通过百分位数相对性衡量收入不平等。

Q1 Mathematics Quality & Quantity Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1007/s11135-024-01881-2
Vytaras Brazauskas, Francesca Greselin, Ričardas Zitikis
{"title":"通过百分位数相对性衡量收入不平等。","authors":"Vytaras Brazauskas, Francesca Greselin, Ričardas Zitikis","doi":"10.1007/s11135-024-01881-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The adage \"the rich are getting richer\" refers to increasingly skewed and heavily-tailed income distributions. For such distributions, the mean is not the best measure of the center, but the classical indices of income inequality, including the celebrated Gini index, are mean based. In view of this, it has been proposed in the literature to incorporate the median into the definition of the Gini index. In the present paper we make a further step in this direction and, to acknowledge the possibility of differing viewpoints, investigate three median-based indices of inequality. These indices overcome past limitations, such as: (1) they do not rely on the mean as the center of, or a reference point for, income distributions, which are skewed, and are getting even more heavily skewed; (2) they are suitable for populations of any degree of tail heaviness, and income distributions are becoming increasingly such; and (3) they are unchanged by, and even discourage, transfers among the rich persons, but they encourage transfers from the rich to the poor, as well as among the poor to alleviate their hardship. We study these indices analytically and numerically using various income distribution models. Real-world applications are showcased using capital incomes from 2001 and 2018 surveys from fifteen European countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49649,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Quantity","volume":"58 5","pages":"4859-4896"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring income inequality via percentile relativities.\",\"authors\":\"Vytaras Brazauskas, Francesca Greselin, Ričardas Zitikis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11135-024-01881-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The adage \\\"the rich are getting richer\\\" refers to increasingly skewed and heavily-tailed income distributions. For such distributions, the mean is not the best measure of the center, but the classical indices of income inequality, including the celebrated Gini index, are mean based. In view of this, it has been proposed in the literature to incorporate the median into the definition of the Gini index. In the present paper we make a further step in this direction and, to acknowledge the possibility of differing viewpoints, investigate three median-based indices of inequality. These indices overcome past limitations, such as: (1) they do not rely on the mean as the center of, or a reference point for, income distributions, which are skewed, and are getting even more heavily skewed; (2) they are suitable for populations of any degree of tail heaviness, and income distributions are becoming increasingly such; and (3) they are unchanged by, and even discourage, transfers among the rich persons, but they encourage transfers from the rich to the poor, as well as among the poor to alleviate their hardship. We study these indices analytically and numerically using various income distribution models. Real-world applications are showcased using capital incomes from 2001 and 2018 surveys from fifteen European countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality & Quantity\",\"volume\":\"58 5\",\"pages\":\"4859-4896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415483/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality & Quantity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01881-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Quantity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01881-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俗话说 "富者愈富",指的是收入分布越来越倾斜,尾数越来越多。对于这种分布来说,平均值并不是衡量中心的最佳指标,但经典的收入不平等指数,包括著名的基尼指数,都是以平均值为基础的。有鉴于此,有文献建议将中位数纳入基尼指数的定义中。在本文中,我们朝着这个方向又迈进了一步,为了承认不同观点的可能性,我们研究了三种基于中位数的不平等指数。这些指数克服了以往的局限性,例如(1)它们不依赖于平均值作为收入分布的中心或参考点,而收入分布是偏斜的,而且越来越严重地偏斜;(2)它们适用于任何尾部严重程度的人口,而收入分布正变得越来越严重;(3)它们不受富人之间转移的影响,甚至不鼓励富人之间的转移,但它们鼓励富人向穷人转移,以及穷人之间的转移,以缓解他们的困难。我们利用各种收入分配模型对这些指数进行了分析和数值研究。我们使用 15 个欧洲国家 2001 年和 2018 年调查的资本收入展示了现实世界中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring income inequality via percentile relativities.

The adage "the rich are getting richer" refers to increasingly skewed and heavily-tailed income distributions. For such distributions, the mean is not the best measure of the center, but the classical indices of income inequality, including the celebrated Gini index, are mean based. In view of this, it has been proposed in the literature to incorporate the median into the definition of the Gini index. In the present paper we make a further step in this direction and, to acknowledge the possibility of differing viewpoints, investigate three median-based indices of inequality. These indices overcome past limitations, such as: (1) they do not rely on the mean as the center of, or a reference point for, income distributions, which are skewed, and are getting even more heavily skewed; (2) they are suitable for populations of any degree of tail heaviness, and income distributions are becoming increasingly such; and (3) they are unchanged by, and even discourage, transfers among the rich persons, but they encourage transfers from the rich to the poor, as well as among the poor to alleviate their hardship. We study these indices analytically and numerically using various income distribution models. Real-world applications are showcased using capital incomes from 2001 and 2018 surveys from fifteen European countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Quantity
Quality & Quantity 管理科学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
276
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality and Quantity constitutes a point of reference for European and non-European scholars to discuss instruments of methodology for more rigorous scientific results in the social sciences. In the era of biggish data, the journal also provides a publication venue for data scientists who are interested in proposing a new indicator to measure the latent aspects of social, cultural, and political events. Rather than leaning towards one specific methodological school, the journal publishes papers on a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative data. Furthermore, the journal’s key aim is to tackle some methodological pluralism across research cultures. In this context, the journal is open to papers addressing some general logic of empirical research and analysis of the validity and verification of social laws. Thus The journal accepts papers on science metrics and publication ethics and, their related issues affecting methodological practices among researchers. Quality and Quantity is an interdisciplinary journal which systematically correlates disciplines such as data and information sciences with the other humanities and social sciences. The journal extends discussion of interesting contributions in methodology to scholars worldwide, to promote the scientific development of social research.
期刊最新文献
Biodegradable electronics: a two-decade bibliometric analysis Developing the halal-sufficiency scale: a preliminary insight Measuring income inequality via percentile relativities. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / sixth edition Using biograms to promote life course research. An example of theoretical case configuration relating to paths of social exclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1