具有强烈漩涡流的两级微反应器:三种液体进料方法的比较

IF 3.8 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1016/j.cep.2024.109991
{"title":"具有强烈漩涡流的两级微反应器:三种液体进料方法的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cep.2024.109991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A two-stage microreactor with intensely swirling flows (MRISF-2) allows to perform effectively two subsequent reactions in synthesis of nanosized particles. Micromixing quality plays crucial role in ultrafast co-precipitation reactions, and depends both on the specific energy dissipation rate and on the geometry of the reactor as well as the solutions feeding manner. Solutions in MRISF-2 could be supplied by different ways: through the upper and/or lower tangential inlet pipes and through the central (axial) inlet pipe. This paper is aimed to compare experimentally and numerically three ways of liquid solutions feeding in MRISF-2 with objective to find the conditions of the highest specific energy dissipation rate. The best method of solutions supplying was found experimentally and confirmed numerically: one solution is supplied tangentially, the other through the central inlet pipe. The average specific energy dissipation rate for this method is 1.7 and 6.0 times higher compared to supply through two upper tangential inlet pipes and upper + lower tangential inlet pipes, respectively. This advantage was confirmed by measurements of segregation index <em>X</em>s by use of iodide-iodate reaction technique. Good agreement between experimental and numerical simulation results for energy dissipation rate was found for all studied cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9929,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-stage microreactor with intensely swirling flows: Comparison of three methods of liquids feeding\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cep.2024.109991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A two-stage microreactor with intensely swirling flows (MRISF-2) allows to perform effectively two subsequent reactions in synthesis of nanosized particles. Micromixing quality plays crucial role in ultrafast co-precipitation reactions, and depends both on the specific energy dissipation rate and on the geometry of the reactor as well as the solutions feeding manner. Solutions in MRISF-2 could be supplied by different ways: through the upper and/or lower tangential inlet pipes and through the central (axial) inlet pipe. This paper is aimed to compare experimentally and numerically three ways of liquid solutions feeding in MRISF-2 with objective to find the conditions of the highest specific energy dissipation rate. The best method of solutions supplying was found experimentally and confirmed numerically: one solution is supplied tangentially, the other through the central inlet pipe. The average specific energy dissipation rate for this method is 1.7 and 6.0 times higher compared to supply through two upper tangential inlet pipes and upper + lower tangential inlet pipes, respectively. This advantage was confirmed by measurements of segregation index <em>X</em>s by use of iodide-iodate reaction technique. Good agreement between experimental and numerical simulation results for energy dissipation rate was found for all studied cases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255270124003295\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255270124003295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

带有强烈漩涡流的两级微反应器(MRISF-2)可以在合成纳米颗粒时有效地进行两个后续反应。微混合质量在超快共沉淀反应中起着至关重要的作用,它既取决于特定的能量耗散率,也取决于反应器的几何形状和溶液供给方式。MRISF-2 中的溶液可以通过不同的方式供给:通过上部和/或下部切向进气管以及通过中央(轴向)进气管。本文旨在对 MRISF-2 中的三种溶液供给方式进行实验和数值比较,目的是找到比能量耗散率最高的条件。通过实验和数值计算,找到了最佳的溶液供给方式:一种溶液是切向供给,另一种是通过中央入口管道供给。与通过两个上切线进气管和上+下切线进气管供应溶液相比,这种方法的平均比能量耗散率分别高出 1.7 倍和 6.0 倍。利用碘-碘酸反应技术测量偏析指数 Xs 证实了这一优势。在所有研究案例中,能量耗散率的实验结果和数值模拟结果都非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two-stage microreactor with intensely swirling flows: Comparison of three methods of liquids feeding

A two-stage microreactor with intensely swirling flows (MRISF-2) allows to perform effectively two subsequent reactions in synthesis of nanosized particles. Micromixing quality plays crucial role in ultrafast co-precipitation reactions, and depends both on the specific energy dissipation rate and on the geometry of the reactor as well as the solutions feeding manner. Solutions in MRISF-2 could be supplied by different ways: through the upper and/or lower tangential inlet pipes and through the central (axial) inlet pipe. This paper is aimed to compare experimentally and numerically three ways of liquid solutions feeding in MRISF-2 with objective to find the conditions of the highest specific energy dissipation rate. The best method of solutions supplying was found experimentally and confirmed numerically: one solution is supplied tangentially, the other through the central inlet pipe. The average specific energy dissipation rate for this method is 1.7 and 6.0 times higher compared to supply through two upper tangential inlet pipes and upper + lower tangential inlet pipes, respectively. This advantage was confirmed by measurements of segregation index Xs by use of iodide-iodate reaction technique. Good agreement between experimental and numerical simulation results for energy dissipation rate was found for all studied cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.30%
发文量
408
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification is intended for practicing researchers in industry and academia, working in the field of Process Engineering and related to the subject of Process Intensification.Articles published in the Journal demonstrate how novel discoveries, developments and theories in the field of Process Engineering and in particular Process Intensification may be used for analysis and design of innovative equipment and processing methods with substantially improved sustainability, efficiency and environmental performance.
期刊最新文献
The potential of integrating solar-powered membrane distillation with a humidification–dehumidification system to recover potable water from textile wastewater Optimization of antimicrobial properties of essential oils under rotating magnetic field Parametric design of curved hydrocyclone using data points and its separation enhancement mechanism Supercritical carbon dioxide as solvent for manufacturing of ibuprofen loaded gelatine sponges with enhanced performance Investigation of gas-liquid mass transfer in slurry systems driven by the coaxial mixer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1