全科医生使用临床量表进行更年期管理的意愿。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Climacteric Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1080/13697137.2024.2395986
Diana Farah,Pierre-François Ceccaldi,Line Farah,Jean-Marc Ayoubi,Alexandre Vallée
{"title":"全科医生使用临床量表进行更年期管理的意愿。","authors":"Diana Farah,Pierre-François Ceccaldi,Line Farah,Jean-Marc Ayoubi,Alexandre Vallée","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2024.2395986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nThe use of digital healthcare technologies to enhance healthcare delivery has seen significant growth. However, a notable a notable research gap exists in the application of clinical scales for menopause management by general practitioners (GPs). This study aims to investigate willingness of GPs to use specific menopausal scale tools in the care of females for menopause management.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nAn anonymous online survey was developed, which received responses from 348 French GPs in 2023. Multiple backward logistic regression was performed to identify the factors influencing the willingness to use a practical menopause management scale.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn total, 87.93% of GPs are not familiar with the Greene Climacteric Scale and 90.52% are not familiar with the Menopause Quick 6 scale. In contrast, 90.52% would be interested in having access to such scales. The willingness to use a menopause management scale is associated with caring for menopausal females (odds ratio [OR] = 6.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.08-18.08], p = 0.001), less experience (OR = 7.10, 95% CI [2.05-25.22], p = 0.002), the importance of health prevention in daily practice (comparing 'very important' to 'not', OR = 12.98, 95% CI [1.68-97.60], p = 0.004) and the use of a digital scale in daily practice for menopausal management (OR = 2.13, 95% CI [1.04-5.83], p = 0.014).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nFuture research is essential in representative population to confirm these findings in menopause management.","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to use clinical scales for menopause management among general practitioners.\",\"authors\":\"Diana Farah,Pierre-François Ceccaldi,Line Farah,Jean-Marc Ayoubi,Alexandre Vallée\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13697137.2024.2395986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\r\\nThe use of digital healthcare technologies to enhance healthcare delivery has seen significant growth. However, a notable a notable research gap exists in the application of clinical scales for menopause management by general practitioners (GPs). This study aims to investigate willingness of GPs to use specific menopausal scale tools in the care of females for menopause management.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHOD\\r\\nAn anonymous online survey was developed, which received responses from 348 French GPs in 2023. Multiple backward logistic regression was performed to identify the factors influencing the willingness to use a practical menopause management scale.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nIn total, 87.93% of GPs are not familiar with the Greene Climacteric Scale and 90.52% are not familiar with the Menopause Quick 6 scale. In contrast, 90.52% would be interested in having access to such scales. The willingness to use a menopause management scale is associated with caring for menopausal females (odds ratio [OR] = 6.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.08-18.08], p = 0.001), less experience (OR = 7.10, 95% CI [2.05-25.22], p = 0.002), the importance of health prevention in daily practice (comparing 'very important' to 'not', OR = 12.98, 95% CI [1.68-97.60], p = 0.004) and the use of a digital scale in daily practice for menopausal management (OR = 2.13, 95% CI [1.04-5.83], p = 0.014).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nFuture research is essential in representative population to confirm these findings in menopause management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climacteric\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climacteric\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2024.2395986\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2024.2395986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用数字医疗保健技术来提高医疗保健服务水平的做法已取得显著增长。然而,在全科医生(GPs)应用临床量表进行更年期管理方面还存在明显的研究空白。本研究旨在调查全科医生是否愿意在女性更年期管理护理中使用特定的更年期量表工具。方法 本研究开发了一项匿名在线调查,收到了来自 2023 年 348 名法国全科医生的回复。结果共有 87.93% 的全科医生不熟悉格林 Climacteric 量表,90.52% 的全科医生不熟悉 Menopause Quick 6 量表。相比之下,90.52%的全科医生有兴趣了解这些量表。使用更年期管理量表的意愿与以下因素有关:护理更年期女性(比值比 [OR] = 6.13,95% 置信区间 [CI][2.08-18.08],p = 0.001)、经验较少(OR = 7.10,95% CI [2.05-25.22],p = 0.002)、健康预防在日常实践中的重要性(比较 "非常重要 "与 "不重要",OR = 12.98,95% CI [1.68-97.60],p = 0.004),以及在更年期管理的日常实践中使用电子秤(OR = 2.13,95% CI [1.04-5.83],p = 0.014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Willingness to use clinical scales for menopause management among general practitioners.
OBJECTIVES The use of digital healthcare technologies to enhance healthcare delivery has seen significant growth. However, a notable a notable research gap exists in the application of clinical scales for menopause management by general practitioners (GPs). This study aims to investigate willingness of GPs to use specific menopausal scale tools in the care of females for menopause management. METHOD An anonymous online survey was developed, which received responses from 348 French GPs in 2023. Multiple backward logistic regression was performed to identify the factors influencing the willingness to use a practical menopause management scale. RESULTS In total, 87.93% of GPs are not familiar with the Greene Climacteric Scale and 90.52% are not familiar with the Menopause Quick 6 scale. In contrast, 90.52% would be interested in having access to such scales. The willingness to use a menopause management scale is associated with caring for menopausal females (odds ratio [OR] = 6.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.08-18.08], p = 0.001), less experience (OR = 7.10, 95% CI [2.05-25.22], p = 0.002), the importance of health prevention in daily practice (comparing 'very important' to 'not', OR = 12.98, 95% CI [1.68-97.60], p = 0.004) and the use of a digital scale in daily practice for menopausal management (OR = 2.13, 95% CI [1.04-5.83], p = 0.014). CONCLUSION Future research is essential in representative population to confirm these findings in menopause management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climacteric
Climacteric 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women. Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments. The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.
期刊最新文献
Systemic hormone therapy after breast and gynecological cancers: an Italian expert group consensus opinion. Hyaluronic acid and erbium laser for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Low-dose and ultra-low-dose estradiol and dydrogesterone in postmenopause: an analysis by body mass index. Heartwired for change: advancing women's cardiovascular health. Physician-patient alignment on menopause-associated symptom burden: real-world evidence from the USA and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1