血小板极度增多的 Essential Thrombocythemia 患者的出血风险。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood advances Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777
Rathnam K Venkat, Robert A Redd, Amyah C Harris, Martin J Aryee, Anna E Marneth, Baransel Kamaz, Chulwoo J Kim, Mohammed Wazir, Lachelle D Weeks, Maximilian Stahl, Daniel J DeAngelo, R Coleman Lindsley, Marlise R Luskin, Gabriela S Hobbs, Joan How
{"title":"血小板极度增多的 Essential Thrombocythemia 患者的出血风险。","authors":"Rathnam K Venkat, Robert A Redd, Amyah C Harris, Martin J Aryee, Anna E Marneth, Baransel Kamaz, Chulwoo J Kim, Mohammed Wazir, Lachelle D Weeks, Maximilian Stahl, Daniel J DeAngelo, R Coleman Lindsley, Marlise R Luskin, Gabriela S Hobbs, Joan How","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Approximately 25% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) present with extreme thrombocytosis (ExT), defined as having a platelet count ≥1000 × 109/L. ExT patients may have an increased bleeding risk associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ExT vs non-ExT patients with ET at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 to 2022 to inform treatment decisions. We abstracted the first major bleed, clinically relevant nonmajor bleed (CRNMB), and thrombotic events from medical records. We identified 128 ExT patients (28%) and 323 non-ExT patients (72%). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was not different in ExT vs non-ExT patients (21% vs 13% [P = .28] for major bleed; 16% vs 15% [P = .50] for CRNMB). Very low and low thrombotic risk ExT patients were more likely to be cytoreduced than very low- and low-risk non-ExT patients (69% vs 50% [P = .060] for very low risk; 83% vs 53% [P = .0059] for low risk). However, we found no differences in bleeding between ExT and non-ExT patients when restricting the risk of bleed from diagnosis to cytoreduction start date (28% vs 19% [P = .29] for major bleed; 24% vs 22% [P = .75] for CRNMB). Cumulative incidence of thrombosis was also not different between ExT and non-ExT patients (28% vs 25%; P = .98). This suggests that cytoreduction may not be necessary to reduce bleeding risk based only on a platelet count of 1 million. We identified novel risk factors for bleeding in patients with ET including diabetes mellitus and the DNMT3A mutation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":"6043-6054"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of bleeding in patients with essential thrombocythemia and extreme thrombocytosis.\",\"authors\":\"Rathnam K Venkat, Robert A Redd, Amyah C Harris, Martin J Aryee, Anna E Marneth, Baransel Kamaz, Chulwoo J Kim, Mohammed Wazir, Lachelle D Weeks, Maximilian Stahl, Daniel J DeAngelo, R Coleman Lindsley, Marlise R Luskin, Gabriela S Hobbs, Joan How\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Approximately 25% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) present with extreme thrombocytosis (ExT), defined as having a platelet count ≥1000 × 109/L. ExT patients may have an increased bleeding risk associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ExT vs non-ExT patients with ET at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 to 2022 to inform treatment decisions. We abstracted the first major bleed, clinically relevant nonmajor bleed (CRNMB), and thrombotic events from medical records. We identified 128 ExT patients (28%) and 323 non-ExT patients (72%). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was not different in ExT vs non-ExT patients (21% vs 13% [P = .28] for major bleed; 16% vs 15% [P = .50] for CRNMB). Very low and low thrombotic risk ExT patients were more likely to be cytoreduced than very low- and low-risk non-ExT patients (69% vs 50% [P = .060] for very low risk; 83% vs 53% [P = .0059] for low risk). However, we found no differences in bleeding between ExT and non-ExT patients when restricting the risk of bleed from diagnosis to cytoreduction start date (28% vs 19% [P = .29] for major bleed; 24% vs 22% [P = .75] for CRNMB). Cumulative incidence of thrombosis was also not different between ExT and non-ExT patients (28% vs 25%; P = .98). This suggests that cytoreduction may not be necessary to reduce bleeding risk based only on a platelet count of 1 million. We identified novel risk factors for bleeding in patients with ET including diabetes mellitus and the DNMT3A mutation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6043-6054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约 25% 的原发性血小板增多症(ET)患者会出现极度血小板增多症(ExT),即血小板计数≥1000 x 10^9/L。ExT 患者可能会因获得性冯-威廉综合征而增加出血风险。我们回顾性分析了 2014-2022 年间丹娜法伯癌症研究所和马萨诸塞州总医院 ExT 与非 ExT ET 患者的出血和血栓形成风险,为治疗决策提供参考。我们从医疗记录中抽取了首次大出血、临床相关非大出血(CRNMB)和血栓事件。我们确定了 128 例(28%)ExT 患者和 323 例(72%)非 ExT 患者。ExT患者与非ExT患者的出血累积发生率没有差异(大出血为21%对13%,P=0.28;CRNMB为16%对15%,P=0.50)。与极低和低风险的非 ExT 患者相比,极低和低血栓风险的 ExT 患者更有可能接受细胞减灭术(极低风险为 69% 对 50%,P=0.060;低风险为 83% 对 53%,P=0.0059)。然而,如果限制从诊断到细胞减灭术开始日期的出血风险,我们发现 ExT 和非 ExT 患者的出血情况没有差异(大出血为 28% 对 19%,P=0.29;CRNMB 为 24% 对 22%,P=0.75)。血栓形成的累积发生率在 ExT 和非 ExT 患者之间也没有差异(28% 对 25%,P=0.98)。这表明,仅根据 100 万的血小板计数来降低出血风险可能并不需要进行细胞减灭术。我们发现了 ET 患者出血的新风险因素,包括糖尿病和 DNMT3A 突变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of bleeding in patients with essential thrombocythemia and extreme thrombocytosis.

Abstract: Approximately 25% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) present with extreme thrombocytosis (ExT), defined as having a platelet count ≥1000 × 109/L. ExT patients may have an increased bleeding risk associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ExT vs non-ExT patients with ET at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 to 2022 to inform treatment decisions. We abstracted the first major bleed, clinically relevant nonmajor bleed (CRNMB), and thrombotic events from medical records. We identified 128 ExT patients (28%) and 323 non-ExT patients (72%). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was not different in ExT vs non-ExT patients (21% vs 13% [P = .28] for major bleed; 16% vs 15% [P = .50] for CRNMB). Very low and low thrombotic risk ExT patients were more likely to be cytoreduced than very low- and low-risk non-ExT patients (69% vs 50% [P = .060] for very low risk; 83% vs 53% [P = .0059] for low risk). However, we found no differences in bleeding between ExT and non-ExT patients when restricting the risk of bleed from diagnosis to cytoreduction start date (28% vs 19% [P = .29] for major bleed; 24% vs 22% [P = .75] for CRNMB). Cumulative incidence of thrombosis was also not different between ExT and non-ExT patients (28% vs 25%; P = .98). This suggests that cytoreduction may not be necessary to reduce bleeding risk based only on a platelet count of 1 million. We identified novel risk factors for bleeding in patients with ET including diabetes mellitus and the DNMT3A mutation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
期刊最新文献
American Society of Hematology: Building a Comprehensive Minority Recruitment and Retention Professional Program. Ancestral β-globin gene haplotypes modify β-thalassemia severity in a mouse model. Effect of rabbit ATG PK on outcomes after TCR-αβ/CD19-depleted pediatric haploidentical HCT for hematologic malignancy. Iron deficiency resolution and time to resolution in an American health system. Risk of bleeding in patients with essential thrombocythemia and extreme thrombocytosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1