长江流域生态系统服务价值的时空变化与跨区域生态补偿

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environment, Development and Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s10668-024-05376-w
Chen Chi, Juqin Shen, Xin Gao, Zhichao Li, Fuhua Sun
{"title":"长江流域生态系统服务价值的时空变化与跨区域生态补偿","authors":"Chen Chi, Juqin Shen, Xin Gao, Zhichao Li, Fuhua Sun","doi":"10.1007/s10668-024-05376-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Watershed ecological compensation (WEC) aims to enhance watershed environmental protection and ecological security. However, existing studies often ignore the integrity of large-scale watershed and regional heterogeneity in economic development when determining compensation standards and allocating funds, which makes the implementation of WEC policies difficult to achieve the desired goals. This study adopts the ecosystem services value (ESV) method to quantify the ESV changes using land use data of the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) from 2005 to 2020. On this basis, a WEC standards measurement model and a funds optimization allocation model are constructed to determine the theoretical compensation standards and actual funds allocation for eleven regions in the YRB. The results show that: (1) The land-use structure tended to be stable on the whole, with forest and grassland area exceeded 60% of the total. (2) The total ESV in the YRB exhibited a gradual decline from 16,983.19 billion CNY in 2005 to 16,333.36 billion CNY in 2015, followed by a marked increase to 17,520.45 billion CNY in 2020. (3) The theoretical compensation amounts of the entire YRB were 23.86 billion CNY in 2005, 23.46 billion CNY in 2010, 23.13 billion CNY in 2015 and 24.55 billion CNY in 2020 respectively. (4) The actual compensation funds received by the districts in the YRB were all below the theoretical WEC standards as measured by ESV outputs (35.94%, 52.22%, and 83.36%, respectively). In 2020, there was a reversal, with the actual funds reaching 1.33 times the theoretical standard. This study can provide references for governments to construct WEC programs and improve the efficiency of compensation funds applicable to large-scale watersheds.</p>","PeriodicalId":540,"journal":{"name":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services value and cross regional ecological compensation in the Yangtze River Basin\",\"authors\":\"Chen Chi, Juqin Shen, Xin Gao, Zhichao Li, Fuhua Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10668-024-05376-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Watershed ecological compensation (WEC) aims to enhance watershed environmental protection and ecological security. However, existing studies often ignore the integrity of large-scale watershed and regional heterogeneity in economic development when determining compensation standards and allocating funds, which makes the implementation of WEC policies difficult to achieve the desired goals. This study adopts the ecosystem services value (ESV) method to quantify the ESV changes using land use data of the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) from 2005 to 2020. On this basis, a WEC standards measurement model and a funds optimization allocation model are constructed to determine the theoretical compensation standards and actual funds allocation for eleven regions in the YRB. The results show that: (1) The land-use structure tended to be stable on the whole, with forest and grassland area exceeded 60% of the total. (2) The total ESV in the YRB exhibited a gradual decline from 16,983.19 billion CNY in 2005 to 16,333.36 billion CNY in 2015, followed by a marked increase to 17,520.45 billion CNY in 2020. (3) The theoretical compensation amounts of the entire YRB were 23.86 billion CNY in 2005, 23.46 billion CNY in 2010, 23.13 billion CNY in 2015 and 24.55 billion CNY in 2020 respectively. (4) The actual compensation funds received by the districts in the YRB were all below the theoretical WEC standards as measured by ESV outputs (35.94%, 52.22%, and 83.36%, respectively). In 2020, there was a reversal, with the actual funds reaching 1.33 times the theoretical standard. This study can provide references for governments to construct WEC programs and improve the efficiency of compensation funds applicable to large-scale watersheds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment, Development and Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment, Development and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05376-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05376-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流域生态补偿(WEC)旨在加强流域环境保护和生态安全。然而,现有研究在确定补偿标准和分配资金时,往往忽视了大尺度流域的完整性和经济发展的区域异质性,导致流域生态补偿政策的实施难以达到预期目标。本研究采用生态系统服务价值(ESV)方法,利用长江流域 2005-2020 年的土地利用数据,量化生态系统服务价值的变化。在此基础上,构建了水环境标准测算模型和资金优化分配模型,确定了长江流域 11 个地区的理论补偿标准和实际资金分配方案。结果表明(1)土地利用结构总体趋于稳定,林草面积占比超过 60%。(2) 长三角地区的总ESV从2005年的169,831.9亿元人民币逐渐下降到2015年的163,333.6亿元人民币,随后又明显上升到2020年的175,204.5亿元人民币。(3) 2005 年、2010 年、2015 年和 2020 年,整个长三角地区的理论补偿金额分别为 238.6 亿元、234.6 亿元、231.3 亿元和 245.5 亿元。(4) 根据 ESV 产值测算,长三角地区实际获得的补偿资金均低于理论 WEC 标准(分别为 35.94%、52.22%和 83.36%)。到了 2020 年,情况发生了逆转,实际资金达到了理论标准的 1.33 倍。本研究可为政府构建水环境容量方案、提高适用于大型流域的补偿资金效率提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services value and cross regional ecological compensation in the Yangtze River Basin

