人工智能与司法真理的产生

IF 2.7 2区社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Theory Culture & Society Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1177/02632764241268174

Joan Rovira Martorell, Ana Gálvez, Francisco Tirado

{"title":"人工智能与司法真理的产生","authors":"Joan Rovira Martorell, Ana Gálvez, Francisco Tirado","doi":"10.1177/02632764241268174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to present artificial intelligence (AI) as an organ with a role in the production of judicial truth, expanding its objects, changing its procedures and reshaping the distribution of agencies within the judicial organism. To this end, it builds on Michel Foucault’s work on the procedures of truth production and the three subject forms involved: operator, spectator and object. This is then complemented by the general organological perspective proposed by Bernard Stiegler. On the basis of both, we will demonstrate two realities: first, that AI is shifting truth production from the individual to the profile, and second, that the types of associations that AI is forming have the potential to curtail human agency in the production of judicial truth.","PeriodicalId":48276,"journal":{"name":"Theory Culture & Society","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and the Production of Judicial Truth\",\"authors\":\"Joan Rovira Martorell, Ana Gálvez, Francisco Tirado\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02632764241268174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to present artificial intelligence (AI) as an organ with a role in the production of judicial truth, expanding its objects, changing its procedures and reshaping the distribution of agencies within the judicial organism. To this end, it builds on Michel Foucault’s work on the procedures of truth production and the three subject forms involved: operator, spectator and object. This is then complemented by the general organological perspective proposed by Bernard Stiegler. On the basis of both, we will demonstrate two realities: first, that AI is shifting truth production from the individual to the profile, and second, that the types of associations that AI is forming have the potential to curtail human agency in the production of judicial truth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory Culture & Society\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241268174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241268174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是将人工智能（AI）作为一个在司法真相生产中发挥作用的机构，扩大其对象，改变其程序，并重塑司法机构内部的机构分布。为此，本研究以米歇尔-福柯（Michel Foucault）关于真相生产程序和三种主体形式（操作者、旁观者和客体）的研究为基础。随后，伯纳德-斯蒂格勒（Bernard Stiegler）提出的一般有机体视角对其进行了补充。在这两者的基础上，我们将证明两个现实：第一，人工智能正在将真相的生产从个人转移到轮廓；第二，人工智能正在形成的关联类型有可能在司法真相的生产过程中削弱人类的能动性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Artificial Intelligence and the Production of Judicial Truth

The aim of this paper is to present artificial intelligence (AI) as an organ with a role in the production of judicial truth, expanding its objects, changing its procedures and reshaping the distribution of agencies within the judicial organism. To this end, it builds on Michel Foucault’s work on the procedures of truth production and the three subject forms involved: operator, spectator and object. This is then complemented by the general organological perspective proposed by Bernard Stiegler. On the basis of both, we will demonstrate two realities: first, that AI is shifting truth production from the individual to the profile, and second, that the types of associations that AI is forming have the potential to curtail human agency in the production of judicial truth.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Theory Culture & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Theory, Culture & Society is a highly ranked, high impact factor, rigorously peer reviewed journal that publishes original research and review articles in the social and cultural sciences. Launched in 1982 to cater for the resurgence of interest in culture within contemporary social science, Theory, Culture & Society provides a forum for articles which theorize the relationship between culture and society. Theory, Culture & Society is at the cutting edge of recent developments in social and cultural theory. The journal has helped to break down some of the disciplinary barriers between the humanities and the social sciences by opening up a wide range of new questions in cultural theory.

期刊最新文献

Latour and the Question of Politics: A Constitutional Reading The Land of the Moderns: The Sense of Latour’s Pragmatism With and after the Inquiry: How Do We Pragmatically Move from the Moderns to the Contemporaries? Bruno Latour and Religion: A Strange Parishioner Artificial Intelligence and the Production of Judicial Truth