Rathnam K Venkat, Robert A Redd, Amyah C Harris, Martin J Aryee, Anna E Marneth, Baransel Kamaz, Chulwoo J Kim, Mohammed Wazir, Lachelle D Weeks, Maximilian Stahl, Daniel J DeAngelo, R Coleman Lindsley, Marlise R Luskin, Gabriela S Hobbs, Joan How
{"title":"血小板极度增多的 Essential Thrombocythemia 患者的出血风险。","authors":"Rathnam K Venkat, Robert A Redd, Amyah C Harris, Martin J Aryee, Anna E Marneth, Baransel Kamaz, Chulwoo J Kim, Mohammed Wazir, Lachelle D Weeks, Maximilian Stahl, Daniel J DeAngelo, R Coleman Lindsley, Marlise R Luskin, Gabriela S Hobbs, Joan How","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Approximately 25% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) present with extreme thrombocytosis (ExT), defined as having a platelet count ≥1000 × 109/L. ExT patients may have an increased bleeding risk associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ExT vs non-ExT patients with ET at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 to 2022 to inform treatment decisions. We abstracted the first major bleed, clinically relevant nonmajor bleed (CRNMB), and thrombotic events from medical records. We identified 128 ExT patients (28%) and 323 non-ExT patients (72%). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was not different in ExT vs non-ExT patients (21% vs 13% [P = .28] for major bleed; 16% vs 15% [P = .50] for CRNMB). Very low and low thrombotic risk ExT patients were more likely to be cytoreduced than very low- and low-risk non-ExT patients (69% vs 50% [P = .060] for very low risk; 83% vs 53% [P = .0059] for low risk). However, we found no differences in bleeding between ExT and non-ExT patients when restricting the risk of bleed from diagnosis to cytoreduction start date (28% vs 19% [P = .29] for major bleed; 24% vs 22% [P = .75] for CRNMB). Cumulative incidence of thrombosis was also not different between ExT and non-ExT patients (28% vs 25%; P = .98). This suggests that cytoreduction may not be necessary to reduce bleeding risk based only on a platelet count of 1 million. We identified novel risk factors for bleeding in patients with ET including diabetes mellitus and the DNMT3A mutation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":"6043-6054"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of bleeding in patients with essential thrombocythemia and extreme thrombocytosis.\",\"authors\":\"Rathnam K Venkat, Robert A Redd, Amyah C Harris, Martin J Aryee, Anna E Marneth, Baransel Kamaz, Chulwoo J Kim, Mohammed Wazir, Lachelle D Weeks, Maximilian Stahl, Daniel J DeAngelo, R Coleman Lindsley, Marlise R Luskin, Gabriela S Hobbs, Joan How\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Approximately 25% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) present with extreme thrombocytosis (ExT), defined as having a platelet count ≥1000 × 109/L. ExT patients may have an increased bleeding risk associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ExT vs non-ExT patients with ET at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 to 2022 to inform treatment decisions. We abstracted the first major bleed, clinically relevant nonmajor bleed (CRNMB), and thrombotic events from medical records. We identified 128 ExT patients (28%) and 323 non-ExT patients (72%). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was not different in ExT vs non-ExT patients (21% vs 13% [P = .28] for major bleed; 16% vs 15% [P = .50] for CRNMB). Very low and low thrombotic risk ExT patients were more likely to be cytoreduced than very low- and low-risk non-ExT patients (69% vs 50% [P = .060] for very low risk; 83% vs 53% [P = .0059] for low risk). However, we found no differences in bleeding between ExT and non-ExT patients when restricting the risk of bleed from diagnosis to cytoreduction start date (28% vs 19% [P = .29] for major bleed; 24% vs 22% [P = .75] for CRNMB). Cumulative incidence of thrombosis was also not different between ExT and non-ExT patients (28% vs 25%; P = .98). This suggests that cytoreduction may not be necessary to reduce bleeding risk based only on a platelet count of 1 million. We identified novel risk factors for bleeding in patients with ET including diabetes mellitus and the DNMT3A mutation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6043-6054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk of bleeding in patients with essential thrombocythemia and extreme thrombocytosis.
Abstract: Approximately 25% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) present with extreme thrombocytosis (ExT), defined as having a platelet count ≥1000 × 109/L. ExT patients may have an increased bleeding risk associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ExT vs non-ExT patients with ET at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 to 2022 to inform treatment decisions. We abstracted the first major bleed, clinically relevant nonmajor bleed (CRNMB), and thrombotic events from medical records. We identified 128 ExT patients (28%) and 323 non-ExT patients (72%). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was not different in ExT vs non-ExT patients (21% vs 13% [P = .28] for major bleed; 16% vs 15% [P = .50] for CRNMB). Very low and low thrombotic risk ExT patients were more likely to be cytoreduced than very low- and low-risk non-ExT patients (69% vs 50% [P = .060] for very low risk; 83% vs 53% [P = .0059] for low risk). However, we found no differences in bleeding between ExT and non-ExT patients when restricting the risk of bleed from diagnosis to cytoreduction start date (28% vs 19% [P = .29] for major bleed; 24% vs 22% [P = .75] for CRNMB). Cumulative incidence of thrombosis was also not different between ExT and non-ExT patients (28% vs 25%; P = .98). This suggests that cytoreduction may not be necessary to reduce bleeding risk based only on a platelet count of 1 million. We identified novel risk factors for bleeding in patients with ET including diabetes mellitus and the DNMT3A mutation.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.