全球农业生产力异常对灌溉和雨水灌溉农业干旱压力的响应

IF 6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Science China Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s11430-023-1328-2
Xinxin Chen, Lunche Wang, Qian Cao, Jia Sun, Zigeng Niu, Liu Yang, Weixia Jiang
{"title":"全球农业生产力异常对灌溉和雨水灌溉农业干旱压力的响应","authors":"Xinxin Chen, Lunche Wang, Qian Cao, Jia Sun, Zigeng Niu, Liu Yang, Weixia Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s11430-023-1328-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The response of agricultural productivity anomalies to drought stress plays a crucial role in the carbon cycle within terrestrial ecosystems and in ensuring food security. However, detailed analysis of how global agricultural productivity anomalies response to drought stress, particularly within irrigated and rainfed agricultural systems, remains insufficient. In this study, the impact of drought stress on agricultural productivity anomalies during the growing season (zcNDVI<sup>S</sup>), across both irrigated and rainfed agriculture, were analyzed using a suite of hydro-climatic variables. Specifically, the investigation utilized the multi-scalar Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI), and the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO). Meanwhile, the relationships between hydroclimatic variables and zcNDVI<sup>S</sup> were analyzed at one, two, three and four months before the ending of growing season (EOS). Results showed that (1) the percentages of significant (<i>p</i>&lt;0.1) drying trends varied across the globe from 8.30% to 13.42%, 6.50% to 14.63%, 6.52% to 14.23%, and 6.47% to 14.95% at one-, two-, three-, and four-month lead times before EOS, respectively, during 2001–2020, which represented by the multiscalar SPEI. This observation highlights that most regions across the globe tend to be arid, which could significantly impact agricultural productivity; (2) the global mean correlation coefficients (rmax) for SPEI-1, SPEI-3, SPEI-6, SPEI-12 (indicating SPEI at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month lags), MEI, and MJO with zcNDVI<sup>S</sup> ranged between 0.24–0.25, 0.27–0.28, 0.25–0.26, 0.21–0.22, −0.02–0.01 and 0.06–0.11, respectively, across both irrigated and rainfed agriculture system from 2001 to 2020. Agricultural productivity anomalies demonstrated a significant correlation with drought stress. The strongest correlations were noted for SPEI-3 and SPEI-6, suggesting a delayed response of crops to drought conditions. This indicates that agriculture ecosystem experiences prolonged disturbances due to abiotic drought stress; and (3) the percentages of regions that showed significant correlations (<i>p</i>&lt;0.1) between zcNDVI<sup>S</sup> and drought indices (SPEI-1, SPEI-3, SPEI-6, and SPEI-12), as well as climate indices (MEI and MJO) ranged as follows: 14.77%–20.27%, 21.51%–32.55%, 22.60%–35.68%, 21.89%–35.16%, 7.93%–11.20% and 9.44%–17.94%. Quantitatively identifying how zcNDVI<sup>S</sup> spatially responds to hydro-climatic variables can help us better understand the impact of drought on agricultural productivity anomalies worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":21651,"journal":{"name":"Science China Earth Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of global agricultural productivity anomalies to drought stress in irrigated and rainfed agriculture\",\"authors\":\"Xinxin Chen, Lunche Wang, Qian Cao, Jia Sun, Zigeng Niu, Liu Yang, Weixia Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11430-023-1328-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The response of agricultural productivity anomalies to drought stress plays a crucial role in the carbon cycle within terrestrial ecosystems and in ensuring food security. However, detailed analysis of how global agricultural productivity anomalies response to drought stress, particularly within irrigated and rainfed agricultural systems, remains insufficient. In this study, the impact of drought stress on agricultural productivity anomalies during the growing season (zcNDVI<sup>S</sup>), across both irrigated and rainfed agriculture, were analyzed using a suite of hydro-climatic variables. Specifically, the investigation utilized the multi-scalar Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI), and the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO). Meanwhile, the relationships between hydroclimatic variables and zcNDVI<sup>S</sup> were analyzed at one, two, three and four months before the ending of growing season (EOS). Results showed that (1) the percentages of significant (<i>p</i>&lt;0.1) drying trends varied across the globe from 8.30% to 13.42%, 6.50% to 14.63%, 6.52% to 14.23%, and 6.47% to 14.95% at one-, two-, three-, and four-month lead times before EOS, respectively, during 2001–2020, which represented by the multiscalar SPEI. This observation highlights that most regions across the globe tend to be arid, which could significantly impact agricultural productivity; (2) the global mean correlation coefficients (rmax) for SPEI-1, SPEI-3, SPEI-6, SPEI-12 (indicating SPEI at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month lags), MEI, and MJO with zcNDVI<sup>S</sup> ranged between 0.24–0.25, 0.27–0.28, 0.25–0.26, 0.21–0.22, −0.02–0.01 and 0.06–0.11, respectively, across both irrigated and rainfed agriculture system from 2001 to 2020. Agricultural productivity anomalies demonstrated a significant correlation with drought stress. The strongest correlations were noted for SPEI-3 and SPEI-6, suggesting a delayed response of crops to drought conditions. This indicates that agriculture ecosystem experiences prolonged disturbances due to abiotic drought stress; and (3) the percentages of regions that