{"title":"了解网络 Meta 分析:护士实用入门》。","authors":"Amir Masoud Sharifnia,Erik Biros,Michelle Cleary","doi":"10.1111/jan.16421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nThis paper examines network meta-analysis (NMA) as a methodological advancement in nursing research and discusses considerations for interpreting and applying NMA results in clinical practice.\r\n\r\nDESIGN AND METHODS\r\nMethodological discussion.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe NMA method simultaneously evaluates multiple interventions by combining direct and indirect evidence. The publication of NMA articles in nursing journals has been increasing. However, interpreting NMA results can be complex and challenging. In this paper, we outline the prerequisites and assumptions of NMA, provide a graphical representation, discuss effect estimation and quality of evidence and give an overview of applying NMA results in clinical practice.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nNMA is a valuable analytical approach in nursing research that can provide high-level evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Accurate interpretation of NMA findings is necessary to inform clinical practice. This paper serves as an introduction to NMA for nurses unfamiliar with the approach.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION\r\nNMA is a powerful statistical technique for assessing the relative effectiveness of different nursing interventions and informing evidence-based nursing guidelines. When interpreting the results, nurses should consider the certainty of evidence and the practical value of the results and be cautious of misleading conclusions.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nNMA is a recent analytical method in nursing research. This practical introduction seeks to enhance comprehension of NMA and the interpretation and application of NMA findings in clinical practice. NMA is a robust statistical technique to assess the relative effectiveness of various nursing interventions.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nIn the methodological discussion guide, no new data was generated. A hypothetical dataset was used.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nThis methodological paper contributes to understanding NMA and interpreting its results, integrating it into clinical practice, and improving patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Network Meta-Analysis: A Practical Introduction for Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Masoud Sharifnia,Erik Biros,Michelle Cleary\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS\\r\\nThis paper examines network meta-analysis (NMA) as a methodological advancement in nursing research and discusses considerations for interpreting and applying NMA results in clinical practice.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN AND METHODS\\r\\nMethodological discussion.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe NMA method simultaneously evaluates multiple interventions by combining direct and indirect evidence. The publication of NMA articles in nursing journals has been increasing. However, interpreting NMA results can be complex and challenging. In this paper, we outline the prerequisites and assumptions of NMA, provide a graphical representation, discuss effect estimation and quality of evidence and give an overview of applying NMA results in clinical practice.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nNMA is a valuable analytical approach in nursing research that can provide high-level evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Accurate interpretation of NMA findings is necessary to inform clinical practice. This paper serves as an introduction to NMA for nurses unfamiliar with the approach.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION\\r\\nNMA is a powerful statistical technique for assessing the relative effectiveness of different nursing interventions and informing evidence-based nursing guidelines. When interpreting the results, nurses should consider the certainty of evidence and the practical value of the results and be cautious of misleading conclusions.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPACT\\r\\nNMA is a recent analytical method in nursing research. This practical introduction seeks to enhance comprehension of NMA and the interpretation and application of NMA findings in clinical practice. NMA is a robust statistical technique to assess the relative effectiveness of various nursing interventions.\\r\\n\\r\\nREPORTING METHOD\\r\\nIn the methodological discussion guide, no new data was generated. A hypothetical dataset was used.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\\r\\nThis methodological paper contributes to understanding NMA and interpreting its results, integrating it into clinical practice, and improving patient outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16421\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Network Meta-Analysis: A Practical Introduction for Nurses.
AIMS
This paper examines network meta-analysis (NMA) as a methodological advancement in nursing research and discusses considerations for interpreting and applying NMA results in clinical practice.
DESIGN AND METHODS
Methodological discussion.
RESULTS
The NMA method simultaneously evaluates multiple interventions by combining direct and indirect evidence. The publication of NMA articles in nursing journals has been increasing. However, interpreting NMA results can be complex and challenging. In this paper, we outline the prerequisites and assumptions of NMA, provide a graphical representation, discuss effect estimation and quality of evidence and give an overview of applying NMA results in clinical practice.
CONCLUSION
NMA is a valuable analytical approach in nursing research that can provide high-level evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Accurate interpretation of NMA findings is necessary to inform clinical practice. This paper serves as an introduction to NMA for nurses unfamiliar with the approach.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION
NMA is a powerful statistical technique for assessing the relative effectiveness of different nursing interventions and informing evidence-based nursing guidelines. When interpreting the results, nurses should consider the certainty of evidence and the practical value of the results and be cautious of misleading conclusions.
IMPACT
NMA is a recent analytical method in nursing research. This practical introduction seeks to enhance comprehension of NMA and the interpretation and application of NMA findings in clinical practice. NMA is a robust statistical technique to assess the relative effectiveness of various nursing interventions.
REPORTING METHOD
In the methodological discussion guide, no new data was generated. A hypothetical dataset was used.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
This methodological paper contributes to understanding NMA and interpreting its results, integrating it into clinical practice, and improving patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.