I. Alejandra Sierra Augustinus, A. Fernanda Arevalo Alvarenga, Marco Schiavon
{"title":"百慕大草球道对土壤表面活性剂和氮的各种组合的反应","authors":"I. Alejandra Sierra Augustinus, A. Fernanda Arevalo Alvarenga, Marco Schiavon","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Surfactants are commonly employed in sand-based turfgrass systems to address soil water repellency, which often results in the formation of preferential flow channels leading to non-uniform wetting patterns. While the influence of soil moisture on nutrient dynamics is well documented, the potential of surfactants to improve N uptake remains poorly understood. A 2-year study was conducted on ‘Celebration’ bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> (L.)] fairway to better understand the interaction between fertility programs (296 or 586 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> from ammonium sulfate and 564 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> primarily from a controlled-release N fertilizer) and surfactant rate and frequency (3.2 L ha<sup>−1</sup> every 14 or 28 days, or at 6.4 L ha<sup>−1</sup> every 28 days) on turfgrass performance, leaf N content, and soil moisture. Overall, no significant interaction was observed between surfactant treatment and fertility program. During the dry season (November to May), fertility programs influenced turfgrass performance parameters with higher N rates consistently leading to improvements in visual quality, normalized difference vegetation index, percent green cover, and dark green color index; however, no differences were observed during the rainy season (June to October). Surfactants showed no effect on turfgrass performance but led to minimal increase in leaf N content from 3.72% to 3.85%. All surfactant treatments reduced water drop penetration time at 0 cm. Moreover, surfactant treatments applied every 28 days regardless of the rate exhibited a higher volumetric water content compared to those applied every 14 days. Surfactant applications might not be an economically feasible strategy to improve leaf N content in South Florida well-watered bermudagrass fairways.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"2657-2669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bermudagrass fairway responses to various combinations of a soil surfactant and nitrogen\",\"authors\":\"I. Alejandra Sierra Augustinus, A. Fernanda Arevalo Alvarenga, Marco Schiavon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Surfactants are commonly employed in sand-based turfgrass systems to address soil water repellency, which often results in the formation of preferential flow channels leading to non-uniform wetting patterns. While the influence of soil moisture on nutrient dynamics is well documented, the potential of surfactants to improve N uptake remains poorly understood. A 2-year study was conducted on ‘Celebration’ bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> (L.)] fairway to better understand the interaction between fertility programs (296 or 586 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> from ammonium sulfate and 564 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> primarily from a controlled-release N fertilizer) and surfactant rate and frequency (3.2 L ha<sup>−1</sup> every 14 or 28 days, or at 6.4 L ha<sup>−1</sup> every 28 days) on turfgrass performance, leaf N content, and soil moisture. Overall, no significant interaction was observed between surfactant treatment and fertility program. During the dry season (November to May), fertility programs influenced turfgrass performance parameters with higher N rates consistently leading to improvements in visual quality, normalized difference vegetation index, percent green cover, and dark green color index; however, no differences were observed during the rainy season (June to October). Surfactants showed no effect on turfgrass performance but led to minimal increase in leaf N content from 3.72% to 3.85%. All surfactant treatments reduced water drop penetration time at 0 cm. Moreover, surfactant treatments applied every 28 days regardless of the rate exhibited a higher volumetric water content compared to those applied every 14 days. Surfactant applications might not be an economically feasible strategy to improve leaf N content in South Florida well-watered bermudagrass fairways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 6\",\"pages\":\"2657-2669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21662\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bermudagrass fairway responses to various combinations of a soil surfactant and nitrogen
Surfactants are commonly employed in sand-based turfgrass systems to address soil water repellency, which often results in the formation of preferential flow channels leading to non-uniform wetting patterns. While the influence of soil moisture on nutrient dynamics is well documented, the potential of surfactants to improve N uptake remains poorly understood. A 2-year study was conducted on ‘Celebration’ bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.)] fairway to better understand the interaction between fertility programs (296 or 586 kg N ha−1 year−1 from ammonium sulfate and 564 kg N ha−1 year−1 primarily from a controlled-release N fertilizer) and surfactant rate and frequency (3.2 L ha−1 every 14 or 28 days, or at 6.4 L ha−1 every 28 days) on turfgrass performance, leaf N content, and soil moisture. Overall, no significant interaction was observed between surfactant treatment and fertility program. During the dry season (November to May), fertility programs influenced turfgrass performance parameters with higher N rates consistently leading to improvements in visual quality, normalized difference vegetation index, percent green cover, and dark green color index; however, no differences were observed during the rainy season (June to October). Surfactants showed no effect on turfgrass performance but led to minimal increase in leaf N content from 3.72% to 3.85%. All surfactant treatments reduced water drop penetration time at 0 cm. Moreover, surfactant treatments applied every 28 days regardless of the rate exhibited a higher volumetric water content compared to those applied every 14 days. Surfactant applications might not be an economically feasible strategy to improve leaf N content in South Florida well-watered bermudagrass fairways.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.