媒体报道社会灾难造成的间接创伤筛查量表(SITMES)在土耳其的有效性和可靠性

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1111/1468-5973.12616
Aysun Güzel, Selma İnfal Kesim
{"title":"媒体报道社会灾难造成的间接创伤筛查量表(SITMES)在土耳其的有效性和可靠性","authors":"Aysun Güzel,&nbsp;Selma İnfal Kesim","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.12616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>The present study aimed to address the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Screening Scale for Indirect Trauma Caused by Media Exposure to Social Disasters (SITMES). This study was a methodological research. The data was collected between July 17 and September 18, 2023. The sample consisted of individuals aged 18 and older residing in any province across Turkiye. The data of 530 participants were collected through online (Google Forms) and face-to-face (for test–retest purposes) methods (405 through Google Forms and 125 face-to-face participants in Burdur province). The data were collected using a demographic information form (six questions), the SITMES (24 items), the 6-item Brief Resilience Scale, and the 22-item Impact of Event Scale-Revised. All analyses were performed on the SPSS 25.0 and LISREL programmes. Cronbach's α values were calculated to be .91 for the “psychological, physical, and behavioural responses to social disasters” subscale, 0.89 for the “moral resentment due to social disasters” subscale, 0.86 for the “a sense of threat to life due to social disasters” subscale, and 0.92 for the SITMES total score. The replicated confirmatory factor analysis with the mentioned modifications yielded the following goodness-of-fit indices: <i>p </i>&lt; .05, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 4.1, RMSEA = 0.07, RMR = 0.08, SRMR = 0.06, NFI = 0.88, NNFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.91, IFI = 0.91, and ECVI = 2.13. The findings revealed that the scale consisting of 24 items within three subscales can validly and reliably utilized in the Turkish context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turkish validity and reliability of the screening scale for indirect trauma caused by media exposure to social disasters (SITMES)\",\"authors\":\"Aysun Güzel,&nbsp;Selma İnfal Kesim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-5973.12616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n <p>The present study aimed to address the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Screening Scale for Indirect Trauma Caused by Media Exposure to Social Disasters (SITMES). This study was a methodological research. The data was collected between July 17 and September 18, 2023. The sample consisted of individuals aged 18 and older residing in any province across Turkiye. The data of 530 participants were collected through online (Google Forms) and face-to-face (for test–retest purposes) methods (405 through Google Forms and 125 face-to-face participants in Burdur province). The data were collected using a demographic information form (six questions), the SITMES (24 items), the 6-item Brief Resilience Scale, and the 22-item Impact of Event Scale-Revised. All analyses were performed on the SPSS 25.0 and LISREL programmes. Cronbach's α values were calculated to be .91 for the “psychological, physical, and behavioural responses to social disasters” subscale, 0.89 for the “moral resentment due to social disasters” subscale, 0.86 for the “a sense of threat to life due to social disasters” subscale, and 0.92 for the SITMES total score. The replicated confirmatory factor analysis with the mentioned modifications yielded the following goodness-of-fit indices: <i>p </i>&lt; .05, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 4.1, RMSEA = 0.07, RMR = 0.08, SRMR = 0.06, NFI = 0.88, NNFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.91, IFI = 0.91, and ECVI = 2.13. The findings revealed that the scale consisting of 24 items within three subscales can validly and reliably utilized in the Turkish context.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.12616\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.12616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨土耳其版 "媒体接触社会灾难间接创伤筛查量表"(SITMES)的有效性和可靠性。本研究属于方法论研究。数据收集时间为 2023 年 7 月 17 日至 9 月 18 日。样本包括居住在土耳其各省的 18 岁及以上的个人。通过在线(谷歌表单)和面对面(为测试目的)方式收集了 530 名参与者的数据(405 人通过谷歌表单,125 人在布尔杜尔省面对面)。收集数据时使用了人口信息表(6 个问题)、SITMES(24 个项目)、6 个项目的简易复原力量表和 22 个项目的事件影响量表-修订版。所有分析均在 SPSS 25.0 和 LISREL 程序上进行。经计算,"对社会灾难的心理、生理和行为反应 "分量表的 Cronbach's α 值为 0.91,"对社会灾难的道德不满 "分量表的 Cronbach's α 值为 0.89,"对社会灾难的生命威胁感 "分量表的 Cronbach's α 值为 0.86,SITMES 总分的 Cronbach's α 值为 0.92。经过上述修改的重复性确认因素分析得出以下拟合优度指数:p < .05,χ2/df = 4.1,RMSEA = 0.07,RMR = 0.08,SRMR = 0.06,NFI = 0.88,NNFI = 0.90,CFI = 0.91,IFI = 0.91,ECVI = 2.13。研究结果表明,该量表由三个分量表中的 24 个项目组成,可以在土耳其环境中有效、可靠地使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Turkish validity and reliability of the screening scale for indirect trauma caused by media exposure to social disasters (SITMES)

The present study aimed to address the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Screening Scale for Indirect Trauma Caused by Media Exposure to Social Disasters (SITMES). This study was a methodological research. The data was collected between July 17 and September 18, 2023. The sample consisted of individuals aged 18 and older residing in any province across Turkiye. The data of 530 participants were collected through online (Google Forms) and face-to-face (for test–retest purposes) methods (405 through Google Forms and 125 face-to-face participants in Burdur province). The data were collected using a demographic information form (six questions), the SITMES (24 items), the 6-item Brief Resilience Scale, and the 22-item Impact of Event Scale-Revised. All analyses were performed on the SPSS 25.0 and LISREL programmes. Cronbach's α values were calculated to be .91 for the “psychological, physical, and behavioural responses to social disasters” subscale, 0.89 for the “moral resentment due to social disasters” subscale, 0.86 for the “a sense of threat to life due to social disasters” subscale, and 0.92 for the SITMES total score. The replicated confirmatory factor analysis with the mentioned modifications yielded the following goodness-of-fit indices: p < .05, χ2/df = 4.1, RMSEA = 0.07, RMR = 0.08, SRMR = 0.06, NFI = 0.88, NNFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.91, IFI = 0.91, and ECVI = 2.13. The findings revealed that the scale consisting of 24 items within three subscales can validly and reliably utilized in the Turkish context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Implicating Communication: An Analysis of the US House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure's Investigative Report of the Boeing 737 MAX Crises Crisis? What Crisis? The Contestation of Urgency in Creeping Crises Multimodal Sensemaking and Sensegiving Processes of Discursive Threat Appraisal in Environmental Crisis Communication Critical crisis management competencies: Perspectives from universities of technology leadership Reimagining crisis management with an organizational learning framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1