格列本脲对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者认知能力、生活质量和情绪方面的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.048
Isabela Costola Windlin, Bruno Braga Sisnando da Costa, João Paulo Mota Telles, Leonardo B Oliveira, Edwin Koterba, Vitor Nagai Yamaki, Nicollas Nunes Rabelo, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
{"title":"格列本脲对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者认知能力、生活质量和情绪方面的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Isabela Costola Windlin, Bruno Braga Sisnando da Costa, João Paulo Mota Telles, Leonardo B Oliveira, Edwin Koterba, Vitor Nagai Yamaki, Nicollas Nunes Rabelo, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with a high incidence of long-term cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life (QoL), and psychiatric disorders. The effects of glibenclamide on such outcomes in the setting of aSAH is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of glibenclamide in patients with aSAH on cognitive performance, QoL, and emotional aspects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients identified with aSAH were randomly allocated to receive 5mg of glibenclamide for 21 days or placebo, starting within 96 hours of the ictus. After six months, patients were evaluated with MoCA test (cognitive performance), SF-36 (QoL), and HADS and SPTSS (emotional aspects).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MoCA score was 22.5 ± 6.2. No statistically significant difference was found between groups, with a mean score of 21.7 ± 6.4 in the Glibeclamide group and 23.4 ± 6.2 in the placebo group (p=0.392). A score <23 was observed in 16 patients (35.6%) and its frequency was similar between groups (p=0.900). The most frequently impaired domains were Attention (N=21/45; 46.7%) and Visuospatial (18/45; 40.0%). Impairment of each domain was similar between groups (p>0.05). In each domain, the mean score was similar between groups (p>0.05). The HADS scores did not differ between groups (p>0.05). The mean SPTSS score as well as the mean scores of its domains were similar between groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Glibenclamide did not improve cognitive performance, QoL, and emotional aspects after six months of follow-up of aSAH survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECTS OF GLIBENCLAMIDE ON COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND EMOTIONAL ASPECTS AMONG PATIENTS WITH ANEURYSMAL SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.\",\"authors\":\"Isabela Costola Windlin, Bruno Braga Sisnando da Costa, João Paulo Mota Telles, Leonardo B Oliveira, Edwin Koterba, Vitor Nagai Yamaki, Nicollas Nunes Rabelo, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with a high incidence of long-term cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life (QoL), and psychiatric disorders. The effects of glibenclamide on such outcomes in the setting of aSAH is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of glibenclamide in patients with aSAH on cognitive performance, QoL, and emotional aspects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients identified with aSAH were randomly allocated to receive 5mg of glibenclamide for 21 days or placebo, starting within 96 hours of the ictus. After six months, patients were evaluated with MoCA test (cognitive performance), SF-36 (QoL), and HADS and SPTSS (emotional aspects).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MoCA score was 22.5 ± 6.2. No statistically significant difference was found between groups, with a mean score of 21.7 ± 6.4 in the Glibeclamide group and 23.4 ± 6.2 in the placebo group (p=0.392). A score <23 was observed in 16 patients (35.6%) and its frequency was similar between groups (p=0.900). The most frequently impaired domains were Attention (N=21/45; 46.7%) and Visuospatial (18/45; 40.0%). Impairment of each domain was similar between groups (p>0.05). In each domain, the mean score was similar between groups (p>0.05). The HADS scores did not differ between groups (p>0.05). The mean SPTSS score as well as the mean scores of its domains were similar between groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Glibenclamide did not improve cognitive performance, QoL, and emotional aspects after six months of follow-up of aSAH survivors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)与长期认知障碍、生活质量(QoL)下降和精神障碍的高发病率有关。格列本脲对发生蛛网膜下腔出血时上述结果的影响尚不清楚:评估格列本脲对 aSAH 患者认知能力、生活质量和情绪方面的影响:方法:被确诊为 ASAH 的患者被随机分配到接受 5 毫克格列本脲治疗 21 天或安慰剂治疗 21 天,治疗从发作后 96 小时内开始。6个月后,对患者进行MoCA测试(认知能力)、SF-36(QoL)以及HADS和SPTSS(情绪方面)评估:平均 MoCA 得分为 22.5 ± 6.2。格列吡嗪组的平均得分为(21.7 ± 6.4),安慰剂组为(23.4 ± 6.2)(P=0.392)。A 得分 0.05)。在每个领域,各组的平均得分相似(p>0.05)。组间的 HADS 评分没有差异(P>0.05)。各组的 SPTSS 平均得分及其各领域的平均得分相似(P>0.05):结论:格列本脲并没有改善急性脑梗死幸存者随访六个月后的认知能力、生活质量和情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE EFFECTS OF GLIBENCLAMIDE ON COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND EMOTIONAL ASPECTS AMONG PATIENTS WITH ANEURYSMAL SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Introduction: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with a high incidence of long-term cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life (QoL), and psychiatric disorders. The effects of glibenclamide on such outcomes in the setting of aSAH is unknown.

Objective: To assess the impact of glibenclamide in patients with aSAH on cognitive performance, QoL, and emotional aspects.

Methods: Patients identified with aSAH were randomly allocated to receive 5mg of glibenclamide for 21 days or placebo, starting within 96 hours of the ictus. After six months, patients were evaluated with MoCA test (cognitive performance), SF-36 (QoL), and HADS and SPTSS (emotional aspects).

Results: The mean MoCA score was 22.5 ± 6.2. No statistically significant difference was found between groups, with a mean score of 21.7 ± 6.4 in the Glibeclamide group and 23.4 ± 6.2 in the placebo group (p=0.392). A score <23 was observed in 16 patients (35.6%) and its frequency was similar between groups (p=0.900). The most frequently impaired domains were Attention (N=21/45; 46.7%) and Visuospatial (18/45; 40.0%). Impairment of each domain was similar between groups (p>0.05). In each domain, the mean score was similar between groups (p>0.05). The HADS scores did not differ between groups (p>0.05). The mean SPTSS score as well as the mean scores of its domains were similar between groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Glibenclamide did not improve cognitive performance, QoL, and emotional aspects after six months of follow-up of aSAH survivors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review. Plasma estrogen levels and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women. Postural Change Assists Surgical Maneuverability During Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenoma. YouTube® as a Tool for Medical Education: Analyzing Content Quality and Reliability on Chiari Malformation. Evaluation of the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lamina osteotomy replantation assisted by ultrasonic bone scalpel in the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1