腹股沟疝气患者的虚弱程度分类

Ashley Huggins, Cameron Casson, Tim Holden, Arnab Majumder, Jeffrey Blatnik, Sara E. Holden
{"title":"腹股沟疝气患者的虚弱程度分类","authors":"Ashley Huggins, Cameron Casson, Tim Holden, Arnab Majumder, Jeffrey Blatnik, Sara E. Holden","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11250-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Frailty is increasingly recognized as a preoperative predictor of adverse outcomes following various surgical procedures. Our study aims to compare validated frailty measures in the ventral hernia population, as this is a common elective procedure with a paucity of data regarding frailty prevalence.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Patients aged 18 years or older with planned ventral hernia repairs were prospectively enrolled in our single-institution study from January 2023 through June 2023. After obtaining informed consent, patients completed the Fried Frailty Index (FFI), the FRAIL Scale, and the Strength, Assistance walking, Rising from a chair, Climbing stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaires, as well as the standard completion of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures at their preoperative clinic appointment. Chart review was performed for baseline demographics and comorbidities. The Modified Frailty Index (mFI-11) and the Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI) were calculated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 63 patients were enrolled in our study. On average, the population was 60 years old, with a BMI of 32.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, a CCI of 3, and on 10.5 medications preoperatively. Overall, 12 patients (19%) screened positive for frailty by the mFI-11, 17 patients (27%) by the FFI, 15 patients (23.8%) by the FRAIL Scale, and 15 patients (23.8%) screened positive for sarcopenia by SARC-F. The FFI and the FRAIL Scale were strongly correlated with the other measures by Spearman’s rank-order correlation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). On multivariate regression analysis, a longer Timed Up and Go test was associated with screening positive for frailty or sarcopenia (OR 1.896, <i>p</i> = 0.016).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we find that frailty is more prevalent than previously reported in the literature by any measure used. Both the FRAIL Scale and FFI strongly correlate with the other tools investigated. Surgeons should consider using these assessments preoperatively to estimate frailty and guide operative planning as well as shared decision-making.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Huggins, Cameron Casson, Tim Holden, Arnab Majumder, Jeffrey Blatnik, Sara E. Holden\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-024-11250-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>Frailty is increasingly recognized as a preoperative predictor of adverse outcomes following various surgical procedures. Our study aims to compare validated frailty measures in the ventral hernia population, as this is a common elective procedure with a paucity of data regarding frailty prevalence.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Patients aged 18 years or older with planned ventral hernia repairs were prospectively enrolled in our single-institution study from January 2023 through June 2023. After obtaining informed consent, patients completed the Fried Frailty Index (FFI), the FRAIL Scale, and the Strength, Assistance walking, Rising from a chair, Climbing stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaires, as well as the standard completion of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures at their preoperative clinic appointment. Chart review was performed for baseline demographics and comorbidities. The Modified Frailty Index (mFI-11) and the Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI) were calculated.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>A total of 63 patients were enrolled in our study. On average, the population was 60 years old, with a BMI of 32.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, a CCI of 3, and on 10.5 medications preoperatively. Overall, 12 patients (19%) screened positive for frailty by the mFI-11, 17 patients (27%) by the FFI, 15 patients (23.8%) by the FRAIL Scale, and 15 patients (23.8%) screened positive for sarcopenia by SARC-F. The FFI and the FRAIL Scale were strongly correlated with the other measures by Spearman’s rank-order correlation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). On multivariate regression analysis, a longer Timed Up and Go test was associated with screening positive for frailty or sarcopenia (OR 1.896, <i>p</i> = 0.016).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we find that frailty is more prevalent than previously reported in the literature by any measure used. Both the FRAIL Scale and FFI strongly correlate with the other tools investigated. Surgeons should consider using these assessments preoperatively to estimate frailty and guide operative planning as well as shared decision-making.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":501625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11250-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11250-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言越来越多的人认识到,体弱是各种外科手术术后不良预后的术前预测因素。我们的研究旨在比较腹股沟疝人群中经过验证的虚弱测量指标,因为这是一种常见的择期手术,但有关虚弱发生率的数据却很少。在获得知情同意后,患者在术前门诊预约时填写弗里德虚弱指数(FFI)、FRAIL量表和力量、协助行走、从椅子上站起、爬楼梯和跌倒(SARC-F)问卷,并标准填写患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)测量。对基线人口统计学和合并症进行了病历审查。我们计算了改良虚弱指数(mFI-11)和查尔斯顿合并症指数(CCI)。平均年龄为 60 岁,体重指数为 32.4 kg/m2,CCI 为 3,术前服用 10.5 种药物。总体而言,12 名患者(19%)通过 mFI-11 筛选出虚弱,17 名患者(27%)通过 FFI 筛选出虚弱,15 名患者(23.8%)通过 FRAIL 量表筛查出虚弱,15 名患者(23.8%)通过 SARC-F 筛选出肌少症。根据斯皮尔曼秩相关性(p <0.05),FFI 和 FRAIL 量表与其他测量指标密切相关。在多变量回归分析中,定时起立和走动测试时间越长,则虚弱或肌肉疏松症筛查阳性率越高(OR 1.896,p = 0.016)。FRAIL 量表和 FFI 均与其他调查工具密切相关。外科医生应考虑在术前使用这些评估来估计虚弱程度,并为手术计划和共同决策提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population

Introduction

Frailty is increasingly recognized as a preoperative predictor of adverse outcomes following various surgical procedures. Our study aims to compare validated frailty measures in the ventral hernia population, as this is a common elective procedure with a paucity of data regarding frailty prevalence.

Methods

Patients aged 18 years or older with planned ventral hernia repairs were prospectively enrolled in our single-institution study from January 2023 through June 2023. After obtaining informed consent, patients completed the Fried Frailty Index (FFI), the FRAIL Scale, and the Strength, Assistance walking, Rising from a chair, Climbing stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaires, as well as the standard completion of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures at their preoperative clinic appointment. Chart review was performed for baseline demographics and comorbidities. The Modified Frailty Index (mFI-11) and the Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI) were calculated.

Results

A total of 63 patients were enrolled in our study. On average, the population was 60 years old, with a BMI of 32.4 kg/m2, a CCI of 3, and on 10.5 medications preoperatively. Overall, 12 patients (19%) screened positive for frailty by the mFI-11, 17 patients (27%) by the FFI, 15 patients (23.8%) by the FRAIL Scale, and 15 patients (23.8%) screened positive for sarcopenia by SARC-F. The FFI and the FRAIL Scale were strongly correlated with the other measures by Spearman’s rank-order correlation (p < 0.05). On multivariate regression analysis, a longer Timed Up and Go test was associated with screening positive for frailty or sarcopenia (OR 1.896, p = 0.016).

Conclusion

In this study, we find that frailty is more prevalent than previously reported in the literature by any measure used. Both the FRAIL Scale and FFI strongly correlate with the other tools investigated. Surgeons should consider using these assessments preoperatively to estimate frailty and guide operative planning as well as shared decision-making.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-term gut microbiota’s shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population Retrospective study on endoscopic treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1