反对在透析通路插管区安装支架的理由

Q4 Medicine Radiology Case Reports Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.radcr.2024.08.141
{"title":"反对在透析通路插管区安装支架的理由","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.radcr.2024.08.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The indications for stent grafts (SG) placement within the dialysis vascular access include recurrent stenosis at the venous anastomosis of arteriovenous grafts, vessel rupture, pseudoaneurysm exclusion, and intra-stent stenosis. Controversy exists regarding the use of SGs within the cannulation zone due to the theoretical risks of increased infection and stent fracture. While prospective studies are lacking, several retrospective studies demonstrated the safety of SG use within the cannulation area. However, the short-term nature of these retrospective studies makes it challenging to draw any reasonable conclusions about SG's long-term safety profile. The presented case here showed that the accumulative exposure to needle injury during dialysis therapy was associated with fracturing the stent leading to life-threatening skin ulcerations that required immediate surgical intervention. Additionally, this case suggests that deploying SG within the cannulation segment should be reserved for those with poor survival and have exhausted other access options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53472,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193004332400921X/pdfft?md5=4c404efc79c21cc4356c338962973390&pid=1-s2.0-S193004332400921X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case against stenting the cannulation zone of dialysis access\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radcr.2024.08.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The indications for stent grafts (SG) placement within the dialysis vascular access include recurrent stenosis at the venous anastomosis of arteriovenous grafts, vessel rupture, pseudoaneurysm exclusion, and intra-stent stenosis. Controversy exists regarding the use of SGs within the cannulation zone due to the theoretical risks of increased infection and stent fracture. While prospective studies are lacking, several retrospective studies demonstrated the safety of SG use within the cannulation area. However, the short-term nature of these retrospective studies makes it challenging to draw any reasonable conclusions about SG's long-term safety profile. The presented case here showed that the accumulative exposure to needle injury during dialysis therapy was associated with fracturing the stent leading to life-threatening skin ulcerations that required immediate surgical intervention. Additionally, this case suggests that deploying SG within the cannulation segment should be reserved for those with poor survival and have exhausted other access options.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology Case Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193004332400921X/pdfft?md5=4c404efc79c21cc4356c338962973390&pid=1-s2.0-S193004332400921X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193004332400921X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193004332400921X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在透析血管通路内放置支架移植物(SG)的适应症包括动静脉移植物静脉吻合处的复发性狭窄、血管破裂、假性动脉瘤排除和支架内狭窄。由于理论上存在增加感染和支架断裂的风险,在插管区内使用 SG 存在争议。虽然缺乏前瞻性研究,但一些回顾性研究表明在插管区域内使用 SG 是安全的。然而,由于这些回顾性研究的短期性,很难就 SG 的长期安全性得出合理的结论。本病例显示,透析治疗过程中针头损伤的累积暴露与支架断裂有关,导致危及生命的皮肤溃疡,需要立即进行手术干预。此外,该病例还表明,在插管段内部署 SG 应仅限于存活率低且已用尽其他通路选择的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The case against stenting the cannulation zone of dialysis access

The indications for stent grafts (SG) placement within the dialysis vascular access include recurrent stenosis at the venous anastomosis of arteriovenous grafts, vessel rupture, pseudoaneurysm exclusion, and intra-stent stenosis. Controversy exists regarding the use of SGs within the cannulation zone due to the theoretical risks of increased infection and stent fracture. While prospective studies are lacking, several retrospective studies demonstrated the safety of SG use within the cannulation area. However, the short-term nature of these retrospective studies makes it challenging to draw any reasonable conclusions about SG's long-term safety profile. The presented case here showed that the accumulative exposure to needle injury during dialysis therapy was associated with fracturing the stent leading to life-threatening skin ulcerations that required immediate surgical intervention. Additionally, this case suggests that deploying SG within the cannulation segment should be reserved for those with poor survival and have exhausted other access options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology Case Reports
Radiology Case Reports Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1074
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The content of this journal is exclusively case reports that feature diagnostic imaging. Categories in which case reports can be placed include the musculoskeletal system, spine, central nervous system, head and neck, cardiovascular, chest, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, multisystem, pediatric, emergency, women''s imaging, oncologic, normal variants, medical devices, foreign bodies, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, ultrasonography, imaging artifacts, forensic, anthropological, and medical-legal. Articles must be well-documented and include a review of the appropriate literature.
期刊最新文献
Emphysematous hepatitis: A case report and review of literature Accessory gallbladder with partial encasement by esophageal adenocarcinoma: A rare case report Navigating the triple threat: Management of post-ESWL urinoma, steinstrasse, and obstructive uropathy: A challenging case report Hemiconvulsion-Hemiplegia-Epilepsy syndrome in a 3-year-old girl: A case report and literature review Pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm origin: A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1