与慢性肾脏病相关的瘙痒症:使用欧洲患者报告结果电子调查比较工具及其与患者报告结果的关系

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae276
Murilo Guedes, Charlotte Tu, Nidhi Sukul, Elham Asgari, Fitsum Guebre-Egziabher, Despina Ruessmann, Thilo Schaufler, Hugh Rayner, Michel Jadoul, Laura Labriola, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Ronald L Pisoni, Angelo Karaboyas
{"title":"与慢性肾脏病相关的瘙痒症:使用欧洲患者报告结果电子调查比较工具及其与患者报告结果的关系","authors":"Murilo Guedes, Charlotte Tu, Nidhi Sukul, Elham Asgari, Fitsum Guebre-Egziabher, Despina Ruessmann, Thilo Schaufler, Hugh Rayner, Michel Jadoul, Laura Labriola, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Ronald L Pisoni, Angelo Karaboyas","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Hypothesis The associations between self-reported chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been reported using various instruments to assess itch. Data collection via multiple CKD-aP instruments allows the evaluation of different domains and measurements of CKD-aP burden and may help tailor data capture for future research or clinical care. Methods An electronic PRO (ePRO) survey was distributed to European hemodialysis (HD) patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) in 2021–2023. The DOPPS is an international cohort study that aims to investigate practice patterns and outcomes in HD patients. The ePRO survey included multiple CKD-aP instruments: average and worst itching intensity numerical rating scales (AI-NRS, WI-NRS) and a KDQOL-36 single question. Linear and logistic regression were used to estimate adjusted associations between CKD-aP instruments and various PROs. Results This analysis included 769 patients who completed the WI-NRS from HD facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. The correlation between WI-NRS and the KDQOL-36 itch question was 0.88 overall and 0.46 among patients at least somewhat bothered by itch. Mean WI-NRS scores stratified by response to the KDQOL-36 itch question were 8.1, 6.4, 4.1, and 3.1 for extremely, very much, moderately, and somewhat bothered, respectively. Patients with worse WI-NRS scores reported worse sleep quality, greater fatigue, more depressive symptoms, and lower mental and physical quality of life; these associations were similar to those observed for the KDQOL-36 itch question. Discussion Correlation between CKD-aP instruments was high overall, but moderate among the subgroup of patients bothered by itch; differences can be partially attributed to the recall period for the KDQOL-36 (4 weeks) vs. the AI- and WI-NRS (24 hours). The consistent associations of these instruments with poor outcomes underscores the importance to identify and effectively treat HD patients suffering from pruritus.","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus: a comparison of instruments and associations with patient-reported outcomes using an electronic patient reported outcome survey in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Murilo Guedes, Charlotte Tu, Nidhi Sukul, Elham Asgari, Fitsum Guebre-Egziabher, Despina Ruessmann, Thilo Schaufler, Hugh Rayner, Michel Jadoul, Laura Labriola, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Ronald L Pisoni, Angelo Karaboyas\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfae276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Hypothesis The associations between self-reported chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been reported using various instruments to assess itch. Data collection via multiple CKD-aP instruments allows the evaluation of different domains and measurements of CKD-aP burden and may help tailor data capture for future research or clinical care. Methods An electronic PRO (ePRO) survey was distributed to European hemodialysis (HD) patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) in 2021–2023. The DOPPS is an international cohort study that aims to investigate practice patterns and outcomes in HD patients. The ePRO survey included multiple CKD-aP instruments: average and worst itching intensity numerical rating scales (AI-NRS, WI-NRS) and a KDQOL-36 single question. Linear and logistic regression were used to estimate adjusted associations between CKD-aP instruments and various PROs. Results This analysis included 769 patients who completed the WI-NRS from HD facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. The correlation between WI-NRS and the KDQOL-36 itch question was 0.88 overall and 0.46 among patients at least