SEEG 对不同侧前颞叶切除术长期疗效的影响:单中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.054
Bo Zhang, Xiongfei Wang, Jing Wang, Mengyang Wang, Yuguang Guan, Zhao Liu, Yao Zhang, Meng Zhao, Haoran Ding, Ke Xu, Jiahui Deng, Tianfu Li, Guoming Luan, Jian Zhou
{"title":"SEEG 对不同侧前颞叶切除术长期疗效的影响:单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Bo Zhang, Xiongfei Wang, Jing Wang, Mengyang Wang, Yuguang Guan, Zhao Liu, Yao Zhang, Meng Zhao, Haoran Ding, Ke Xu, Jiahui Deng, Tianfu Li, Guoming Luan, Jian Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical treatment for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) plays a critical role in precisely localizing the epileptogenic zone (EZ). This study aimed to explore the effect of SEEG on the long-term outcomes of different side ATL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2012 to February 2020, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 231 TLE patients who underwent standard ATL surgery. According to the surgical sides and the utilization of SEEG during preoperative evaluation, the patients were categorized into four groups, with a follow-up period exceeding two years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 231 TLE patients, the probability of being seizure-free two years after the surgery was 80.52%, which decreased to 65.65% after five years. There was no significant difference in outcomes between SEEG and non-SEEG patients. For overall and non-SEEG patients, there was no significant difference in short-term outcomes between different surgical sides. However, the long-term outcomes of right ATL patients were significantly better than left. Interestingly, for patients who underwent SEEG, there was no significant difference in both short-term and long-term outcomes between different surgical sides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some TLE patients encounter challenges in localizing the EZ through non-invasive evaluation, necessitating the use of SEEG for precise localization. Furthermore, their seizure outcomes after surgery can be the same with the patients who have a clear epileptogenic zone in non-invasive evaluation. And SEEG patients can achieve a more stable long-term prognosis than non-SSEEG patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of SEEG on the long-term outcomes of different side anterior temporal lobectomy: A single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Zhang, Xiongfei Wang, Jing Wang, Mengyang Wang, Yuguang Guan, Zhao Liu, Yao Zhang, Meng Zhao, Haoran Ding, Ke Xu, Jiahui Deng, Tianfu Li, Guoming Luan, Jian Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical treatment for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) plays a critical role in precisely localizing the epileptogenic zone (EZ). This study aimed to explore the effect of SEEG on the long-term outcomes of different side ATL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2012 to February 2020, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 231 TLE patients who underwent standard ATL surgery. According to the surgical sides and the utilization of SEEG during preoperative evaluation, the patients were categorized into four groups, with a follow-up period exceeding two years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 231 TLE patients, the probability of being seizure-free two years after the surgery was 80.52%, which decreased to 65.65% after five years. There was no significant difference in outcomes between SEEG and non-SEEG patients. For overall and non-SEEG patients, there was no significant difference in short-term outcomes between different surgical sides. However, the long-term outcomes of right ATL patients were significantly better than left. Interestingly, for patients who underwent SEEG, there was no significant difference in both short-term and long-term outcomes between different surgical sides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some TLE patients encounter challenges in localizing the EZ through non-invasive evaluation, necessitating the use of SEEG for precise localization. Furthermore, their seizure outcomes after surgery can be the same with the patients who have a clear epileptogenic zone in non-invasive evaluation. And SEEG patients can achieve a more stable long-term prognosis than non-SSEEG patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颞叶前部切除术(ATL)是颞叶癫痫(TLE)最常见的手术治疗方法,而立体脑电图(SEEG)在精确定位致痫区(EZ)方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在探讨SEEG对不同侧ATL长期疗效的影响:方法:2012年3月至2020年2月,对231例接受标准ATL手术的TLE患者进行回顾性分析。根据手术侧和术前评估中 SEEG 的使用情况,将患者分为四组,随访时间超过两年:在231名TLE患者中,术后两年无癫痫发作的概率为80.52%,五年后降至65.65%。SEEG和非SEEG患者的疗效无明显差异。就整体和非SEEG患者而言,不同手术侧的短期疗效无明显差异。然而,右侧ATL患者的长期疗效明显优于左侧。有趣的是,对于接受 SEEG 的患者,不同手术侧的短期和长期疗效均无明显差异:结论:一些TLE患者在通过非侵入性评估定位EZ时遇到困难,因此有必要使用SEEG进行精确定位。此外,他们术后的癫痫发作结果可能与无创评估中明确致痫区的患者相同。与非 SEEG 患者相比,SEEG 患者的长期预后更为稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of SEEG on the long-term outcomes of different side anterior temporal lobectomy: A single-center retrospective study.

Purpose: Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical treatment for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) plays a critical role in precisely localizing the epileptogenic zone (EZ). This study aimed to explore the effect of SEEG on the long-term outcomes of different side ATL.

Methods: From March 2012 to February 2020, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 231 TLE patients who underwent standard ATL surgery. According to the surgical sides and the utilization of SEEG during preoperative evaluation, the patients were categorized into four groups, with a follow-up period exceeding two years.

Results: Among the 231 TLE patients, the probability of being seizure-free two years after the surgery was 80.52%, which decreased to 65.65% after five years. There was no significant difference in outcomes between SEEG and non-SEEG patients. For overall and non-SEEG patients, there was no significant difference in short-term outcomes between different surgical sides. However, the long-term outcomes of right ATL patients were significantly better than left. Interestingly, for patients who underwent SEEG, there was no significant difference in both short-term and long-term outcomes between different surgical sides.

Conclusion: Some TLE patients encounter challenges in localizing the EZ through non-invasive evaluation, necessitating the use of SEEG for precise localization. Furthermore, their seizure outcomes after surgery can be the same with the patients who have a clear epileptogenic zone in non-invasive evaluation. And SEEG patients can achieve a more stable long-term prognosis than non-SSEEG patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review. Plasma estrogen levels and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women. Postural Change Assists Surgical Maneuverability During Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenoma. YouTube® as a Tool for Medical Education: Analyzing Content Quality and Reliability on Chiari Malformation. Evaluation of the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lamina osteotomy replantation assisted by ultrasonic bone scalpel in the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1