比较在 COVID-19 大流行期间对门诊儿科样本进行的居家远程保健和面对面神经心理测量。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2024.2403734
Madeline C Manning, Pieter J Vuijk, Eline Laurent, Emmaline Cook, Ellen B Braaten, Alysa E Doyle, Mary K Colvin
{"title":"比较在 COVID-19 大流行期间对门诊儿科样本进行的居家远程保健和面对面神经心理测量。","authors":"Madeline C Manning, Pieter J Vuijk, Eline Laurent, Emmaline Cook, Ellen B Braaten, Alysa E Doyle, Mary K Colvin","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2403734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Research establishing the validity of neuropsychological assessment using telehealth (teleNP) is much needed in pediatric populations. <b>Method:</b> Current analyses compared performances on twelve common neuropsychological measures completed at home <i>via</i> teleNP or in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic in 476 youth (ages 6 to 17, M<sub>age</sub> 11.4 ± 3.0). <b>Results:</b> No differences were found on nine measures. In-person performances on three verbal tests were ∼1 scaled score point lower (all p<sub>adjusted</sub> <.05). Post-hoc analyses showed that the in-person pandemic performances were comparable to an in-person pre-pandemic cohort (unmasked). <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, teleNP was comparable to in-person assessment. Results indicate that teleNP administration does not result in substantially different performance in pediatric patients undergoing clinical evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing in-home telehealth and in-person administration of neuropsychological measures in an outpatient pediatric sample during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline C Manning, Pieter J Vuijk, Eline Laurent, Emmaline Cook, Ellen B Braaten, Alysa E Doyle, Mary K Colvin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2024.2403734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Research establishing the validity of neuropsychological assessment using telehealth (teleNP) is much needed in pediatric populations. <b>Method:</b> Current analyses compared performances on twelve common neuropsychological measures completed at home <i>via</i> teleNP or in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic in 476 youth (ages 6 to 17, M<sub>age</sub> 11.4 ± 3.0). <b>Results:</b> No differences were found on nine measures. In-person performances on three verbal tests were ∼1 scaled score point lower (all p<sub>adjusted</sub> <.05). Post-hoc analyses showed that the in-person pandemic performances were comparable to an in-person pre-pandemic cohort (unmasked). <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, teleNP was comparable to in-person assessment. Results indicate that teleNP administration does not result in substantially different performance in pediatric patients undergoing clinical evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2403734\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2403734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿科人群亟需通过远程医疗(teleNP)进行神经心理评估的有效性研究。研究方法在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对 476 名青少年(6 至 17 岁,Mage 11.4 ± 3.0)在家中通过远程 NP 或面对面完成的 12 项常见神经心理评估进行了分析比较。结果显示九项测试结果无差异。在三项言语测试中,面对面测试的成绩比远程测试低 1 分(均为调整后的结论):总体而言,远程 NP 与面对面评估结果相当。结果表明,对接受临床评估的儿科患者进行远程 NP 不会导致其表现出现重大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing in-home telehealth and in-person administration of neuropsychological measures in an outpatient pediatric sample during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: Research establishing the validity of neuropsychological assessment using telehealth (teleNP) is much needed in pediatric populations. Method: Current analyses compared performances on twelve common neuropsychological measures completed at home via teleNP or in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic in 476 youth (ages 6 to 17, Mage 11.4 ± 3.0). Results: No differences were found on nine measures. In-person performances on three verbal tests were ∼1 scaled score point lower (all padjusted <.05). Post-hoc analyses showed that the in-person pandemic performances were comparable to an in-person pre-pandemic cohort (unmasked). Conclusions: Overall, teleNP was comparable to in-person assessment. Results indicate that teleNP administration does not result in substantially different performance in pediatric patients undergoing clinical evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
期刊最新文献
Symptom validity indices for the Beck Depression Inventory-II: development and cross-validation in research and clinical samples. Development of a Symptom Validity Index for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Interpreting the direct- and derived-Trail Making Test scores in Argentinian children: regression-based norms, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and practice effects. Enhanced detection of suboptimal effort in psychoeducational assessments for dyslexia. Neuropsychological normative standards for late career physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1