人工智能在呼吸护理中的应用:知识、认知和实践--一项横断面研究。

IF 3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1451963
Jithin K Sreedharan, Asma Alharbi, Amal Alsomali, Gokul Krishna Gopalakrishnan, Abdullah Almojaibel, Rawan Alajmi, Ibrahim Albalawi, Musallam Alnasser, Meshal Alenezi, Abdullah Alqahtani, Mohammed Alahmari, Eidan Alzahrani, Manjush Karthika
{"title":"人工智能在呼吸护理中的应用:知识、认知和实践--一项横断面研究。","authors":"Jithin K Sreedharan, Asma Alharbi, Amal Alsomali, Gokul Krishna Gopalakrishnan, Abdullah Almojaibel, Rawan Alajmi, Ibrahim Albalawi, Musallam Alnasser, Meshal Alenezi, Abdullah Alqahtani, Mohammed Alahmari, Eidan Alzahrani, Manjush Karthika","doi":"10.3389/frai.2024.1451963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is reforming healthcare, particularly in respiratory medicine and critical care, by utilizing big and synthetic data to improve diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic benefits. This survey aimed to evaluate the knowledge, perceptions, and practices of respiratory therapists (RTs) regarding AI to effectively incorporate these technologies into the clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study approved by the institutional review board, aimed at the RTs working in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The validated questionnaire collected reflective insights from 448 RTs in Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, Fisher's exact test, and chi-square test were used to evaluate the significance of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey revealed a nearly equal distribution of genders (51% female, 49% male). Most respondents were in the 20-25 age group (54%), held bachelor's degrees (69%), and had 0-5 years of experience (73%). While 28% had some knowledge of AI, only 8.5% had practical experience. Significant gender disparities in AI knowledge were noted (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Key findings included 59% advocating for basics of AI in the curriculum, 51% believing AI would play a vital role in respiratory care, and 41% calling for specialized AI personnel. Major challenges identified included knowledge deficiencies (23%), skill enhancement (23%), and limited access to training (17%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this study highlights differences in the levels of knowledge and perceptions regarding AI among respiratory care professionals, underlining its recognized significance and futuristic awareness in the field. Tailored education and strategic planning are crucial for enhancing the quality of respiratory care, with the integration of AI. Addressing these gaps is essential for utilizing the full potential of AI in advancing respiratory care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"1451963"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in respiratory care: knowledge, perceptions, and practices-a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Jithin K Sreedharan, Asma Alharbi, Amal Alsomali, Gokul Krishna Gopalakrishnan, Abdullah Almojaibel, Rawan Alajmi, Ibrahim Albalawi, Musallam Alnasser, Meshal Alenezi, Abdullah Alqahtani, Mohammed Alahmari, Eidan Alzahrani, Manjush Karthika\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frai.2024.1451963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is reforming healthcare, particularly in respiratory medicine and critical care, by utilizing big and synthetic data to improve diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic benefits. This survey aimed to evaluate the knowledge, perceptions, and practices of respiratory therapists (RTs) regarding AI to effectively incorporate these technologies into the clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study approved by the institutional review board, aimed at the RTs working in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The validated questionnaire collected reflective insights from 448 RTs in Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, Fisher's exact test, and chi-square test were used to evaluate the significance of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey revealed a nearly equal distribution of genders (51% female, 49% male). Most respondents were in the 20-25 age group (54%), held bachelor's degrees (69%), and had 0-5 years of experience (73%). While 28% had some knowledge of AI, only 8.5% had practical experience. Significant gender disparities in AI knowledge were noted (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Key findings included 59% advocating for basics of AI in the curriculum, 51% believing AI would play a vital role in respiratory care, and 41% calling for specialized AI personnel. Major challenges identified included knowledge deficiencies (23%), skill enhancement (23%), and limited access to training (17%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this study highlights differences in the levels of knowledge and perceptions regarding AI among respiratory care professionals, underlining its recognized significance and futuristic awareness in the field. Tailored education and strategic planning are crucial for enhancing the quality of respiratory care, with the integration of AI. Addressing these gaps is essential for utilizing the full potential of AI in advancing respiratory care practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1451963\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405306/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1451963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1451963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)通过利用大数据和合成数据提高诊断准确性和治疗效果,正在改革医疗保健,尤其是呼吸内科和重症监护领域。本调查旨在评估呼吸治疗师(RTs)对人工智能的认识、看法和实践,以便有效地将这些技术融入临床实践:这项研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,对象是在沙特阿拉伯王国工作的呼吸治疗师。经过验证的调查问卷收集了沙特阿拉伯 448 名 RT 的反思性见解。研究采用了描述性统计、专题分析、费雪精确检验和卡方检验来评估数据的显著性:调查显示,受访者的性别分布几乎相等(51% 为女性,49% 为男性)。大多数受访者年龄在 20-25 岁之间(54%),拥有学士学位(69%),工作经验为 0-5 年(73%)。虽然 28% 的受访者对人工智能有一定了解,但只有 8.5% 的受访者有实际经验。在人工智能知识方面存在显著的性别差异(P 结语):总之,本研究强调了呼吸护理专业人员对人工智能的认知水平和看法的差异,突出了人工智能在该领域的公认意义和未来意识。有针对性的教育和战略规划对于结合人工智能提高呼吸护理质量至关重要。要充分发挥人工智能在推进呼吸护理实践中的潜力,解决这些差距至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence in respiratory care: knowledge, perceptions, and practices-a cross-sectional study.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is reforming healthcare, particularly in respiratory medicine and critical care, by utilizing big and synthetic data to improve diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic benefits. This survey aimed to evaluate the knowledge, perceptions, and practices of respiratory therapists (RTs) regarding AI to effectively incorporate these technologies into the clinical practice.

Methods: The study approved by the institutional review board, aimed at the RTs working in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The validated questionnaire collected reflective insights from 448 RTs in Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, Fisher's exact test, and chi-square test were used to evaluate the significance of the data.

Results: The survey revealed a nearly equal distribution of genders (51% female, 49% male). Most respondents were in the 20-25 age group (54%), held bachelor's degrees (69%), and had 0-5 years of experience (73%). While 28% had some knowledge of AI, only 8.5% had practical experience. Significant gender disparities in AI knowledge were noted (p < 0.001). Key findings included 59% advocating for basics of AI in the curriculum, 51% believing AI would play a vital role in respiratory care, and 41% calling for specialized AI personnel. Major challenges identified included knowledge deficiencies (23%), skill enhancement (23%), and limited access to training (17%).

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study highlights differences in the levels of knowledge and perceptions regarding AI among respiratory care professionals, underlining its recognized significance and futuristic awareness in the field. Tailored education and strategic planning are crucial for enhancing the quality of respiratory care, with the integration of AI. Addressing these gaps is essential for utilizing the full potential of AI in advancing respiratory care practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A review on deep learning methods for heart sound signal analysis. AI assistance in enterprise UX design workflows: enhancing design brief creation for designers. Supporting long-term condition management: a workflow framework for the co-development and operationalization of machine learning models using electronic health record data insights. Advancements, challenges, and future prospects of smart grid technology in India. Exploring the utilization and deficiencies of Generative Artificial Intelligence in students' cognitive and emotional needs: a systematic mini-review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1