使用虚拟平衡装置进行平衡感觉互动临床测试的可靠性。

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Sonia N Young, Elizabeth S Norris, Thomas B Shifflett, Daniel B Nisbet, Brady E Saunders, Caleb Z Driver
{"title":"使用虚拟平衡装置进行平衡感觉互动临床测试的可靠性。","authors":"Sonia N Young, Elizabeth S Norris, Thomas B Shifflett, Daniel B Nisbet, Brady E Saunders, Caleb Z Driver","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the instrumented version of the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (i-mCTSIB) using the VirtuSense VirtuBalance System™ (VSTBalance), a virtual balance device, in healthy young adults. Fifty-four subjects aged 20-27 years (Mean age 23.07, SD ± 1.6), participated in the study. A one-group design was utilized. Three trials of the i-mCTSIB were performed on two separate days to measure the mean sway velocity of the trunk under four conditions. Within-day reliability of trials 1-3 was estimated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>) and between-day reliability was estimated using the averages of trials 1-3 on day 1 and day 2 (ICC<sub>3,3</sub>). Within-day reliability was moderate on day 1 (ICC = 0.511-0.672) and day 2 (ICC = 0.539 -0.677). Between-day reliability was moderate to good (ICC = 0.705-0.810). The lower bounds of the confidence intervals of within-day reliability estimates were 0.341-0.548, while the lower bounds of the confidence interval for the between-day reliability estimates were 0.390-0.671. Reliability of the VSTBalance for balance assessment using the i-mCTSIB test is moderate to good. Between-day reliability was higher than within-day reliability. When using the VSTBalance to assess balance with the i-mCTSIB, clinicians should provide practice of each condition contained in the test to improve reliability. The higher between-day reliability as compared to within-day reliability suggests that clinicians should use the averages of three trials when assessing balance performance change across time for each condition of the i-mCTSIB test when assessing balance using the VSTBalance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 1","pages":"1183-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of the Instrumented Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance Using a Virtual Balance Device.\",\"authors\":\"Sonia N Young, Elizabeth S Norris, Thomas B Shifflett, Daniel B Nisbet, Brady E Saunders, Caleb Z Driver\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the instrumented version of the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (i-mCTSIB) using the VirtuSense VirtuBalance System™ (VSTBalance), a virtual balance device, in healthy young adults. Fifty-four subjects aged 20-27 years (Mean age 23.07, SD ± 1.6), participated in the study. A one-group design was utilized. Three trials of the i-mCTSIB were performed on two separate days to measure the mean sway velocity of the trunk under four conditions. Within-day reliability of trials 1-3 was estimated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>) and between-day reliability was estimated using the averages of trials 1-3 on day 1 and day 2 (ICC<sub>3,3</sub>). Within-day reliability was moderate on day 1 (ICC = 0.511-0.672) and day 2 (ICC = 0.539 -0.677). Between-day reliability was moderate to good (ICC = 0.705-0.810). The lower bounds of the confidence intervals of within-day reliability estimates were 0.341-0.548, while the lower bounds of the confidence interval for the between-day reliability estimates were 0.390-0.671. Reliability of the VSTBalance for balance assessment using the i-mCTSIB test is moderate to good. Between-day reliability was higher than within-day reliability. When using the VSTBalance to assess balance with the i-mCTSIB, clinicians should provide practice of each condition contained in the test to improve reliability. The higher between-day reliability as compared to within-day reliability suggests that clinicians should use the averages of three trials when assessing balance performance change across time for each condition of the i-mCTSIB test when assessing balance using the VSTBalance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1183-1192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385286/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是利用虚拟平衡设备 VirtuSense VirtuBalance System™ (VSTBalance),评估改良版临床平衡感觉互动测试(i-mCTSIB)仪器版在健康年轻人中的测试-再测可靠性。54名年龄在20-27岁之间的受试者(平均年龄23.07岁,标准差±1.6)参加了研究。研究采用单组设计。受试者在两天内分别进行了三次 i-mCTSIB 测试,以测量四种情况下躯干的平均摇摆速度。使用类内相关系数(ICC3,1)估算 1-3 次试验的日内可靠性,使用第 1 天和第 2 天 1-3 次试验的平均值(ICC3,3)估算日间可靠性。第 1 天 (ICC = 0.511-0.672) 和第 2 天 (ICC = 0.539-0.677) 的日内可靠性为中等。日间可靠性为中等至良好(ICC = 0.705-0.810)。日内可靠性估计值的置信区间下限为 0.341-0.548,而日间可靠性估计值的置信区间下限为 0.390-0.671。使用 i-mCTSIB 测试进行平衡评估时,VSTBalance 的可靠性为中等至良好。日间可靠性高于日内可靠性。在使用 VSTBalance 评估 i-mCTSIB 平衡时,临床医生应提供测试中每种情况的练习,以提高可靠性。与日内可靠性相比,日间可靠性更高,这表明临床医生在使用 VSTBalance 评估 i-mCTSIB 测试的平衡能力时,应使用三次试验的平均值来评估 i-mCTSIB 测试中每个条件在不同时间段的平衡能力变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of the Instrumented Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance Using a Virtual Balance Device.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the instrumented version of the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (i-mCTSIB) using the VirtuSense VirtuBalance System™ (VSTBalance), a virtual balance device, in healthy young adults. Fifty-four subjects aged 20-27 years (Mean age 23.07, SD ± 1.6), participated in the study. A one-group design was utilized. Three trials of the i-mCTSIB were performed on two separate days to measure the mean sway velocity of the trunk under four conditions. Within-day reliability of trials 1-3 was estimated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1) and between-day reliability was estimated using the averages of trials 1-3 on day 1 and day 2 (ICC3,3). Within-day reliability was moderate on day 1 (ICC = 0.511-0.672) and day 2 (ICC = 0.539 -0.677). Between-day reliability was moderate to good (ICC = 0.705-0.810). The lower bounds of the confidence intervals of within-day reliability estimates were 0.341-0.548, while the lower bounds of the confidence interval for the between-day reliability estimates were 0.390-0.671. Reliability of the VSTBalance for balance assessment using the i-mCTSIB test is moderate to good. Between-day reliability was higher than within-day reliability. When using the VSTBalance to assess balance with the i-mCTSIB, clinicians should provide practice of each condition contained in the test to improve reliability. The higher between-day reliability as compared to within-day reliability suggests that clinicians should use the averages of three trials when assessing balance performance change across time for each condition of the i-mCTSIB test when assessing balance using the VSTBalance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Mental Fatigue Induced by the Stroop Test on Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Activation in Division III Female Athletes. Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of a Commercially Available Velocity Measuring Device When Performing Selected Exercises. Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth. Relative Age Effect for Different Playing Positions in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players. A Comparison of Achilles Tendon Morphological Characteristics Based Upon VISA-A Score in Active Adults Over Age 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1