消费者对养殖肉类的认知和接受度的决定因素:系统回顾与未来研究议程

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Consumer Studies Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1111/ijcs.13088
Firdaus Abd Hanan, Shahrim Ab Karim, Yuhanis Ab Aziz, Farah Adibah Che Ishak, Norzuwana Sumarjan
{"title":"消费者对养殖肉类的认知和接受度的决定因素:系统回顾与未来研究议程","authors":"Firdaus Abd Hanan,&nbsp;Shahrim Ab Karim,&nbsp;Yuhanis Ab Aziz,&nbsp;Farah Adibah Che Ishak,&nbsp;Norzuwana Sumarjan","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.13088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The reliance on animal husbandry for protein has caused environmental, social and ethical challenges worldwide, yet the demand for animal-based food continues to rise. Despite the increasing attention from scholars and professionals on the potential of cultured meat (CM) as a viable alternative protein source, the ensuing scholarly work still lacks coherence and is incomplete and fragmented. Its success also depends heavily on customer acceptance. This study therefore examined peer-reviewed literature on consumers' perceptions and acceptance of CM. A comprehensive search was conducted on ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and Scopus databases between 2017 and 2022, yielding 54 papers that met the selection criteria. The qualitative synthesis conducted revealed seven themes that had the highest influence on consumers' acceptance of CM. The themes identified were (i) attitudes and traits, (ii) situational impact, (iii) information and nomenclature, (iv) CM properties, (v) risk–benefit perception, (vi) familiarity and awareness and (vii) competition with other alternative proteins. This review also identified demographic predictors of consumers who are most likely to accept CM. The review found that although consumers are curious and willing to try CM, failure to address personal attitudes and traits may lead to failure in adoption. It was also found that strategies that include emotional responses are more effective in the long run.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"48 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer's Cultured Meat Perception and Acceptance Determinants: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda\",\"authors\":\"Firdaus Abd Hanan,&nbsp;Shahrim Ab Karim,&nbsp;Yuhanis Ab Aziz,&nbsp;Farah Adibah Che Ishak,&nbsp;Norzuwana Sumarjan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijcs.13088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The reliance on animal husbandry for protein has caused environmental, social and ethical challenges worldwide, yet the demand for animal-based food continues to rise. Despite the increasing attention from scholars and professionals on the potential of cultured meat (CM) as a viable alternative protein source, the ensuing scholarly work still lacks coherence and is incomplete and fragmented. Its success also depends heavily on customer acceptance. This study therefore examined peer-reviewed literature on consumers' perceptions and acceptance of CM. A comprehensive search was conducted on ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and Scopus databases between 2017 and 2022, yielding 54 papers that met the selection criteria. The qualitative synthesis conducted revealed seven themes that had the highest influence on consumers' acceptance of CM. The themes identified were (i) attitudes and traits, (ii) situational impact, (iii) information and nomenclature, (iv) CM properties, (v) risk–benefit perception, (vi) familiarity and awareness and (vii) competition with other alternative proteins. This review also identified demographic predictors of consumers who are most likely to accept CM. The review found that although consumers are curious and willing to try CM, failure to address personal attitudes and traits may lead to failure in adoption. It was also found that strategies that include emotional responses are more effective in the long run.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"volume\":\"48 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.13088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.13088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

依赖畜牧业获取蛋白质已在全球范围内造成了环境、社会和伦理方面的挑战,但人们对动物性食品的需求却持续上升。尽管学者和专业人士越来越关注养殖肉类(CM)作为一种可行的替代蛋白质来源的潜力,但随之而来的学术研究仍然缺乏连贯性,不完整且零散。其成功与否还在很大程度上取决于客户的接受程度。因此,本研究审查了有关消费者对中药的看法和接受程度的同行评议文献。研究人员在 ScienceDirect、Google Scholar 和 Scopus 数据库中对 2017 年至 2022 年期间的文献进行了全面检索,共获得 54 篇符合筛选标准的论文。定性综述显示,有七个主题对消费者接受中药的影响最大。所确定的主题分别是:(i)态度和特质;(ii)情景影响;(iii)信息和术语;(iv)中药特性;(v)风险收益认知;(vi)熟悉度和认知度;(vii)与其他替代蛋白质的竞争。该综述还确定了最有可能接受中药的消费者的人口统计学预测因素。综述发现,尽管消费者对中药充满好奇并愿意尝试,但如果不能解决个人态度和特质问题,可能会导致中药应用失败。研究还发现,从长远来看,包含情感反应的策略更为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumer's Cultured Meat Perception and Acceptance Determinants: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda

The reliance on animal husbandry for protein has caused environmental, social and ethical challenges worldwide, yet the demand for animal-based food continues to rise. Despite the increasing attention from scholars and professionals on the potential of cultured meat (CM) as a viable alternative protein source, the ensuing scholarly work still lacks coherence and is incomplete and fragmented. Its success also depends heavily on customer acceptance. This study therefore examined peer-reviewed literature on consumers' perceptions and acceptance of CM. A comprehensive search was conducted on ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and Scopus databases between 2017 and 2022, yielding 54 papers that met the selection criteria. The qualitative synthesis conducted revealed seven themes that had the highest influence on consumers' acceptance of CM. The themes identified were (i) attitudes and traits, (ii) situational impact, (iii) information and nomenclature, (iv) CM properties, (v) risk–benefit perception, (vi) familiarity and awareness and (vii) competition with other alternative proteins. This review also identified demographic predictors of consumers who are most likely to accept CM. The review found that although consumers are curious and willing to try CM, failure to address personal attitudes and traits may lead to failure in adoption. It was also found that strategies that include emotional responses are more effective in the long run.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the Future of Tech-Infused Luxury: A Roadmap and Research Directions Influencer Marketing, Narrative Transportation, and Consumer Well-Being: An Exploration of How Virtual Influencers Impact Followers' Well-Being Impact of Aging on Consumer Behavior: A Review and Research Agenda Consumer Perspectives on Food Traceability—A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda Service Quality in Spectator Sports: A Review and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1