数字乳腺断层扫描筛查提高了台湾早期乳腺癌的检测率和存活率。

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1093/jbi/wbae044
Pei-Shan Wu, Yu-Ting Hong, Chiao-Hsuan Shen, Chao-Hsien Lee, Chen-Pin Chou
{"title":"数字乳腺断层扫描筛查提高了台湾早期乳腺癌的检测率和存活率。","authors":"Pei-Shan Wu, Yu-Ting Hong, Chiao-Hsuan Shen, Chao-Hsien Lee, Chen-Pin Chou","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to compare the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening and their impact on long-term overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 48 549 consecutive mammography examinations between 2011 and 2015 at a medical center in Taiwan, identifying 545 women who were screened and diagnosed with breast cancer. Digital mammography and DBT examinations were alternated on different days. Patients were categorized based on mammographic modality, breast density, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. To determine the long-term outcome until August 2021, survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 53.2 years. Digital breast tomosynthesis examinations were significantly associated with early breast cancer (AJCC stage 0 to 2) (P = .022). The 5- and 9-year OS rates for all patients were 96.8% and 93.0%, respectively. The 5- and 9-year OS was significantly greater in the DBT group (98.4% and 96.8%) compared with the DM group (95.0% and 90.4%) (P = .030 for all). The K-M survival analysis demonstrated a significantly higher OS in the DBT group than the DM group (P = .037). Furthermore, DBT significantly improved OS in a cohort of women with stage II and III cancer (P = .032) and heterogeneously dense breasts (P = .045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening with DBT is associated with early breast cancer diagnosis and higher survival rates compared with DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Improves Early Breast Cancer Detection and Survival in Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Shan Wu, Yu-Ting Hong, Chiao-Hsuan Shen, Chao-Hsien Lee, Chen-Pin Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbi/wbae044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to compare the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening and their impact on long-term overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 48 549 consecutive mammography examinations between 2011 and 2015 at a medical center in Taiwan, identifying 545 women who were screened and diagnosed with breast cancer. Digital mammography and DBT examinations were alternated on different days. Patients were categorized based on mammographic modality, breast density, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. To determine the long-term outcome until August 2021, survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 53.2 years. Digital breast tomosynthesis examinations were significantly associated with early breast cancer (AJCC stage 0 to 2) (P = .022). The 5- and 9-year OS rates for all patients were 96.8% and 93.0%, respectively. The 5- and 9-year OS was significantly greater in the DBT group (98.4% and 96.8%) compared with the DM group (95.0% and 90.4%) (P = .030 for all). The K-M survival analysis demonstrated a significantly higher OS in the DBT group than the DM group (P = .037). Furthermore, DBT significantly improved OS in a cohort of women with stage II and III cancer (P = .032) and heterogeneously dense breasts (P = .045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening with DBT is associated with early breast cancer diagnosis and higher survival rates compared with DM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbae044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbae044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们的目的是比较数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)和数字乳腺X光摄影术(DM)在乳腺癌筛查中的疗效及其对长期总生存率(OS)的影响:研究涉及台湾一家医疗中心在2011年至2015年期间进行的48 549次连续乳腺X光检查,确定了545名接受筛查并确诊为乳腺癌的女性。数字乳腺 X 线照相术和 DBT 检查在不同日期交替进行。患者根据乳腺X光检查方式、乳腺密度和美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期进行分类。为了确定直到2021年8月的长期结果,我们使用卡普兰-梅耶(K-M)生存分析法对生存率进行了分析:结果:确诊乳腺癌时的平均年龄为 53.2 岁。数字乳腺断层合成检查与早期乳腺癌(AJCC 0 至 2 期)显著相关(P = .022)。所有患者的 5 年和 9 年 OS 率分别为 96.8% 和 93.0%。与 DM 组(95.0% 和 90.4%)相比,DBT 组的 5 年和 9 年生存率(98.4% 和 96.8%)明显更高(P = .030)。K-M 生存分析显示,DBT 组的 OS 明显高于 DM 组(P = .037)。此外,DBT还能明显改善II期和III期癌症(P = .032)以及异质性致密乳房(P = .045)妇女的OS:结论:与 DM 相比,DBT 筛查与早期乳腺癌诊断和更高的生存率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Improves Early Breast Cancer Detection and Survival in Taiwan.

Objective: Our objective was to compare the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening and their impact on long-term overall survival (OS).

Methods: The study involved 48 549 consecutive mammography examinations between 2011 and 2015 at a medical center in Taiwan, identifying 545 women who were screened and diagnosed with breast cancer. Digital mammography and DBT examinations were alternated on different days. Patients were categorized based on mammographic modality, breast density, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. To determine the long-term outcome until August 2021, survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis.

Results: The mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 53.2 years. Digital breast tomosynthesis examinations were significantly associated with early breast cancer (AJCC stage 0 to 2) (P = .022). The 5- and 9-year OS rates for all patients were 96.8% and 93.0%, respectively. The 5- and 9-year OS was significantly greater in the DBT group (98.4% and 96.8%) compared with the DM group (95.0% and 90.4%) (P = .030 for all). The K-M survival analysis demonstrated a significantly higher OS in the DBT group than the DM group (P = .037). Furthermore, DBT significantly improved OS in a cohort of women with stage II and III cancer (P = .032) and heterogeneously dense breasts (P = .045).

Conclusion: Screening with DBT is associated with early breast cancer diagnosis and higher survival rates compared with DM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Performance of Abbreviated Breast MRI in High-Risk Patients in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center. Developing a Career as a Clinician-Educator in Breast Imaging. Unknown Case: Non-mass Enhancement on Baseline MRI. Developing Financial Acumen as a Breast Imaging Radiologist. Methodological Considerations in Evaluating Breast Cancer Screening Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1