蚕豆、蓝羽扇豆和鹰嘴豆获取磷与土壤磷状况的关系

IF 5 3区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Use and Management Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1111/sum.13110
Lenir Fátima Gotz, Paulo Sergio Pavinato, Leo Murtagh Condron
{"title":"蚕豆、蓝羽扇豆和鹰嘴豆获取磷与土壤磷状况的关系","authors":"Lenir Fátima Gotz, Paulo Sergio Pavinato, Leo Murtagh Condron","doi":"10.1111/sum.13110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of soil phosphorus (P) mobilization and uptake by plants depends on a complex combination of factors, including plant P acquisition strategies and soil P availability. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the capabilities of three legume species (blue lupin (<jats:italic>Lupinus angustifolius</jats:italic> L.), faba bean (<jats:italic>Vicia faba</jats:italic> L.), and chickpea (<jats:italic>Cicer arietinum</jats:italic> L.)), which may be used as green manures in temperate crop systems to acquire P from a soil with different levels of plant‐available P. Three cycles of each legume were grown in a glasshouse over a 6 month period in the same soil type with high (Olsen P: 47 mg kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and low (Olsen P: 9 mg kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) levels of plant‐available P. Measurements included above—and below—ground plant biomass and P uptake, in addition to determination of acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase activities, microbial P, and P fractions in soil at the end of the experiment. In both soils, plant biomass, P uptake, and microbial P were all higher under faba bean compared to blue lupin and chickpea (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .05). In the low‐P soil, faba bean increased alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .05). Significant depletion of inorganic P in the soluble (46%–69%), labile (29%–42%), and moderately labile (15%–16%) pools and increase of organic P in the labile (13%–18%) and total (7%–13%) pools occurred under faba bean compared with blue lupin, while changes under chickpea were between those determined for faba bean and blue lupin (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .05). The findings of this study indicated that inclusion of faba bean green manure may have the potential to improve overall P use efficiency by enhancing mobilization of labile soil inorganic P, although further research is required to investigate mobilization of more stable forms of soil legacy P and quantify the potential of faba bean as a green manure crop under field conditions.","PeriodicalId":21759,"journal":{"name":"Soil Use and Management","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phosphorus acquisition by faba bean, blue lupin, and chickpea in relation to soil phosphorus status\",\"authors\":\"Lenir Fátima Gotz, Paulo Sergio Pavinato, Leo Murtagh Condron\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sum.13110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The efficiency of soil phosphorus (P) mobilization and uptake by plants depends on a complex combination of factors, including plant P acquisition strategies and soil P availability. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the capabilities of three legume species (blue lupin (<jats:italic>Lupinus angustifolius</jats:italic> L.), faba bean (<jats:italic>Vicia faba</jats:italic> L.), and chickpea (<jats:italic>Cicer arietinum</jats:italic> L.)), which may be used as green manures in temperate crop systems to acquire P from a soil with different levels of plant‐available P. Three cycles of each legume were grown in a glasshouse over a 6 month period in the same soil type with high (Olsen P: 47 mg kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) and low (Olsen P: 9 mg kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) levels of plant‐available P. Measurements included above—and below—ground plant biomass and P uptake, in addition to determination of acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase activities, microbial P, and P fractions in soil at the end of the experiment. In both soils, plant biomass, P uptake, and microbial P were all higher under faba bean compared to blue lupin and chickpea (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .05). In the low‐P soil, faba bean increased alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .05). Significant depletion of inorganic P in the soluble (46%–69%), labile (29%–42%), and moderately labile (15%–16%) pools and increase of organic P in the labile (13%–18%) and total (7%–13%) pools occurred under faba bean compared with blue lupin, while changes under chickpea were between those determined for faba bean and blue lupin (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .05). The findings of this study indicated that inclusion of faba bean green manure may have the potential to improve overall P use efficiency by enhancing mobilization of labile soil inorganic P, although further research is required to investigate mobilization of more stable forms of soil legacy P and quantify the potential of faba bean as a green manure crop under field conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13110\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Use and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤磷(P)的动员效率和植物对磷的吸收取决于复杂的综合因素,包括植物获取磷的策略和土壤磷的可用性。