80 岁或以上患者心房颤动消融术的疗效和安全性

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart and Vessels Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1007/s00380-024-02458-7
Kenji Yodogawa, Yu-ki Iwasaki, Nobuaki Ito, Toshiki Arai, Masato Hachisuka, Yuhi Fujimoto, Kanako Hagiwara, Hiroshige Murata, Yoshiyasu Aizawa, Wataru Shimizu, Kuniya Asai
{"title":"80 岁或以上患者心房颤动消融术的疗效和安全性","authors":"Kenji Yodogawa, Yu-ki Iwasaki, Nobuaki Ito, Toshiki Arai, Masato Hachisuka, Yuhi Fujimoto, Kanako Hagiwara, Hiroshige Murata, Yoshiyasu Aizawa, Wataru Shimizu, Kuniya Asai","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02458-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia observed in the elderly. Its prevalence rises with age, particularly in individuals over 80 years old. While catheter ablation has emerged as a first line therapy for the patients with symptomatic AF, evidence on its application in elderly patients remains controversial. This study aimed to assess safety and efficacy outcomes of AF ablation in patients aged ≥ 80 years. Consecutive 1327 patients who underwent a first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged ≥ 80 years (elderly group, <i>n</i> = 107) were compared with patients aged &lt; 80 years (younger group, <i>n</i> = 1220). At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in AF free rate between the elderly and the younger group (72.0% vs. 73.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.786). Regarding major complications, the elderly patients had a greater incidence of periprocedural stroke (1.9% vs. 0.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.018). The rates of cardiac tamponade, phrenic palsy, and vascular complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups. PVI for AF is effective in patients aged ≥ 80 years with a similar success rate, but periprocedural stoke risk was higher compared to the younger population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with aged 80 years or older\",\"authors\":\"Kenji Yodogawa, Yu-ki Iwasaki, Nobuaki Ito, Toshiki Arai, Masato Hachisuka, Yuhi Fujimoto, Kanako Hagiwara, Hiroshige Murata, Yoshiyasu Aizawa, Wataru Shimizu, Kuniya Asai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00380-024-02458-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia observed in the elderly. Its prevalence rises with age, particularly in individuals over 80 years old. While catheter ablation has emerged as a first line therapy for the patients with symptomatic AF, evidence on its application in elderly patients remains controversial. This study aimed to assess safety and efficacy outcomes of AF ablation in patients aged ≥ 80 years. Consecutive 1327 patients who underwent a first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged ≥ 80 years (elderly group, <i>n</i> = 107) were compared with patients aged &lt; 80 years (younger group, <i>n</i> = 1220). At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in AF free rate between the elderly and the younger group (72.0% vs. 73.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.786). Regarding major complications, the elderly patients had a greater incidence of periprocedural stroke (1.9% vs. 0.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.018). The rates of cardiac tamponade, phrenic palsy, and vascular complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups. PVI for AF is effective in patients aged ≥ 80 years with a similar success rate, but periprocedural stoke risk was higher compared to the younger population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02458-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02458-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心房颤动(房颤)是老年人最常见的心律失常。其发病率随着年龄的增长而上升,尤其是在 80 岁以上的老年人中。虽然导管消融术已成为无症状房颤患者的一线治疗方法,但其在老年患者中的应用仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估心房颤动消融术在年龄≥ 80 岁患者中的安全性和疗效。研究人员对连续 1327 例因房颤首次接受肺静脉隔离术(PVI)的患者进行了回顾性分析。年龄≥80岁的患者(老年组,n = 107)与年龄< 80岁的患者(年轻组,n = 1220)进行了比较。随访一年后,老年组和年轻组的无房颤率无明显差异(72.0% vs. 73.9%,P = 0.786)。在主要并发症方面,老年患者围手术期中风的发生率更高(1.9% 对 0.1%,P = 0.018)。两组患者的心脏填塞、膈肌麻痹和血管并发症发生率无明显差异。PVI治疗房颤对年龄≥80岁的患者有效,成功率相似,但与年轻人群相比,围术期卒中风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with aged 80 years or older

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia observed in the elderly. Its prevalence rises with age, particularly in individuals over 80 years old. While catheter ablation has emerged as a first line therapy for the patients with symptomatic AF, evidence on its application in elderly patients remains controversial. This study aimed to assess safety and efficacy outcomes of AF ablation in patients aged ≥ 80 years. Consecutive 1327 patients who underwent a first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged ≥ 80 years (elderly group, n = 107) were compared with patients aged < 80 years (younger group, n = 1220). At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in AF free rate between the elderly and the younger group (72.0% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.786). Regarding major complications, the elderly patients had a greater incidence of periprocedural stroke (1.9% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.018). The rates of cardiac tamponade, phrenic palsy, and vascular complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups. PVI for AF is effective in patients aged ≥ 80 years with a similar success rate, but periprocedural stoke risk was higher compared to the younger population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Association between high plasma levels of legumain and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Changes in the diagnostic trajectory of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis over six years. Plasma microRNA-143 and microRNA-145 levels are elevated in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Bilateral pulmonary artery banding facilitates the systemic ventricular outflow tract growth for biventricular and univentricular repair candidates of complex arch anomaly. Evaluation of novel indices of walking performance taking oxygen desaturation into account during six-minute walk test in cardiovascular disease patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1