showed significant correlations (<i>p</i>&lt;0.1) between zcNDVI<sup>S</sup> and drought indices (SPEI-1, SPEI-3, SPEI-6, and SPEI-12), as well as climate indices (MEI and MJO) ranged as follows: 14.77%–20.27%, 21.51%–32.55%, 22.60%–35.68%, 21.89%–35.16%, 7.93%–11.20% and 9.44%–17.94%. Quantitatively identifying how zcNDVI<sup>S</sup> spatially responds to hydro-climatic variables can help us better understand the impact of drought on agricultural productivity anomalies worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science China Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science China Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1328-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science China Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1328-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业生产力异常对干旱胁迫的响应在陆地生态系统的碳循环和确保粮食安全方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,对于全球农业生产力异常如何响应干旱胁迫,特别是在灌溉和雨水灌溉农业系统中,详细分析仍然不足。本研究利用一系列水文气候变量,分析了干旱胁迫对灌溉农业和雨养农业生长季节(zcNDVIS)农业生产力异常的影响。具体而言,研究利用了多尺度标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)、多变量厄尔尼诺/南方涛动指数(MEI)和马登-朱利安涛动(MJO)。同时,分析了生长季结束前 1 个月、2 个月、3 个月和 4 个月水文气候变量与 zcNDVIS 之间的关系。结果表明:(1) 2001-2020 年间,在 EOS 结束前 1 个月、2 个月、3 个月和 4 个月,全球显著(p<0.1)的干旱趋势百分比分别为 8.30% 至 13.42%、6.50% 至 14.63%、6.52% 至 14.23% 和 6.47% 至 14.95%,这是由多尺度 SPEI 所代表的。这一观测结果表明,全球大部分地区趋于干旱,这可能会严重影响农业生产力;(2)SPEI-1、SPEI-3、SPEI-6、SPEI-12(表示滞后 1、3、6 和 12 个月的 SPEI)、MEI 和 MJO 与 zcNDVIS 的全球平均相关系数(rmax)介于 0.从 2001 年到 2020 年,在灌溉和雨水灌溉农业系统中,农业生产率异常分别介于 0.24-0.25, 0.27-0.28, 0.25-0.26, 0.21-0.22, -0.02-0.01 和 0.06-0.11 之间。农业生产力异常与干旱胁迫有显著相关性。SPEI-3和SPEI-6的相关性最强,表明作物对干旱条件的反应延迟。(3) zcNDVIS 与干旱指数(SPEI-1、SPEI-3、SPEI-6 和 SPEI-12)以及气候指数(MEI 和 MJO)之间存在显著相关性(p<0.1)的地区比例如下:14.77%-20.27%、21.51%-32.55%、22.60%-35.68%、21.89%-35.16%、7.93%-11.20% 和 9.44%-17.94%。定量识别 zcNDVIS 如何在空间上响应水文气候变量,有助于我们更好地理解干旱对全球农业生产力异常的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response of global agricultural productivity anomalies to drought stress in irrigated and rainfed agriculture

The response of agricultural productivity anomalies to drought stress plays a crucial role in the carbon cycle within terrestrial ecosystems and in ensuring food security. However, detailed analysis of how global agricultural productivity anomalies response to drought stress, particularly within irrigated and rainfed agricultural systems, remains insufficient. In this study, the impact of drought stress on agricultural productivity anomalies during the growing season (zcNDVIS), across both irrigated and rainfed agriculture, were analyzed using a suite of hydro-climatic variables. Specifically, the investigation utilized the multi-scalar Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI), and the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO). Meanwhile, the relationships between hydroclimatic variables and zcNDVIS were analyzed at one, two, three and four months before the ending of growing season (EOS). Results showed that (1) the percentages of significant (p<0.1) drying trends varied across the globe from 8.30% to 13.42%, 6.50% to 14.63%, 6.52% to 14.23%, and 6.47% to 14.95% at one-, two-, three-, and four-month lead times before EOS, respectively, during 2001–2020, which represented by the multiscalar SPEI. This observation highlights that most regions across the globe tend to be arid, which could significantly impact agricultural productivity; (2) the global mean correlation coefficients (rmax) for SPEI-1, SPEI-3, SPEI-6, SPEI-12 (indicating SPEI at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month lags), MEI, and MJO with zcNDVIS ranged between 0.24–0.25, 0.27–0.28, 0.25–0.26, 0.21–0.22, −0.02–0.01 and 0.06–0.11, respectively, across both irrigated and rainfed agriculture system from 2001 to 2020. Agricultural productivity anomalies demonstrated a significant correlation with drought stress. The strongest correlations were noted for SPEI-3 and SPEI-6, suggesting a delayed response of crops to drought conditions. This indicates that agriculture ecosystem experiences prolonged disturbances due to abiotic drought stress; and (3) the percentages of regions that showed significant correlations (p<0.1) between zcNDVIS and drought indices (SPEI-1, SPEI-3, SPEI-6, and SPEI-12), as well as climate indices (MEI and MJO) ranged as follows: 14.77%–20.27%, 21.51%–32.55%, 22.60%–35.68%, 21.89%–35.16%, 7.93%–11.20% and 9.44%–17.94%. Quantitatively identifying how zcNDVIS spatially responds to hydro-climatic variables can help us better understand the impact of drought on agricultural productivity anomalies worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science China Earth Sciences
Science China Earth Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Science China Earth Sciences, an academic journal cosponsored by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and published by Science China Press, is committed to publishing high-quality, original results in both basic and applied research.
期刊最新文献
Human disturbance exacerbated erosion and deposition in the karst peak-cluster depressions during the Ming and Qing dynasties Relationship between environmental evolution and human activities in the northeastern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau throughout the past millennium and its implications for the onset of the Anthropocene An integrated land change modeler and distributed hydrological model approach for quantifying future urban runoff dynamics First observation results of Macao Science Satellite 1 on lightning-induced electron precipitation Reconciled estimation of Antarctic ice sheet mass balance and contribution to global sea level change from 1996 to 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1