reflection stages can foster stronger connections and interactions among students and their learning partners. Furthermore, during the process of discussion and communication, group members gain a better understanding of the team’s shared goals, leading to heightened motivation and participation intent in contributing to the team’s success. Moreover, this study also identifies that members of groups engaged in the 6E + R learning model dedicate more time and effort to critical thinking and problem-solving during collaborative discussions, validating that collective reflective thinking within the team can assist novice learners in achieving higher-order thinking and maximizing their learning outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Information Technologies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Information Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12957-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12957-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在科学、技术和工程实践学习活动中,与小组成员合作是学生参与的重要动力。本研究以 6E Learning by DeSIGN™ 模型为基础,探讨了在 STEM 合作学习活动中融入反思策略对学生学习成绩、学习动机和参与度的影响。此外,本研究还利用语音识别处理技术来评估合作讨论主题的差异。研究结果表明,虽然遵循 6E 学习框架可以有效提高学生各方面的学习成果,但反思策略仍然至关重要。特定的反思阶段可以促进学生与学习伙伴之间更紧密的联系和互动。此外,在讨论和交流的过程中,小组成员能更好地理解团队的共同目标,从而提高为团队成功做出贡献的积极性和参与意识。此外,本研究还发现,参与 6E + R 学习模式的小组成员在合作讨论过程中投入了更多的时间和精力进行批判性思考和解决问题,验证了团队中的集体反思可以帮助新手学习者实现高阶思维,最大限度地提高他们的学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing STEM collaboration through reflective strategies in the 6E learning model: insights from voice recognition analysis

In STEM hands-on learning activities, collaboration with group members can be a significant motivator for students’ engagement. This research is based on the 6E Learning by DeSIGN™ model and explores the impact of incorporating reflective strategies on students’ learning performance, motivation, and participation in collaborative STEM learning activities. Additionally, this study uses voice recognition processing technology to assess differences in collaborative discussion topics. The findings reveal that while adhering to the 6E learning framework can effectively enhance various aspects of students’ learning outcomes, the importance of reflective strategies remains paramount. Specific reflection stages can foster stronger connections and interactions among students and their learning partners. Furthermore, during the process of discussion and communication, group members gain a better understanding of the team’s shared goals, leading to heightened motivation and participation intent in contributing to the team’s success. Moreover, this study also identifies that members of groups engaged in the 6E + R learning model dedicate more time and effort to critical thinking and problem-solving during collaborative discussions, validating that collective reflective thinking within the team can assist novice learners in achieving higher-order thinking and maximizing their learning outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
期刊最新文献
Development of a virtual reality creative enhancement system utilizing haptic vibration feedback via electroencephalography Is ChatGPT like a nine-year-old child in theory of mind? Evidence from Chinese writing Analysing factors influencing undergraduates’ adoption of intelligent physical education systems using an expanded TAM The importance of aligning instructor age with learning content in designing instructional videos for older adults Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1