含洋甘菊和不含洋甘菊的脂质体凝胶在预防乳腺癌患者放射性皮炎方面的比较:随机对照试验

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s00066-024-02293-9
Amanda Gomes de Meneses, Elaine Barros Ferreira, Larissa Aparecida Corrêa Vieira, Priscila de Souza Maggi Bontempo, Eliete Neves Silva Guerra, Marcia Aparecida Ciol, Paula Elaine Diniz dos Reis
{"title":"含洋甘菊和不含洋甘菊的脂质体凝胶在预防乳腺癌患者放射性皮炎方面的比较:随机对照试验","authors":"Amanda Gomes de Meneses, Elaine Barros Ferreira, Larissa Aparecida Corrêa Vieira, Priscila de Souza Maggi Bontempo, Eliete Neves Silva Guerra, Marcia Aparecida Ciol, Paula Elaine Diniz dos Reis","doi":"10.1007/s00066-024-02293-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To compare a liposomal gel with and without chamomile extract for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial. A total of 100 participants undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were recruited. The primary outcome was the occurrence of dry desquamation. Cumulative dose of ionizing radiation at the first occurrence of dry desquamation, occurrence of erythema, moist desquamation, global radiation dermatitis, and any signs and symptoms self-reported by participants were secondary outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Dry desquamation occurred in 6.0% of the participants using chamomile liposomal gel and 12.2% of those using liposomal gel (<i>p</i> = 0.32). The mean cumulative dose of ionizing radiation for the first occurrence of dry desquamation was 45.1 Gy in the chamomile liposomal gel group and 43.7 Gy in the liposomal gel group. There were no differences between the two gels in the occurrence of erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and radiation dermatitis compared to liposomal gel. There was a lower proportion of reported symptoms in the chamomile liposomal gel group compared to liposomal gel group in the first 3 weeks of radiation, especially for itching (<i>p</i> = 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>No statistically significant differences between the two gels were found in radiation dermatitis occurrence and dose at first occurrence. Comparing to the literature, it seems that both interventions may be effective, which might explain the lack of statistical difference between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of liposomal gel with and without chamomile to prevent radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Gomes de Meneses, Elaine Barros Ferreira, Larissa Aparecida Corrêa Vieira, Priscila de Souza Maggi Bontempo, Eliete Neves Silva Guerra, Marcia Aparecida Ciol, Paula Elaine Diniz dos Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00066-024-02293-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>To compare a liposomal gel with and without chamomile extract for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial. A total of 100 participants undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were recruited. The primary outcome was the occurrence of dry desquamation. Cumulative dose of ionizing radiation at the first occurrence of dry desquamation, occurrence of erythema, moist desquamation, global radiation dermatitis, and any signs and symptoms self-reported by participants were secondary outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Dry desquamation occurred in 6.0% of the participants using chamomile liposomal gel and 12.2% of those using liposomal gel (<i>p</i> = 0.32). The mean cumulative dose of ionizing radiation for the first occurrence of dry desquamation was 45.1 Gy in the chamomile liposomal gel group and 43.7 Gy in the liposomal gel group. There were no differences between the two gels in the occurrence of erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and radiation dermatitis compared to liposomal gel. There was a lower proportion of reported symptoms in the chamomile liposomal gel group compared to liposomal gel group in the first 3 weeks of radiation, especially for itching (<i>p</i> = 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>No statistically significant differences between the two gels were found in radiation dermatitis occurrence and dose at first occurrence. Comparing to the literature, it seems that both interventions may be effective, which might explain the lack of statistical difference between the groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02293-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02293-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较含洋甘菊提取物和不含洋甘菊提取物的脂质体凝胶对接受放射治疗的乳腺癌患者放射性皮炎的预防作用。共招募了 100 名接受放射治疗的乳腺癌患者。主要结果是出现干性脱屑。首次出现干性脱屑时电离辐射的累积剂量、红斑的出现、湿性脱屑、全身放射性皮炎以及参与者自我报告的任何体征和症状是次要结果。结果使用洋甘菊脂质体凝胶的参与者中有6.0%出现干性脱屑,使用脂质体凝胶的参与者中有12.2%出现干性脱屑(p = 0.32)。洋甘菊脂质体凝胶组和脂质体凝胶组首次出现干性脱屑的平均电离辐射累积剂量分别为 45.1 Gy 和 43.7 Gy。与脂质体凝胶相比,两种凝胶在出现红斑、干性脱屑、湿性脱屑和放射性皮炎方面没有差异。结论 两种凝胶在辐射性皮炎的发生率和首次发生的剂量方面没有发现显著的统计学差异。与文献相比,两种干预措施似乎都很有效,这可能是两组之间没有统计学差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of liposomal gel with and without chamomile to prevent radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To compare a liposomal gel with and without chamomile extract for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Methods

This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial. A total of 100 participants undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were recruited. The primary outcome was the occurrence of dry desquamation. Cumulative dose of ionizing radiation at the first occurrence of dry desquamation, occurrence of erythema, moist desquamation, global radiation dermatitis, and any signs and symptoms self-reported by participants were secondary outcomes.

Results

Dry desquamation occurred in 6.0% of the participants using chamomile liposomal gel and 12.2% of those using liposomal gel (p = 0.32). The mean cumulative dose of ionizing radiation for the first occurrence of dry desquamation was 45.1 Gy in the chamomile liposomal gel group and 43.7 Gy in the liposomal gel group. There were no differences between the two gels in the occurrence of erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and radiation dermatitis compared to liposomal gel. There was a lower proportion of reported symptoms in the chamomile liposomal gel group compared to liposomal gel group in the first 3 weeks of radiation, especially for itching (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

No statistically significant differences between the two gels were found in radiation dermatitis occurrence and dose at first occurrence. Comparing to the literature, it seems that both interventions may be effective, which might explain the lack of statistical difference between the groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
期刊最新文献
[Longterm outcome of definitive radiotherapy using IMRT vs. 3D-CRT in locally advanced, inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)]. Non-coding RNAs modulation in breast cancer radioresponse: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Interstitial HDR brachytherapy for anal cancer-results and quality of life. Efficacy of palliative hemostatic radiotherapy for tumor bleeding and pain relief in locally advanced pelvic gynecological malignancies. Friedrich Dessauer-reflections on his political and personal sacrifices : In reply to: Benzaquen et al. "Friedrich Dessauer (1881-1963): The forgotten medical physicist, politician, and philosopher".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1