定性洞察医疗保健专业人员在为希腊 LGBTQI+ 社区成员提供公平和以患者为中心的医疗保健服务时所遇到的障碍。

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1177/15248399241275632
Ilias Pagkozidis, Anna Bettina Haidich, Loukas Athanasiadis, Theodoros Dardavesis, Zoi Tsimtsiou
{"title":"定性洞察医疗保健专业人员在为希腊 LGBTQI+ 社区成员提供公平和以患者为中心的医疗保健服务时所遇到的障碍。","authors":"Ilias Pagkozidis, Anna Bettina Haidich, Loukas Athanasiadis, Theodoros Dardavesis, Zoi Tsimtsiou","doi":"10.1177/15248399241275632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>LGBTQI+ individuals often face health disparities, with encumbered outcomes. We investigated the perspectives of a wide range of Greek health professionals using a battery of questionnaires examining LGBTQI+ health-related knowledge, attitudes, and clinical preparedness, while exploring the potential challenges they face when providing care for LGBTQI+ patients via qualitative analysis of their free text answers. In total, 220 health professionals participated, including physicians, nurses, dentists, physiotherapists, social workers, nutritionists, medical laboratory professionals, pharmacists, radiographers, and health promotion specialists. Four main themes were revealed concerning the barriers to providing equitable and patient-centered care to LGBTQI+ individuals: (1) Inadequate knowledge (1a. Distinctive health issues of the LGBTQI+ community, 1b. Community-related terminology), (2) Insufficient communication skills (2a. General approach of LGBTQI+ patients, 2b. Addressing LGBTQI+ individuals, 2c. Managing critical attitudes of colleagues/third parties), (3) Personal perceptions (3a. Attitudes toward the LGBTQI+ community, 3b. Perceptions on the necessity of sexual health history), and (4) Ambiguous bureaucratic procedures. Self-identification, contact with community members in personal life, as well as LGBTQI+ patients' openness during the encounter were reportedly enabling inclusive care. Most participants (83.2%) expressed willingness for further training on LGBTQI+ health issues. Going forward, study participants identified this field, in conjunction with communication skills, as important areas of focus for training health providers and empowering them to provide equitable, patient-centered, high-quality care to the LGBTQI+ community.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241275632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative Insights Into Healthcare Professionals' Perceived Barriers in Providing Equitable and Patient-Centered Care to Members of the LGBTQI+ Community in Greece.\",\"authors\":\"Ilias Pagkozidis, Anna Bettina Haidich, Loukas Athanasiadis, Theodoros Dardavesis, Zoi Tsimtsiou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399241275632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>LGBTQI+ individuals often face health disparities, with encumbered outcomes. We investigated the perspectives of a wide range of Greek health professionals using a battery of questionnaires examining LGBTQI+ health-related knowledge, attitudes, and clinical preparedness, while exploring the potential challenges they face when providing care for LGBTQI+ patients via qualitative analysis of their free text answers. In total, 220 health professionals participated, including physicians, nurses, dentists, physiotherapists, social workers, nutritionists, medical laboratory professionals, pharmacists, radiographers, and health promotion specialists. Four main themes were revealed concerning the barriers to providing equitable and patient-centered care to LGBTQI+ individuals: (1) Inadequate knowledge (1a. Distinctive health issues of the LGBTQI+ community, 1b. Community-related terminology), (2) Insufficient communication skills (2a. General approach of LGBTQI+ patients, 2b. Addressing LGBTQI+ individuals, 2c. Managing critical attitudes of colleagues/third parties), (3) Personal perceptions (3a. Attitudes toward the LGBTQI+ community, 3b. Perceptions on the necessity of sexual health history), and (4) Ambiguous bureaucratic procedures. Self-identification, contact with community members in personal life, as well as LGBTQI+ patients' openness during the encounter were reportedly enabling inclusive care. Most participants (83.2%) expressed willingness for further training on LGBTQI+ health issues. Going forward, study participants identified this field, in conjunction with communication skills, as important areas of focus for training health providers and empowering them to provide equitable, patient-centered, high-quality care to the LGBTQI+ community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399241275632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241275632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241275632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