somewhat bothered by itch. Mean WI-NRS scores stratified by response to the KDQOL-36 itch question were 8.1, 6.4, 4.1, and 3.1 for extremely, very much, moderately, and somewhat bothered, respectively. Patients with worse WI-NRS scores reported worse sleep quality, greater fatigue, more depressive symptoms, and lower mental and physical quality of life; these associations were similar to those observed for the KDQOL-36 itch question. Discussion Correlation between CKD-aP instruments was high overall, but moderate among the subgroup of patients bothered by itch; differences can be partially attributed to the recall period for the KDQOL-36 (4 weeks) vs. the AI- and WI-NRS (24 hours). The consistent associations of these instruments with poor outcomes underscores the importance to identify and effectively treat HD patients suffering from pruritus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae276\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与假设 有报告称,使用各种工具评估瘙痒时,自我报告的慢性肾脏病相关瘙痒(CKD-aP)与患者报告的结果(PROs)之间存在关联。通过多种 CKD-aP 工具收集数据可以评估 CKD-aP 负担的不同领域和测量方法,并有助于为未来的研究或临床护理调整数据采集。方法 向参加 2021-2023 年透析结果和实践模式研究(DOPPS)的欧洲血液透析(HD)患者发放电子 PRO(ePRO)调查表。DOPPS 是一项国际性队列研究,旨在调查血液透析患者的实践模式和结果。ePRO 调查包括多种 CKD-aP 工具:平均和最差瘙痒强度数字评分量表(AI-NRS、WI-NRS)以及 KDQOL-36 单个问题。采用线性回归和逻辑回归估计 CKD-aP 工具与各种 PRO 之间的调整关联。结果 该分析包括来自法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、瑞典和英国血液透析机构的 769 名完成 WI-NRS 的患者。WI-NRS 与 KDQOL-36 瘙痒问题之间的总体相关性为 0.88,在至少有点瘙痒的患者中相关性为 0.46。按照对 KDQOL-36 瘙痒问题的回答进行分层,极度、非常、中度和有点困扰的 WI-NRS 平均得分分别为 8.1、6.4、4.1 和 3.1。WI-NRS 评分较低的患者的睡眠质量较差、疲劳感较强、抑郁症状较多以及精神和身体生活质量较低;这些关联与 KDQOL-36 瘙痒问题中观察到的关联相似。讨论 总体而言,CKD-aP 工具之间的相关性较高,但在受瘙痒困扰的亚组患者中,相关性适中;差异可部分归因于 KDQOL-36 的回忆期(4 周)与 AI 和 WI-NRS 的回忆期(24 小时)。这些工具与不良预后的一致性强调了识别和有效治疗患有瘙痒症的 HD 患者的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus: a comparison of instruments and associations with patient-reported outcomes using an electronic patient reported outcome survey in Europe
Background and Hypothesis The associations between self-reported chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been reported using various instruments to assess itch. Data collection via multiple CKD-aP instruments allows the evaluation of different domains and measurements of CKD-aP burden and may help tailor data capture for future research or clinical care. Methods An electronic PRO (ePRO) survey was distributed to European hemodialysis (HD) patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) in 2021–2023. The DOPPS is an international cohort study that aims to investigate practice patterns and outcomes in HD patients. The ePRO survey included multiple CKD-aP instruments: average and worst itching intensity numerical rating scales (AI-NRS, WI-NRS) and a KDQOL-36 single question. Linear and logistic regression were used to estimate adjusted associations between CKD-aP instruments and various PROs. Results This analysis included 769 patients who completed the WI-NRS from HD facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. The correlation between WI-NRS and the KDQOL-36 itch question was 0.88 overall and 0.46 among patients at least somewhat bothered by itch. Mean WI-NRS scores stratified by response to the KDQOL-36 itch question were 8.1, 6.4, 4.1, and 3.1 for extremely, very much, moderately, and somewhat bothered, respectively. Patients with worse WI-NRS scores reported worse sleep quality, greater fatigue, more depressive symptoms, and lower mental and physical quality of life; these associations were similar to those observed for the KDQOL-36 itch question. Discussion Correlation between CKD-aP instruments was high overall, but moderate among the subgroup of patients bothered by itch; differences can be partially attributed to the recall period for the KDQOL-36 (4 weeks) vs. the AI- and WI-NRS (24 hours). The consistent associations of these instruments with poor outcomes underscores the importance to identify and effectively treat HD patients suffering from pruritus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
期刊最新文献
ERA Registry Figure of the month Heterogeneity of kidney replacement therapy incidence across Europe. Approaches to patients with obesity and CKD: focus on nutrition and surgery. GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with chronic kidney disease and either overweight or obesity. Guidelines for the management of hypertension in CKD patients: where do we stand in 2024? New approaches to acute kidney injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1