Kristian Kjærgaard,Sibel Yilmaz,Bart Kaptein,Søren Overgaard,Ming Ding
{"title":"使用 EOS 成像系统测量全髋关节置换术衬垫磨损情况:实验和临床结果。","authors":"Kristian Kjærgaard,Sibel Yilmaz,Bart Kaptein,Søren Overgaard,Ming Ding","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.41912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\r\nThe low-dose EOS Imaging System is an emerging tool for 3-dimensional measurements in orthopedics. The clinical feasibility for measuring total hip arthroplasty (THA) liner wear has not yet been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using EOS to measure THA liner wear by examining the experimental accuracy using a THA phantom and clinical precision of patients with THA, considering a clinically relevant precision at the 95% repeatability limit to be 0.2 mm.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAn experimental THA phantom with movable stem and a fixed cup with a plastic liner was constructed to simulate progressive 3D liner wear. Series of 11 pairs of radiographs with 50 μm femoral movement in between were obtained for each 3D axis in EOS. 30 patients with a THA were scanned twice using EOS to assess precision. Model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used for wear measurement.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe mean difference (true minus simulated wear) with standard deviation (SD) and 95% limits of agreement for experimental THA wear were 0.005 (0.037) and [-0.069 to 0.079] mm for the vertical (y) axis. The mean (SD) and 95% repeatability limit for precision for clinical measurement were -0.029 (0.105) and 0.218 mm.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nExperimental THA liner wear using EOS was within clinically relevant tolerances and without bias. The clinical precision was just outside our defined clinically relevant precision. Compared with conventional RSA, EOS is less accurate and precise but may still be of value for certain clinical applications, provided larger sample size or longer follow-up are available.","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"39 1","pages":"530-535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring total hip arthroplasty liner wear using the EOS Imaging System: experimental and clinical results.\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Kjærgaard,Sibel Yilmaz,Bart Kaptein,Søren Overgaard,Ming Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2024.41912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\\r\\nThe low-dose EOS Imaging System is an emerging tool for 3-dimensional measurements in orthopedics. The clinical feasibility for measuring total hip arthroplasty (THA) liner wear has not yet been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using EOS to measure THA liner wear by examining the experimental accuracy using a THA phantom and clinical precision of patients with THA, considering a clinically relevant precision at the 95% repeatability limit to be 0.2 mm.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nAn experimental THA phantom with movable stem and a fixed cup with a plastic liner was constructed to simulate progressive 3D liner wear. Series of 11 pairs of radiographs with 50 μm femoral movement in between were obtained for each 3D axis in EOS. 30 patients with a THA were scanned twice using EOS to assess precision. Model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used for wear measurement.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe mean difference (true minus simulated wear) with standard deviation (SD) and 95% limits of agreement for experimental THA wear were 0.005 (0.037) and [-0.069 to 0.079] mm for the vertical (y) axis. The mean (SD) and 95% repeatability limit for precision for clinical measurement were -0.029 (0.105) and 0.218 mm.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nExperimental THA liner wear using EOS was within clinically relevant tolerances and without bias. The clinical precision was just outside our defined clinically relevant precision. Compared with conventional RSA, EOS is less accurate and precise but may still be of value for certain clinical applications, provided larger sample size or longer follow-up are available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"530-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41912\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的低剂量 EOS 成像系统是骨科三维测量的新兴工具。测量全髋关节置换术(THA)衬垫磨损的临床可行性尚未得到研究。我们的目的是评估使用 EOS 测量全髋关节置换术衬垫磨损的可行性,方法是使用全髋关节置换术模型检查实验准确性和全髋关节置换术患者的临床准确性,认为 95% 重复性限值下的临床相关准确性为 0.2 mm。在 EOS 中的每个 3D 轴上获取 11 对射线照片系列,中间股骨移动 50 μm。使用 EOS 对 30 名 THA 患者进行了两次扫描,以评估精确度。结果实验性 THA 磨损的平均差(真实磨损减去模拟磨损)、标准偏差(SD)和 95% 一致性限值分别为 0.005 (0.037) 和 [-0.069 至 0.079] mm(垂直(y)轴)。临床测量精度的平均值(SD)和 95% 可重复性限值分别为 -0.029 (0.105) 和 0.218 mm。临床精度略高于我们定义的临床相关精度。与传统的RSA相比,EOS的准确性和精确度较低,但如果样本量较大或随访时间较长,EOS仍有一定的临床应用价值。
Measuring total hip arthroplasty liner wear using the EOS Imaging System: experimental and clinical results.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The low-dose EOS Imaging System is an emerging tool for 3-dimensional measurements in orthopedics. The clinical feasibility for measuring total hip arthroplasty (THA) liner wear has not yet been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using EOS to measure THA liner wear by examining the experimental accuracy using a THA phantom and clinical precision of patients with THA, considering a clinically relevant precision at the 95% repeatability limit to be 0.2 mm.
METHODS
An experimental THA phantom with movable stem and a fixed cup with a plastic liner was constructed to simulate progressive 3D liner wear. Series of 11 pairs of radiographs with 50 μm femoral movement in between were obtained for each 3D axis in EOS. 30 patients with a THA were scanned twice using EOS to assess precision. Model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used for wear measurement.
RESULTS
The mean difference (true minus simulated wear) with standard deviation (SD) and 95% limits of agreement for experimental THA wear were 0.005 (0.037) and [-0.069 to 0.079] mm for the vertical (y) axis. The mean (SD) and 95% repeatability limit for precision for clinical measurement were -0.029 (0.105) and 0.218 mm.
CONCLUSION
Experimental THA liner wear using EOS was within clinically relevant tolerances and without bias. The clinical precision was just outside our defined clinically relevant precision. Compared with conventional RSA, EOS is less accurate and precise but may still be of value for certain clinical applications, provided larger sample size or longer follow-up are available.
期刊介绍:
Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.