绿色创新、绿色能源和绿色制造能否成功促进生态发展?来自 20 国集团国家的证据

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environment, Development and Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s10668-024-05367-x
Mahmut Sami Duran, Şeyma Bozkaya, Mohd Ziaur Rehman, Md. Emran Hossain
{"title":"绿色创新、绿色能源和绿色制造能否成功促进生态发展?来自 20 国集团国家的证据","authors":"Mahmut Sami Duran, Şeyma Bozkaya, Mohd Ziaur Rehman, Md. Emran Hossain","doi":"10.1007/s10668-024-05367-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the contemporary world, authorities are becoming more conscious of the growth that prioritizes sustainability. This can be achieved through the use of green technology in the production process. In this context, unlike other studies, this study examines the environmental quality of G-20 countries in terms of their ecological footprint (EFP) concerning environmental technological innovation and green growth indicators (i.e., green energy, economic growth, and green production). In this study, the “continuously updated fully modified (CUP-FM)” approach was conducted using the panel data from 1992 to 2021. Besides, this study also employed the “Dumitrescu &amp; Hurlin (2012) panel causality tests” to find the causality relationship between the variables. According to the findings, a 1% increase in green energy supply leads to a 0.09% increase in EFP; therefore, dwindling overall ecological sustainability which is a surprising result for the G-20 context. Similarly, 1% increases in green innovation and green production have also been observed to increase EFP by 0.14% and 0.11%, respectively. Likewise, it was concluded that a 1% increase in economic growth increases EFP by 0.75%. The aforementioned conclusions suggest that the G-20 countries should give priority to projects related to the development of green technology, the application of strategies for sustainable economic growth, and the improvement of production efficiency to improve environmental quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":540,"journal":{"name":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are green innovation, green energy and green manufacturing successful in promoting ecological development? Evidence from G-20 countries\",\"authors\":\"Mahmut Sami Duran, Şeyma Bozkaya, Mohd Ziaur Rehman, Md. Emran Hossain\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10668-024-05367-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the contemporary world, authorities are becoming more conscious of the growth that prioritizes sustainability. This can be achieved through the use of green technology in the production process. In this context, unlike other studies, this study examines the environmental quality of G-20 countries in terms of their ecological footprint (EFP) concerning environmental technological innovation and green growth indicators (i.e., green energy, economic growth, and green production). In this study, the “continuously updated fully modified (CUP-FM)” approach was conducted using the panel data from 1992 to 2021. Besides, this study also employed the “Dumitrescu &amp; Hurlin (2012) panel causality tests” to find the causality relationship between the variables. According to the findings, a 1% increase in green energy supply leads to a 0.09% increase in EFP; therefore, dwindling overall ecological sustainability which is a surprising result for the G-20 context. Similarly, 1% increases in green innovation and green production have also been observed to increase EFP by 0.14% and 0.11%, respectively. Likewise, it was concluded that a 1% increase in economic growth increases EFP by 0.75%. The aforementioned conclusions suggest that the G-20 countries should give priority to projects related to the development of green technology, the application of strategies for sustainable economic growth, and the improvement of production efficiency to improve environmental quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment, Development and Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment, Development and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05367-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05367-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当今世界,各国政府越来越重视可持续发展。这可以通过在生产过程中使用绿色技术来实现。在此背景下,与其他研究不同的是,本研究从生态足迹(EFP)方面考察了 20 国集团国家的环境质量,涉及环境技术创新和绿色增长指标(即绿色能源、经济增长和绿色生产)。本研究采用 "连续更新完全修正(CUP-FM)"方法,使用 1992 年至 2021 年的面板数据。此外,本研究还采用了 "Dumitrescu & Hurlin(2012)面板因果检验 "来发现变量之间的因果关系。研究结果表明,绿色能源供应每增加 1%,EFP 就会增加 0.09%;因此,整体生态可持续性会下降,这对于 20 国集团来说是一个令人惊讶的结果。同样,绿色创新和绿色生产每增加 1%,EFP 也会分别增加 0.14% 和 0.11%。同样,经济增长每增加 1%,全要素生产率就会增加 0.75%。上述结论表明,二十国集团国家应优先考虑与发展绿色技术、应用可持续经济增长战略和提高生产效率以改善环境质量有关的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are green innovation, green energy and green manufacturing successful in promoting ecological development? Evidence from G-20 countries

In the contemporary world, authorities are becoming more conscious of the growth that prioritizes sustainability. This can be achieved through the use of green technology in the production process. In this context, unlike other studies, this study examines the environmental quality of G-20 countries in terms of their ecological footprint (EFP) concerning environmental technological innovation and green growth indicators (i.e., green energy, economic growth, and green production). In this study, the “continuously updated fully modified (CUP-FM)” approach was conducted using the panel data from 1992 to 2021. Besides, this study also employed the “Dumitrescu & Hurlin (2012) panel causality tests” to find the causality relationship between the variables. According to the findings, a 1% increase in green energy supply leads to a 0.09% increase in EFP; therefore, dwindling overall ecological sustainability which is a surprising result for the G-20 context. Similarly, 1% increases in green innovation and green production have also been observed to increase EFP by 0.14% and 0.11%, respectively. Likewise, it was concluded that a 1% increase in economic growth increases EFP by 0.75%. The aforementioned conclusions suggest that the G-20 countries should give priority to projects related to the development of green technology, the application of strategies for sustainable economic growth, and the improvement of production efficiency to improve environmental quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Environment, Development and Sustainability Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
754
期刊介绍: Environment, Development and Sustainability is an international and multidisciplinary journal covering all aspects of the environmental impacts of socio-economic development. It is also concerned with the complex interactions which occur between development and environment, and its purpose is to seek ways and means for achieving sustainability in all human activities aimed at such development. The subject matter of the journal includes the following and related issues: -mutual interactions among society, development and environment, and their implications for sustainable development -technical, economic, ethical and philosophical aspects of sustainable development -global sustainability - the obstacles and ways in which they could be overcome -local and regional sustainability initiatives, their practical implementation, and relevance for use in a wider context -development and application of indicators of sustainability -development, verification, implementation and monitoring of policies for sustainable development -sustainable use of land, water, energy and biological resources in development -impacts of agriculture and forestry activities on soil and aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity -effects of energy use and global climate change on development and sustainability -impacts of population growth and human activities on food and other essential resources for development -role of national and international agencies, and of international aid and trade arrangements in sustainable development -social and cultural contexts of sustainable development -role of education and public awareness in sustainable development -role of political and economic instruments in sustainable development -shortcomings of sustainable development and its alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the effects of socioeconomic, natural and landscape factors on PM2.5 concentrations from a spatial perspective Addressing the contradiction between water supply and demand: a study on multi-objective regional water resources optimization allocation Development of single and dual crop coefficients for drip-irrigated broccoli using weighing type field lysimeters in semi-arid environment Energy transition policy, cash flow uncertainty and R&D expenditures of energy enterprises Green recycling of used motor oil and steel slag aggregate in concrete
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1