{"title":"模拟的误校准:评论 Luebbert 和 Pachter:《蜜蜂里程表的误校准》arXiv:2405.12998v1","authors":"Geoffrey Willam Stuart","doi":"arxiv-2408.07713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this commentary I review the claim by Luebbert and Pachter\n(arXiv:2405.12998v1) that the reported R-Squared value in Srinivasan et al.\n(Science, 287(5454):851-853, 2000), describing the relationship between\ndistance to a food source and mean waggle duration of honeybee dances, was too\nhigh to be consistent with the reported means and standard deviations in the\nlatter study. There is one serious limitation of the simulations conducted by\nLuebbert and Pachter, and two flaws that compromise their findings. The\nreported R-squared value of Srinivasan. et al. is within the expected range, as\nfar as that can be determined given the limitations of the available data.","PeriodicalId":501219,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","volume":"393 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Miscalibration of simulations: A comment on Luebbert and Pachter: 'Miscalibration of the honeybee odometer' arXiv:2405.12998v1\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey Willam Stuart\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.07713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this commentary I review the claim by Luebbert and Pachter\\n(arXiv:2405.12998v1) that the reported R-Squared value in Srinivasan et al.\\n(Science, 287(5454):851-853, 2000), describing the relationship between\\ndistance to a food source and mean waggle duration of honeybee dances, was too\\nhigh to be consistent with the reported means and standard deviations in the\\nlatter study. There is one serious limitation of the simulations conducted by\\nLuebbert and Pachter, and two flaws that compromise their findings. The\\nreported R-squared value of Srinivasan. et al. is within the expected range, as\\nfar as that can be determined given the limitations of the available data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology\",\"volume\":\"393 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇评论中,我回顾了 Luebbert 和 Pachter(arXiv:2405.12998v1)的说法,即 Srinivasan 等人(《科学》,287(5454):851-853, 2000)报告的 R 平方值(描述了距离食物源的距离与蜜蜂舞蹈的平均摇摆持续时间之间的关系)过高,与后来研究中报告的平均值和标准偏差不一致。Luebbert 和 Pachter 所做的模拟有一个严重的局限性,还有两个缺陷影响了他们的研究结果。斯里尼瓦桑等人报告的 R 平方值在预期范围之内,这是在现有数据的限制下所能确定的。
Miscalibration of simulations: A comment on Luebbert and Pachter: 'Miscalibration of the honeybee odometer' arXiv:2405.12998v1
In this commentary I review the claim by Luebbert and Pachter
(arXiv:2405.12998v1) that the reported R-Squared value in Srinivasan et al.
(Science, 287(5454):851-853, 2000), describing the relationship between
distance to a food source and mean waggle duration of honeybee dances, was too
high to be consistent with the reported means and standard deviations in the
latter study. There is one serious limitation of the simulations conducted by
Luebbert and Pachter, and two flaws that compromise their findings. The
reported R-squared value of Srinivasan. et al. is within the expected range, as
far as that can be determined given the limitations of the available data.