动态选择、时间不变性和变式贴现

Bach Dong-Xuan, Philippe Bich
{"title":"动态选择、时间不变性和变式贴现","authors":"Bach Dong-Xuan, Philippe Bich","doi":"arxiv-2408.05632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People often face trade-offs between costs and benefits occurring at various\npoints in time. The predominant discounting approach is to use the exponential\nform. Central to this approach is the discount rate, a unique parameter that\nconverts a future value into its present equivalent. However, a universally\naccepted discount rate remains a matter of ongoing debate and lacks consensus.\nThis paper provides a robust solution for resolving conflicts in discount\nrates, which recommends considering all discount rates but aims to assign\nvarying degrees of importance to these rates. Moreover, a considerable number\nof economists support a theory that suggests equal consideration of future and\npresent utilities. In response to this debate, we introduce a general criterion\ncapable of accommodating situations where it is feasible not to discount future\nutilities. This criterion encompasses and extends various existing criteria in\nthe literature.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic choices, temporal invariance and variational discounting\",\"authors\":\"Bach Dong-Xuan, Philippe Bich\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.05632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"People often face trade-offs between costs and benefits occurring at various\\npoints in time. The predominant discounting approach is to use the exponential\\nform. Central to this approach is the discount rate, a unique parameter that\\nconverts a future value into its present equivalent. However, a universally\\naccepted discount rate remains a matter of ongoing debate and lacks consensus.\\nThis paper provides a robust solution for resolving conflicts in discount\\nrates, which recommends considering all discount rates but aims to assign\\nvarying degrees of importance to these rates. Moreover, a considerable number\\nof economists support a theory that suggests equal consideration of future and\\npresent utilities. In response to this debate, we introduce a general criterion\\ncapable of accommodating situations where it is feasible not to discount future\\nutilities. This criterion encompasses and extends various existing criteria in\\nthe literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.05632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.05632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们经常要在不同时间点的成本和收益之间进行权衡。最主要的贴现方法是使用指数形式。这种方法的核心是贴现率,这是一个将未来值转换为现在值的独特参数。本文为解决贴现率方面的冲突提供了一个稳健的解决方案,建议考虑所有贴现率,但旨在赋予这些贴现率不同的重要程度。此外,相当多的经济学家支持一种建议平等考虑未来和现在效用的理论。针对这一争论,我们提出了一个通用标准,它能够适应不对未来效用进行贴现的情况。这一标准包含并扩展了文献中现有的各种标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamic choices, temporal invariance and variational discounting
People often face trade-offs between costs and benefits occurring at various points in time. The predominant discounting approach is to use the exponential form. Central to this approach is the discount rate, a unique parameter that converts a future value into its present equivalent. However, a universally accepted discount rate remains a matter of ongoing debate and lacks consensus. This paper provides a robust solution for resolving conflicts in discount rates, which recommends considering all discount rates but aims to assign varying degrees of importance to these rates. Moreover, a considerable number of economists support a theory that suggests equal consideration of future and present utilities. In response to this debate, we introduce a general criterion capable of accommodating situations where it is feasible not to discount future utilities. This criterion encompasses and extends various existing criteria in the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expert Classification Aggregation Approximately Optimal Auctions With a Strong Bidder Beyond Rationality: Unveiling the Role of Animal Spirits and Inflation Extrapolation in Central Bank Communication of the US The Extreme Points of Fusions A Statistical Equilibrium Approach to Adam Smith's Labor Theory of Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1