{"title":"我们对地方能源计划的有效性了解多少?研究系统回顾","authors":"Richard Cowell , Jan Webb","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Local energy planning is increasingly promoted as pivotal to decarbonising energy. However, widespread interest has not been matched by examination of whether plans achieve positive outcomes in practice. Nor is it clear whether the research surrounding local energy planning is useful in understanding and enhancing efficacy. To address these gaps, this paper systematically reviews research into local energy planning, using multiple search terms and content analysis of 182 items, applying analytical categories derived from planning theory. Results show a literature dominated by development of analytical tools, mobilising planning theories of ‘technocratic rationality’, but limited evidence of these tools being used in plan-making. By comparison, our review found relatively modest research interest in stakeholder engagement, negligible analysis of plan outcomes, and minimal critical analysis of implementation challenges. These findings can be treated as an indicator of research deficit, but also as <em>reflective of</em> local energy planning ‘realities’, in which plan-making is voluntaristic, implementation is patchy, and most effort is directed towards municipalities' own energy practices. Consequently, local energy planning and research have rarely driven the more challenging decarbonisation actions that might prompt critiques which could generate a broadening of theoretical and methodological perspectives. Future research agendas need to escape the confines of single loop learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103767"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do we know about the effectiveness of local energy plans? A systematic review of the research\",\"authors\":\"Richard Cowell , Jan Webb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Local energy planning is increasingly promoted as pivotal to decarbonising energy. However, widespread interest has not been matched by examination of whether plans achieve positive outcomes in practice. Nor is it clear whether the research surrounding local energy planning is useful in understanding and enhancing efficacy. To address these gaps, this paper systematically reviews research into local energy planning, using multiple search terms and content analysis of 182 items, applying analytical categories derived from planning theory. Results show a literature dominated by development of analytical tools, mobilising planning theories of ‘technocratic rationality’, but limited evidence of these tools being used in plan-making. By comparison, our review found relatively modest research interest in stakeholder engagement, negligible analysis of plan outcomes, and minimal critical analysis of implementation challenges. These findings can be treated as an indicator of research deficit, but also as <em>reflective of</em> local energy planning ‘realities’, in which plan-making is voluntaristic, implementation is patchy, and most effort is directed towards municipalities' own energy practices. Consequently, local energy planning and research have rarely driven the more challenging decarbonisation actions that might prompt critiques which could generate a broadening of theoretical and methodological perspectives. Future research agendas need to escape the confines of single loop learning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962400358X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962400358X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
What do we know about the effectiveness of local energy plans? A systematic review of the research
Local energy planning is increasingly promoted as pivotal to decarbonising energy. However, widespread interest has not been matched by examination of whether plans achieve positive outcomes in practice. Nor is it clear whether the research surrounding local energy planning is useful in understanding and enhancing efficacy. To address these gaps, this paper systematically reviews research into local energy planning, using multiple search terms and content analysis of 182 items, applying analytical categories derived from planning theory. Results show a literature dominated by development of analytical tools, mobilising planning theories of ‘technocratic rationality’, but limited evidence of these tools being used in plan-making. By comparison, our review found relatively modest research interest in stakeholder engagement, negligible analysis of plan outcomes, and minimal critical analysis of implementation challenges. These findings can be treated as an indicator of research deficit, but also as reflective of local energy planning ‘realities’, in which plan-making is voluntaristic, implementation is patchy, and most effort is directed towards municipalities' own energy practices. Consequently, local energy planning and research have rarely driven the more challenging decarbonisation actions that might prompt critiques which could generate a broadening of theoretical and methodological perspectives. Future research agendas need to escape the confines of single loop learning.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.