后 COVID-19 环境下物流战略框架的稳健性:印度企业的实证研究

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Studies in Business and Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.2478/sbe-2024-0029
Ali Kara, John E. Spillan, Shyam S. Prasad
{"title":"后 COVID-19 环境下物流战略框架的稳健性:印度企业的实证研究","authors":"Ali Kara, John E. Spillan, Shyam S. Prasad","doi":"10.2478/sbe-2024-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although testing the Bowersox and Daugherty (B&D) (1987) typology in international markets have provided valuable insights into the model’s relevance in logistics, literature has not re-examined the B&D model’s effectiveness during the post-pandemic business environments. The current research examines the robustness of the B&D logistics strategy framework during the post-COVID-19 Indian market environment. Using a structured questionnaire, the data for this study (n=372) was collected from the executives whose main job responsibility was related to distribution/logistics decisions in micro and small-sized (MSEs) manufacturers in India. Based on the conceptual relationships identified in the B&D typology, we used structural equation modeling to test the study hypotheses. Results show that overall logistics strategy comprised of three strategic priorities positively influences firms’ competitive responsiveness through the logistics coordination effectiveness and customer service commitment route, supporting the robustness of the model in the post COVID-19 environment. Effective logistics strategy does not occur in isolation. Emphasis in coordination and customer service must occur for a well thought out logistics strategy (process, market, and information orientation) to improve organizational competitive responsiveness in the context of Indian MSEs. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical support for the validity and the robustness of the B&D logistics strategy model during the post COVID-19 environment in an emerging market.","PeriodicalId":43310,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Business and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robustness of the Logistic Strategy Framework in Post-COVID-19 Environment: An Empirical Study of Indian Enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Ali Kara, John E. Spillan, Shyam S. Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sbe-2024-0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although testing the Bowersox and Daugherty (B&D) (1987) typology in international markets have provided valuable insights into the model’s relevance in logistics, literature has not re-examined the B&D model’s effectiveness during the post-pandemic business environments. The current research examines the robustness of the B&D logistics strategy framework during the post-COVID-19 Indian market environment. Using a structured questionnaire, the data for this study (n=372) was collected from the executives whose main job responsibility was related to distribution/logistics decisions in micro and small-sized (MSEs) manufacturers in India. Based on the conceptual relationships identified in the B&D typology, we used structural equation modeling to test the study hypotheses. Results show that overall logistics strategy comprised of three strategic priorities positively influences firms’ competitive responsiveness through the logistics coordination effectiveness and customer service commitment route, supporting the robustness of the model in the post COVID-19 environment. Effective logistics strategy does not occur in isolation. Emphasis in coordination and customer service must occur for a well thought out logistics strategy (process, market, and information orientation) to improve organizational competitive responsiveness in the context of Indian MSEs. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical support for the validity and the robustness of the B&D logistics strategy model during the post COVID-19 environment in an emerging market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Business and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Business and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2024-0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2024-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在国际市场上对 Bowersox 和 Daugherty (B&D)(1987 年)的类型学进行了测试,为该模型在物流领域的相关性提供了宝贵的见解,但文献并未重新审查 B&D 模型在大流行后的商业环境中的有效性。当前的研究考察了 B&D 物流战略框架在后 COVID-19 印度市场环境中的稳健性。本研究的数据(n=372)是通过结构化问卷从印度微型和小型(MSE)制造商中主要负责分销/物流决策的高管那里收集的。根据 B&D 类型中确定的概念关系,我们使用结构方程模型来检验研究假设。结果表明,由三个战略重点组成的总体物流战略通过物流协调有效性和客户服务承诺途径对企业的竞争响应能力产生了积极影响,从而支持了该模型在 COVID-19 后环境中的稳健性。有效的物流战略并非孤立存在。在印度微型企业的背景下,要想提高组织的竞争响应能力,就必须制定周密的物流战略(流程、市场和信息导向),强调协调和客户服务。本研究为新兴市场中后 COVID-19 环境下 B&D 物流战略模型的有效性和稳健性提供了实证支持,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robustness of the Logistic Strategy Framework in Post-COVID-19 Environment: An Empirical Study of Indian Enterprises
Although testing the Bowersox and Daugherty (B&D) (1987) typology in international markets have provided valuable insights into the model’s relevance in logistics, literature has not re-examined the B&D model’s effectiveness during the post-pandemic business environments. The current research examines the robustness of the B&D logistics strategy framework during the post-COVID-19 Indian market environment. Using a structured questionnaire, the data for this study (n=372) was collected from the executives whose main job responsibility was related to distribution/logistics decisions in micro and small-sized (MSEs) manufacturers in India. Based on the conceptual relationships identified in the B&D typology, we used structural equation modeling to test the study hypotheses. Results show that overall logistics strategy comprised of three strategic priorities positively influences firms’ competitive responsiveness through the logistics coordination effectiveness and customer service commitment route, supporting the robustness of the model in the post COVID-19 environment. Effective logistics strategy does not occur in isolation. Emphasis in coordination and customer service must occur for a well thought out logistics strategy (process, market, and information orientation) to improve organizational competitive responsiveness in the context of Indian MSEs. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical support for the validity and the robustness of the B&D logistics strategy model during the post COVID-19 environment in an emerging market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis and Classification of Corporate Fraud Based on the Literature and Investigated Cases in Romania The Impact of Digital Marketing on Consumer Behaviour Integrating Sustainability and Digitalization in Business Model Innovation. A Bibliometric Study Developing a Community-Based Participatory Research Program. From Concept to Outcomes Which Factors Help SMES’ Performance Recover Post-Pandemic? The Role of Learning Capability, Intellectual Capital, and Technological Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1