本研究旨在评估和比较三种豆科植物(蓝羽扇豆(Lupinus angustifolius L.)、蚕豆(Vicia faba L.)和鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.))从具有不同植物可利用态磷水平的土壤中获取态磷的能力。在为期 6 个月的时间里,每种豆科植物都在玻璃温室中生长了三个周期,分别生长在植物可利用钾水平较高(奥尔森钾:47 毫克/千克-1)和较低(奥尔森钾:9 毫克/千克-1)的同一类型土壤中。除了测定酸性和碱性磷酸单酯酶活性、微生物钾和实验结束时土壤中的钾组分外,还测量了地上和地下植物的生物量和钾吸收量。在两种土壤中,与蓝羽扇豆和鹰嘴豆相比,蚕豆的植物生物量、钾吸收量和微生物钾含量都更高(p < .05)。在低磷土壤中,蚕豆提高了碱性磷单酯酶的活性(p < .05)。与蓝羽扇豆相比,蚕豆的可溶性(46%-69%)、易溶性(29%-42%)和中度易溶性(15%-16%)池中的无机钾显著减少,易溶性(13%-18%)和总钾(7%-13%)池中的有机钾显著增加,而鹰嘴豆的变化介于蚕豆和蓝羽扇豆的变化之间(p <.05)。这项研究的结果表明,施用蚕豆绿肥有可能通过提高对土壤中易变无机钾的吸收来提高钾的总体利用效率,但还需要进一步研究土壤中更稳定形式的遗留钾的吸收情况,并量化蚕豆作为绿肥作物在田间条件下的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phosphorus acquisition by faba bean, blue lupin, and chickpea in relation to soil phosphorus status
The efficiency of soil phosphorus (P) mobilization and uptake by plants depends on a complex combination of factors, including plant P acquisition strategies and soil P availability. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the capabilities of three legume species (blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)), which may be used as green manures in temperate crop systems to acquire P from a soil with different levels of plant‐available P. Three cycles of each legume were grown in a glasshouse over a 6 month period in the same soil type with high (Olsen P: 47 mg kg−1) and low (Olsen P: 9 mg kg−1) levels of plant‐available P. Measurements included above—and below—ground plant biomass and P uptake, in addition to determination of acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase activities, microbial P, and P fractions in soil at the end of the experiment. In both soils, plant biomass, P uptake, and microbial P were all higher under faba bean compared to blue lupin and chickpea (p < .05). In the low‐P soil, faba bean increased alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity (p < .05). Significant depletion of inorganic P in the soluble (46%–69%), labile (29%–42%), and moderately labile (15%–16%) pools and increase of organic P in the labile (13%–18%) and total (7%–13%) pools occurred under faba bean compared with blue lupin, while changes under chickpea were between those determined for faba bean and blue lupin (p < .05). The findings of this study indicated that inclusion of faba bean green manure may have the potential to improve overall P use efficiency by enhancing mobilization of labile soil inorganic P, although further research is required to investigate mobilization of more stable forms of soil legacy P and quantify the potential of faba bean as a green manure crop under field conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Use and Management
Soil Use and Management 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
13.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Soil Use and Management publishes in soil science, earth and environmental science, agricultural science, and engineering fields. The submitted papers should consider the underlying mechanisms governing the natural and anthropogenic processes which affect soil systems, and should inform policy makers and/or practitioners on the sustainable use and management of soil resources. Interdisciplinary studies, e.g. linking soil with climate change, biodiversity, global health, and the UN’s sustainable development goals, with strong novelty, wide implications, and unexpected outcomes are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Phosphorus acquisition by faba bean, blue lupin, and chickpea in relation to soil phosphorus status Approaching soil health from a practitioner perspective – Placing practices before indicators for Australian cotton and other producers Soil carbon in the boreal region under climate and land use change Remediation of Pb, Cd, and Cu contaminated soil with Mg‐Fe‐Al layered double hydroxides (LDHs) synthesized from waste red mud Effects of unbalanced fertilizer use on system productivity and profitability under rice‐based cropping systems: Evidence from Eastern Gangetic Plain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1