通过独立和相互依赖的小组应急措施,提高智障成人的任务工作行为

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/bin.2049
Svetlana Daly, Katrina J. Phillips, Oliver C. Mudford, Rebecca A. Sharp
{"title":"通过独立和相互依赖的小组应急措施,提高智障成人的任务工作行为","authors":"Svetlana Daly, Katrina J. Phillips, Oliver C. Mudford, Rebecca A. Sharp","doi":"10.1002/bin.2049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We applied independent and interdependent group contingencies in a counterbalanced reversal experimental design to the vocational on‐task behavior for two groups of adults with intellectual disabilities. On‐task behavior increased for all participants in both groups above a criterion of 80% of time on‐task during both treatment phases. Independent and interdependent group contingencies were equally effective in increasing on‐task behavior. Responding was maintained at the criterion level for all members of one group at a 4‐week follow‐up. No increases in negative social interactions were observed when the interdependent group contingency was in effect and participants reported both contingencies to be socially valid. We suggest that group contingencies can be an effective intervention in increasing on‐task behavior of individuals with intellectual disabilities in vocational settings.","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent and interdependent group contingencies to increase on‐task work behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Svetlana Daly, Katrina J. Phillips, Oliver C. Mudford, Rebecca A. Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bin.2049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We applied independent and interdependent group contingencies in a counterbalanced reversal experimental design to the vocational on‐task behavior for two groups of adults with intellectual disabilities. On‐task behavior increased for all participants in both groups above a criterion of 80% of time on‐task during both treatment phases. Independent and interdependent group contingencies were equally effective in increasing on‐task behavior. Responding was maintained at the criterion level for all members of one group at a 4‐week follow‐up. No increases in negative social interactions were observed when the interdependent group contingency was in effect and participants reported both contingencies to be socially valid. We suggest that group contingencies can be an effective intervention in increasing on‐task behavior of individuals with intellectual disabilities in vocational settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对两组智障成人的职业工作任务行为进行了独立和相互依赖的分组应急设计,并采用了平衡反转实验设计。在两个治疗阶段,两组所有参与者的任务内行为都有所增加,超过了 80% 任务内时间的标准。独立和相互依赖的小组应急措施对提高任务内行为同样有效。在 4 周的随访中,一个小组的所有成员的反应都保持在标准水平。当相互依存的小组应急措施生效时,没有观察到负面社会互动的增加,参与者认为这两种应急措施在社会上都是有效的。我们认为,小组应急措施可以有效地干预智障人士在职业环境中的任务行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Independent and interdependent group contingencies to increase on‐task work behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities
We applied independent and interdependent group contingencies in a counterbalanced reversal experimental design to the vocational on‐task behavior for two groups of adults with intellectual disabilities. On‐task behavior increased for all participants in both groups above a criterion of 80% of time on‐task during both treatment phases. Independent and interdependent group contingencies were equally effective in increasing on‐task behavior. Responding was maintained at the criterion level for all members of one group at a 4‐week follow‐up. No increases in negative social interactions were observed when the interdependent group contingency was in effect and participants reported both contingencies to be socially valid. We suggest that group contingencies can be an effective intervention in increasing on‐task behavior of individuals with intellectual disabilities in vocational settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating video feedback to improve eSports performance in Street Fighter V Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness Effects of an online group‐based intervention on effort tolerance in general education Further analysis of fixed‐lean approaches to reinforcement schedule thinning Token economies: Evidence‐based recommendations for practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1