LGBTQI+ 通常面临着健康差异,其结果也会受到影响。我们使用一系列问卷调查了希腊众多医疗专业人员的观点,调查内容包括 LGBTQI+ 健康相关知识、态度和临床准备情况,同时通过对自由文本答案的定性分析,探讨了他们在为 LGBTQI+ 患者提供医疗服务时可能面临的挑战。共有 220 名医疗专业人员参与了调查,其中包括医生、护士、牙医、物理治疗师、社会工作者、营养师、医学实验室专业人员、药剂师、放射技师和健康促进专家。研究揭示了为 LGBTQI+ 个人提供公平的、以患者为中心的医疗服务所面临的四大障碍:(1)知识不足(1a.LGBTQI+ 群体特有的健康问题,1b.社区相关术语),(2)沟通技巧不足(2a.对待 LGBTQI+ 患者的一般方法,2b.处理 LGBTQI+ 个人,2c.处理同事/第三方的批评态度),(3)个人看法(3a.对 LGBTQI+ 群体的态度,3b.对性健康史必要性的看法),以及 (4) 含糊不清的官僚程序。据报道,自我认同、在个人生活中与社区成员的接触以及 LGBTQI+ 患者在就诊过程中的坦诚态度都有助于提供包容性的医疗服务。大多数参与者(83.2%)表示愿意接受有关 LGBTQI+ 健康问题的进一步培训。展望未来,研究参与者认为这一领域以及沟通技巧是培训医疗服务提供者的重要重点领域,并使他们有能力为 LGBTQI+ 群体提供公平的、以患者为中心的高质量医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qualitative Insights Into Healthcare Professionals' Perceived Barriers in Providing Equitable and Patient-Centered Care to Members of the LGBTQI+ Community in Greece.

LGBTQI+ individuals often face health disparities, with encumbered outcomes. We investigated the perspectives of a wide range of Greek health professionals using a battery of questionnaires examining LGBTQI+ health-related knowledge, attitudes, and clinical preparedness, while exploring the potential challenges they face when providing care for LGBTQI+ patients via qualitative analysis of their free text answers. In total, 220 health professionals participated, including physicians, nurses, dentists, physiotherapists, social workers, nutritionists, medical laboratory professionals, pharmacists, radiographers, and health promotion specialists. Four main themes were revealed concerning the barriers to providing equitable and patient-centered care to LGBTQI+ individuals: (1) Inadequate knowledge (1a. Distinctive health issues of the LGBTQI+ community, 1b. Community-related terminology), (2) Insufficient communication skills (2a. General approach of LGBTQI+ patients, 2b. Addressing LGBTQI+ individuals, 2c. Managing critical attitudes of colleagues/third parties), (3) Personal perceptions (3a. Attitudes toward the LGBTQI+ community, 3b. Perceptions on the necessity of sexual health history), and (4) Ambiguous bureaucratic procedures. Self-identification, contact with community members in personal life, as well as LGBTQI+ patients' openness during the encounter were reportedly enabling inclusive care. Most participants (83.2%) expressed willingness for further training on LGBTQI+ health issues. Going forward, study participants identified this field, in conjunction with communication skills, as important areas of focus for training health providers and empowering them to provide equitable, patient-centered, high-quality care to the LGBTQI+ community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
期刊最新文献
From Daunting to Doable: Tools for Qualitative Evaluation of a Complex Public Health Intervention. Strengthening Academic Public Health Programs and Workforce Development Through Fieldwork: Insights From a Novel Partnership Between New Mexico's Two Major Universities. Youth and Young Adult Access to Flavored Vaping Products Following a Sales Restriction in New York State: A Mixed Methods Approach. "It Has to Be Culturally Inclusive": Food Distribution Services for Diverse Communities in New York City. A Community-Engaged Research Study to Inform Tailored Programming for Smoking Cessation and Lung Cancer Screening Among At-Risk LGBTQ+ Elders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1