Watershed ecological compensation (WEC) aims to enhance watershed environmental protection and ecological security. However, existing studies often ignore the integrity of large-scale watershed and regional heterogeneity in economic development when determining compensation standards and allocating funds, which makes the implementation of WEC policies difficult to achieve the desired goals. This study adopts the ecosystem services value (ESV) method to quantify the ESV changes using land use data of the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) from 2005 to 2020. On this basis, a WEC standards measurement model and a funds optimization allocation model are constructed to determine the theoretical compensation standards and actual funds allocation for eleven regions in the YRB. The results show that: (1) The land-use structure tended to be stable on the whole, with forest and grassland area exceeded 60% of the total. (2) The total ESV in the YRB exhibited a gradual decline from 16,983.19 billion CNY in 2005 to 16,333.36 billion CNY in 2015, followed by a marked increase to 17,520.45 billion CNY in 2020. (3) The theoretical compensation amounts of the entire YRB were 23.86 billion CNY in 2005, 23.46 billion CNY in 2010, 23.13 billion CNY in 2015 and 24.55 billion CNY in 2020 respectively. (4) The actual compensation funds received by the districts in the YRB were all below the theoretical WEC standards as measured by ESV outputs (35.94%, 52.22%, and 83.36%, respectively). In 2020, there was a reversal, with the actual funds reaching 1.33 times the theoretical standard. This study can provide references for governments to construct WEC programs and improve the efficiency of compensation funds applicable to large-scale watersheds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Environment, Development and Sustainability Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
754
期刊介绍: Environment, Development and Sustainability is an international and multidisciplinary journal covering all aspects of the environmental impacts of socio-economic development. It is also concerned with the complex interactions which occur between development and environment, and its purpose is to seek ways and means for achieving sustainability in all human activities aimed at such development. The subject matter of the journal includes the following and related issues: -mutual interactions among society, development and environment, and their implications for sustainable development -technical, economic, ethical and philosophical aspects of sustainable development -global sustainability - the obstacles and ways in which they could be overcome -local and regional sustainability initiatives, their practical implementation, and relevance for use in a wider context -development and application of indicators of sustainability -development, verification, implementation and monitoring of policies for sustainable development -sustainable use of land, water, energy and biological resources in development -impacts of agriculture and forestry activities on soil and aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity -effects of energy use and global climate change on development and sustainability -impacts of population growth and human activities on food and other essential resources for development -role of national and international agencies, and of international aid and trade arrangements in sustainable development -social and cultural contexts of sustainable development -role of education and public awareness in sustainable development -role of political and economic instruments in sustainable development -shortcomings of sustainable development and its alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Equality and efficiency tradeoffs in revenue recycling of emission trading scheme: a case study on the recent chinese national ETS market Distributed energy infrastructure development: geospatial and economic feasibility in rural West Virginia Reverse logistics for empty pesticide containers: optimal design for sustainable management over wide areas The impact of environmental protection regulations on firms’ R&D investment: evidence from China Relationship between land urbanization and the ecosystem service value of land: evidence from Chinese land use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1