利用模糊法兰克加权评估模型对聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯废物流进行可持续管理

IF 7.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109254
{"title":"利用模糊法兰克加权评估模型对聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯废物流进行可持续管理","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The consequences for the ecosystem of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste are becoming increasingly significant and widespread. Companies managing PET waste strive to enhance sustainability in all areas. The development of systematic decision-making approaches and frameworks for PET waste management is strongly needed. This research aims to present a new methodological framework for the categorization of the most efficient PET waste management solutions. The introduced fuzzy Frank weighted sum product assessment (FWESPA) model enables rational and flexible reasoning by nonlinearly processing uncertain information. A nonlinear aggregation function is proposed for the fusion of fuzzy strategic options. It is advantageous in simulating the impact of strategic options on a final decision. An integral part of the introduced fuzzy FWESPA model is a reverse sorting algorithm. This innovative algorithm can improve the performance of traditional normalization techniques. Also, an improved fuzzy Frank ordinal priority approach linear model is formulated to define the significance of evaluation criteria. The comprehensive real-life study demonstrates the proposed decision-analytics-based approach. The results showed the following rankings of considered alternatives: “recycling” (ℤ<sub><em>A</em>2</sub> = 0.8565) &gt; “energy recovery” (ℤ<sub><em>A</em>1</sub> = 0.7364) &gt; “remanufacturing” (ℤ<sub><em>A</em>4</sub> = 0.690) &gt; “incineration” (ℤ<sub><em>A</em>3</sub> = 0.6592). Based on the results presented, alternatives “recycling” (<em>A</em><sub>2</sub>) and “energy recovery” (<em>A</em><sub>1</sub>) represent dominant alternatives with a slight advantage of recycling. Research findings can be used when deciding the appropriate way to enhance PET waste handling. The findings also describe the benefits and limitations of each treatment option for PET waste, as well as highlight the crucial challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable management of polyethylene terephthalate waste flow using a fuzzy frank weighted assessment model\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The consequences for the ecosystem of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste are becoming increasingly significant and widespread. Companies managing PET waste strive to enhance sustainability in all areas. The development of systematic decision-making approaches and frameworks for PET waste management is strongly needed. This research aims to present a new methodological framework for the categorization of the most efficient PET waste management solutions. The introduced fuzzy Frank weighted sum product assessment (FWESPA) model enables rational and flexible reasoning by nonlinearly processing uncertain information. A nonlinear aggregation function is proposed for the fusion of fuzzy strategic options. It is advantageous in simulating the impact of strategic options on a final decision. An integral part of the introduced fuzzy FWESPA model is a reverse sorting algorithm. This innovative algorithm can improve the performance of traditional normalization techniques. Also, an improved fuzzy Frank ordinal priority approach linear model is formulated to define the significance of evaluation criteria. The comprehensive real-life study demonstrates the proposed decision-analytics-based approach. The results showed the following rankings of considered alternatives: “recycling” (ℤ<sub><em>A</em>2</sub> = 0.8565) &gt; “energy recovery” (ℤ<sub><em>A</em>1</sub> = 0.7364) &gt; “remanufacturing” (ℤ<sub><em>A</em>4</sub> = 0.690) &gt; “incineration” (ℤ<sub><em>A</em>3</sub> = 0.6592). Based on the results presented, alternatives “recycling” (<em>A</em><sub>2</sub>) and “energy recovery” (<em>A</em><sub>1</sub>) represent dominant alternatives with a slight advantage of recycling. Research findings can be used when deciding the appropriate way to enhance PET waste handling. The findings also describe the benefits and limitations of each treatment option for PET waste, as well as highlight the crucial challenges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095219762401412X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095219762401412X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)废物对生态系统造成的影响日益显著和广泛。管理 PET 废弃物的公司努力提高各方面的可持续性。我们亟需为 PET 废弃物管理制定系统的决策方法和框架。本研究旨在提出一种新的方法框架,用于对最有效的 PET 废物管理解决方案进行分类。引入的模糊弗兰克加权和产品评估(FWESPA)模型通过对不确定信息进行非线性处理,实现了合理而灵活的推理。提出了一种非线性聚合函数,用于融合模糊战略选择。它有利于模拟战略选择对最终决策的影响。引入的模糊 FWESPA 模型的一个组成部分是反向排序算法。这种创新算法可以提高传统归一化技术的性能。此外,还制定了一个改进的模糊法兰克序数优先法线性模型来定义评价标准的重要性。综合实际研究证明了所提出的基于决策分析的方法。结果表明,所考虑的备选方案的排名如下:"回收"(ℤA2 = 0.8565);"能源回收"(ℤA1 = 0.7364);"再制造"(ℤA4 = 0.690);"焚烧"(ℤA3 = 0.6592)。根据上述结果,"回收利用"(A2)和 "能源回收"(A1)是占主导地位的替代品,回收利用略胜一筹。研究结果可用于决定加强 PET 废物处理的适当方法。研究结果还描述了每种 PET 废弃物处理方案的优点和局限性,并强调了关键的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainable management of polyethylene terephthalate waste flow using a fuzzy frank weighted assessment model

The consequences for the ecosystem of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste are becoming increasingly significant and widespread. Companies managing PET waste strive to enhance sustainability in all areas. The development of systematic decision-making approaches and frameworks for PET waste management is strongly needed. This research aims to present a new methodological framework for the categorization of the most efficient PET waste management solutions. The introduced fuzzy Frank weighted sum product assessment (FWESPA) model enables rational and flexible reasoning by nonlinearly processing uncertain information. A nonlinear aggregation function is proposed for the fusion of fuzzy strategic options. It is advantageous in simulating the impact of strategic options on a final decision. An integral part of the introduced fuzzy FWESPA model is a reverse sorting algorithm. This innovative algorithm can improve the performance of traditional normalization techniques. Also, an improved fuzzy Frank ordinal priority approach linear model is formulated to define the significance of evaluation criteria. The comprehensive real-life study demonstrates the proposed decision-analytics-based approach. The results showed the following rankings of considered alternatives: “recycling” (ℤA2 = 0.8565) > “energy recovery” (ℤA1 = 0.7364) > “remanufacturing” (ℤA4 = 0.690) > “incineration” (ℤA3 = 0.6592). Based on the results presented, alternatives “recycling” (A2) and “energy recovery” (A1) represent dominant alternatives with a slight advantage of recycling. Research findings can be used when deciding the appropriate way to enhance PET waste handling. The findings also describe the benefits and limitations of each treatment option for PET waste, as well as highlight the crucial challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
期刊最新文献
Solving the imbalanced dataset problem in surveillance image blur classification An interpretable precursor-driven hierarchical model for predictive aircraft safety Predictive resilience assessment featuring diffusion reconstruction for road networks under rainfall disturbances A novel solution for routing a swarm of drones operated on a mobile host Correlation mining of multimodal features based on higher-order partial least squares for emotion recognition in conversations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1